Abstract
The characteristics of court involved (CI) (n=86) and non-court-involved (NCI) men (n=42) who abused their wives and attended a treatment program were investigated. The groups experienced similar childhoods concerning family violence. The NCI men had more years of education, were more likely to be employed full-time, and tended to earn more money than the CI men. The NCI men also had more social support and scored higher on interpersonal problems than the CI men. The CI men were more likely to be separated, more reported drinking during their most recent assaultive occasion. Compared to the norms on the Basic Personality Inventory, both groups scored significantly higher on depression, anxiety, feelings of alienation, hypochondriasis, and impulse expression. CI men had higher denial and social introversion scores and NCI men had higher interpersonal problem scores than the norm. These findings have some implications for the planning of treatment programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, M. (1977). Issues of violence in family casework.Social Casework,:58 3–12.
Benjamin, L., and Waly, E. (1983).Violence in the Family: Child and Spouse Abuse, ERIC/CAPS, Ann Arbor, MI.
Browning, J. (1984).Stopping the violence: Canadian programmes for assaultive men, National Clearinghouse on Family Violence, Health and Welfare, Canada.
Byles, J., Byrne, C., Boyle, M. H., and Offord, D. R. (1988). Ontario Child Health Study: Reliability and validity of the General Functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device.Fam. Proc. 21(1): 97–104.
Chen, H., Bersani, C., Myers, S. C., and Denton, R. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of a court sponsored abuser treatment program.J. Fam. Viol. 4(4): 309–322.
Eddy, M., and Myers, T. (1984).Helping men who batter Profile of programs in the United States. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.
Feazell, C. S., Mayers, R. S., and Deschner, J. (1984). Services for men who batter: Implications for programs and policies.Fam. Relat. 33: 217–233.
Flynn, J. (1975).Spouse Assault: Its Dimensions and Characteristics in Kalamazoo County, Mich. Kalamazoo, Mich. Field Studies in Reseach and Practice, Western Michigan University.
Ganley, A. (1981).Court-mandated counseling for men who batter A three-day workshop, Centre for Women Policy Studies, Washington, D.C.
Gelles, R. J. (1974). Abused wives: Why do they stay?J. Marr. Fam. 38: 659–668.
Gelles, R. J. (1980). Violence in the family: A review of the research in the seventies.J. Man. Fam. 42(4): 873–885.
Gelles, R. J. (1982). Applying research on family violence to clinical practice.J. Marr. Fam. 2: 9–20.
Giles-Sims, J. (1983).Wife Battering: A Systems Theory Approach, Guilford, New York.
Gondolf, E. E. (1985). Fighting for control. A clinical assessment of men who batter.Social Casework 61: 48–54.
Grunsznski, R. J., and Carrillo, T. P. (1988). Who completes batterer's treatment groups? An empirical investigation.J. Fam. Viol. 3(2): 141–150.
Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1988). Skills training for treatment of spouse abusers: An outcome study.J. Fam. Viol 3(2): 121–130.
Hill, T. D., and Jackson, D. N. (1984).Parallel Forms for The Basic Personality Inventory, Research Bulletin #616, Dept. of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
Jackson, D. N. (1989).Basic Personality Inventory, Sigma Assessment Systems, Inc., London, Ontario.
Kaufman, G. K., and Straus, M. A. (1987). The ‘drunken bum’ theory of wife battering.Social Probl. 3334(3): 213–230.
McLeod, L. (1987).Battered But Not Beaten: Preventing Wife Battering in Canada, Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women, Ottawa, Canada.
Owens, D. J., and Straus, M. A. (1975). The social structure of violence in childhood and approval of violence as an adult.Aggr. Behav. 1: 193–211.
Pirong-Good, M. A., and Stets-Kealy, K. E. (1985). Male batterers and battering prevention programs: A national survey.Resp. Vict. Wom. Child 8: 8–12.
Ponzetti, J., Cate, R., and Koval, J. (1982). Violence between couples: Profiling the male abuser.Person. Guid. J. 61: 222–224.
Prescott, S., and Letko, C. (1977). Battered women: A social psychological perspective. In Roy, M. (ed.),Battered Women: A Psychosocial Study of Domestic Violence, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.
Pressman, B. M. (1984).Family Violence: Origins and Treatment, Children's Aid Society of the City of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Roberts, R. (1987). Psychosocial characteristics of batterers: A study of 234 men charged with domestic violence offenses.J. Fam. Viol. 2(1): 81–94.
Rosenbaum, A. (1988). Methodological issues in marital violence research.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 91–104.
Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 63–71.
Roy, M. (1982).The Abusive Partner: An Analysis of Domestic Battering, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.
Schuerger, J. M., and Reigle, N. (1988). Personality and biographic data that characterize men who abuse their wives.J. Clin. Psychol. 44: 75–81.
Stacy, W., and Shupe, A. (1983).The Family Secret Domestic Violence in America, Beacon Press, Boston.
Steinmetz, S. K. (1977).The Cycle of Violence: Assertive, Aggressive and Abusive Family Interaction, Praeger Publishers, New York.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–86.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, New York.
Wetzel, L., and Ross, M. (1983). Psychological and social ramifications of battering: Observations leading to a counselling methodology for victims of domestic violence.Person. Guid. J. 61: 423–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barrera, M., Palmer, S., Brown, R. et al. Characteristics of court-involved men and non-court-involved men who abuse their wives. J Fam Viol 9, 333–345 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531943
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531943