Abstract
The manner in which cultural factors affect fertility has become an important area of anthropological concern. In this article, it will be shown that while fraternal polyandry does not affect individual fertility it does have a significant depressing effect on aggregate fertility and functions, unperceived and unintended, as an important mechanism for reducing population growth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benedict, B. (1972). Social regulation of fertility. In Harrison, G. A., and Boyce, A. J. (eds.),The Structure of Human Populations, Clarendon Press, Oxford, London.
Davis, K., and Blake, J. (1956). Social structure and fertility: An analytic framework.Economic Development and Cultural Change 4: 211–235.
Goldstein, M. C. (1971). Stratification, polyandry, and family structure in Central Tibet.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 27(1): 64–74.
Goldstein, M. C. (1974). Tibetan speaking agro-pastoralists of Limi: A cultural ecological overview of high altitude adaptation in the Northwest Himalaya.Objets et Mondes 14 (4): 259–268.
Goldstein, M. C. (1975). Report on Limi Panchayat, Humla District, Karnali Zone.Contributions to Nepalese Studies 2(2): 89–101.
Murdock, G. (1949).Social Structure. Macmillan, New York.
Nag, M. (1962).Factors Affecting Human Fertility in Non-industrial Societies: A CrossCultural Study. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 66, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies.