A central focus of neighborhood studies has been on the cohesion of neighborhood social groups. When it has been studied as an independent variable, concern has been with the effect of varying levels of neighborhood cohesion on the behaviors of residents within the area. In studies of cohesion as a dependent variable, emphasis has been on changes occurring in the larger community and society which may affect the formation of cohesive neighborhoods. In most cases, however, the concept of cohesion has beeen inadequately conceptualized and measured. This paper discusses two considerations that are important in measuring neighborhood cohesion but are often neglected. These considerations refer to the number of separate dimensions of the cohesion concept and the system level at which the concept is measured. Four different dimensions of cohesion are discussed: use of local facilities, personal identification, social interaction, and value consensus. Differences between individual and structural measures of the concept are also discussed. A review of some of the ways in which neighborhood cohesion has been measured within the literature is provided, according to these two considerations. Some suggestions are made for constructing new measures, and an empirical example, concerned with land development, is presented to support the argument that cohesion must be measured on a number of different dimensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bell, W., and Boat, M. D. (1957). Urban neighborhoods and informal social relations.American Journal of Sociology 62: 391–398.
Bott, E. (1957).Family and Social Network, Tavistock, London.
Burkhardt, J. D. (1971). Impact of highways on urban neighborhoods: A model of social change.Highway Research Record 356: 85–94.
Caplow, T. S., and Forman, R. (1950). Neighborhood interaction in a homogeneous community.American Sociological Review 15: 357–366.
Caplow, T. S., Stryker, S., and Wallace, S. W. (1964).The Urban Ambience, Bedminister Press, Totawa, N.J.
Coleman, J. S. (1957).Community Conflict, Free Press, New York.
Dennis, N. (1958). The popularity of the neighborhood community idea.Sociological Review 6: 191–206.
Deutschberger, P. V. (1946). Interaction patterns in changing neighborhoods.Sociometry 9: 303–315.
Deveraux, E. C., Jr. (1960). Neighborhood and community participation.Journal of Social Issues 16: 64–84.
Feldt, A. (1965). The metropolitan area concept: An evaluation of the 1950 SMA's.Journal of the American Statistical Association 60: 617–636.
Fessler, D. R. (1962). The development of a scale for measuring community solidarity.Rural Sociology 17: 144–152.
Festinger, L., and Kelly, H. H. (1961).Changing Attitudes Through Social Contact, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Festinger, L., Schacter, S., and Back, K. (1950).Social Pressures in Informal Groups, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
Foley, D. L. (1952). Neighbors or urbanites. Mimeographed paper, Department of Sociology, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y.
Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In Duhl, L. J. (1ed.),The Urban Condition, Basic Books, New York.
Fried, M., and Gleicher. P. (1961). Some sources of residential satisfaction in an urban slum.Journal of the American Institute of Planners 27: 305–315.
Gans, H. J. (1962).The Urban Villagers, Free Press, New York.
Gans, H. J. (1967).The Levittowners, Pantheon, New York.
Harp, J., and Gagan, R. (1971). Scaling voluntary community organizations as an element of community structure.Social Forces 49: 72–83.
Highway Research Board (1973).Citizen Participation in Transportation Planning, Special Report 142, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in Utopian communities.American Sociological Review 33: 499–517.
Keller, S. (1968).The Urban Neighborhood, Random House, New York.
Kuper, L. (1953). Blueprint for living together. In Kuper, L. (ed.),Living in Towns, Cresset Press, London.
Landecker, W. S. (1951). Types of integration and their measurement.American Journal of Sociology 56: 332–340.
Litwak, E. (1960). Reference group theory, bureaucratic career and neighborhood primary group cohesion.Sociometry 23: 72–84.
Maccoby, E. E., Johnson, J. P., and Church, R. M. (1958). Community integration and the social control of juvenile delinquency.Journal of Social Issues 14: 38–51.
Mann, P. H. (1954). The concept of neighborliness.American Journal of Sociology 60: 163–168.
Matlins, M. (1972). Public policy and housing for urban blacks: Neighborhood reaction to public housing in a non-ghetto area. Unpubished master's thesis, Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In Mitchell, J. C. (ed.),Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester University Press, Manchester, England.
Reimer, S. (1951). Villagers in metropolis.British Journal of Sociology 2: 31–43.
Reiss, A. J. (1954). Some logical and methodological problems in community research.Social Forces 33: 51–67.
Reiss, A. J. (1959). The sociological study of communities.Rural Sociology 24: 118–130.
Ross, H. L. (1962). The local community: A survey approach.American Sociological Review 27: 75–84.
Ryan, W. (1971).Blaming the Victim, Pantheon, New York.
Schacter, S. (1968). Social cohesion. InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 2, Macmillan and Free Press, New York, pp. 542–546.
Smith, R. A. (1973). Community structure and innovation: A study of the effects of social structure on program adoption and implementation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Stone, G. (1954). City shoppers and urban identification.American Journal of Sociology 60: 36–45.
Suttles, G. (1968).The Social Order of the Slum, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Unseem, R., Unseem, J., and Gibson, D. (1960). The function of neighboring for the middle class male.Human Organization 19: 68–76.
Wallin, P. (1953). A Guttman scale for measuring women's neighborliness.American Journal of Sociology 59: 243–246.
Young, F. (1972). Macro-social accounting for developing countries. Mimeographed paper, Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Young, M., and Willmott, P. (1957).Family and Kinship in East London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, R.A. Measuring neighborhood cohesion: A review and some suggestions. Hum Ecol 3, 143–160 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531638
- neighborhood cohesion
- analytic units
- urban planning