Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensory reinforcement in the mentally handicapped and autistic child: A review

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sensory reinforcement was first studied by learning theorists working with animals in the 1950s. Attempts to examine the phenomenon with children followed in the 1960s, and the studies demonstrated that sensory stimuli could act like any other reinforcers with normal young children. Similar work with the autistic and mentally handicapped child arose in relation to both the study of receptor development and more treatment-oriented research. It now seems that even profoundly handicapped children can learn to operate simple levers when reinforced by sensory stimuli, and some handicapped children have learned quite complex skills through sensory reinforcement. There also appears to be a close relationship between stereotyped behavior and sensory reinforcement. The clinical implications of the studies reviewed are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference notes

  1. Friedlander, B. Z., & Knight, M. S.Systematic study of visual stimulus sensitivity in deaf-blind retarded children. Paper presented at the IVth International Conference on Deaf-Blind Children, Perkins School, Watertown, Massachusetts, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodall, E., & Corbett,J. Relationships between sensory stimulation and stereotyped behavior in severely retarded children. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, in press.

  3. Campbell, H. J. Personal communication, 1980.

  4. Hogg,J. Sensory and social reinforcement of head-turning in a profoundly retarded multiply handicapped child. Unpublished report, Hester Adrian Research Centre, Manchester University, 1975.

  5. Myrvang, G.Vibration as a stimulus and as a reinforcer with very profoundly retarded children. Unpublished report, 1973. (Obtainable from Niagara Therapy, Vauxhall Bridge Road, London.)

Reference

  1. Antonitis, J. J., & Barnes, G. W. Group operant behavior: An extention of individual research methodology to real-life situation.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1961,98, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baer, D. M. Escape and avoidance response of pre-school children to two schedules of reinforcement withdrawal.Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 1960,3, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baer, D. M. Effect of withdrawal of positive reinforcement on an extinguishing response in young children.Child Development, 1961,32, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, J., & Meyerson, L. Vibration as a reinforcer with a profoundly retarded child.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969,2, 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey, J., & Meyerson, L. Effect of vibratory stimulation on a retardate's self-injurious behaviour.Psychological Aspects of Disability, 1970,17 (3), 340.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bartak, L., & Rutter, M. Differences between mentally retarded and normally intelligent autistic children.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1976,6, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baumeister, A. A. Origins and control of stereotyped movements. In C. E. Meyers (Ed.),Quality of life in severely and profoundly mentally retarded people: Research foundations for improvement. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baumeister, A. A., & Forehand, R. Stereotyped acts. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berkson, G. Abnormal stereotyped motor acts. In J. Zubin & H. F. Hunt (Eds.),Comparative psychopathology: Animal and human. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berkson, G., & Davenport, R. K. Stereotyped movements of mental defectives. I. Initial survey.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1962,66, 849–852.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Butler, R. A. Discrimination learning by rhesus monkeys to visual-exploration motivation.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 1953,46, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Butler, R. A., & Harlow, H. F. Persistence of visual exploration in monkeys.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 1954,47, 258–263.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butler, R. A., & Harlow, H. F. Discrimination learning and learning sets to visual exploration incentives.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1957,57, 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Byrne, D. Vibrator becomes a motivator for the multiply handicapped.Teaching and Training, 1979,17, 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Byrne, D., & Stevens, C. Mentally handicapped children's responses to vibrotactile and other stimuli as evidence for the existence of a sensory hierarchy.Apex: Journal of the British Institute for Mental Handicap, 1980,8, 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, H. J. Peripheral self-stimulation as a reward in fish, reptile and mammal.Physiology and Behavior, 1971,8, 637–640.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke, A. M., & Clarke, A. D. B.Mental deficiency: The Changing outlook. London: Methuen, 1974. Ch. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke, A. M., & Clarke, A. D. B.Early experience: Myth and evidence. London: Open Books, 1976. Section II.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fineman, K. R. Shaping and increasing verbalization in an autistic child in response to visualcolor stimulation.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968,27, 1071–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frankel, F., Freeman, B. J., Ritvo, E., Chikami, B., & Carr, E. Effects of frequency of photic stimulation upon autistic and retarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1976,81, 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frankel, F., Freeman, B. J., Ritvo, E., & Pardo, R. The effect of environmental stimulation upon the stereotyped behavior of autistic children.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1978,8, 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Girdner, J. B. An experimental analysis of the behavioral effects of a perceptual consequence unrelated to organic drive states.American Psychologist, 1953,8, 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hemsley, R., & Carr, J. Ways of increasing behaviour-Reinforcement. In W. Yule & J. Carr, (Eds.),Behaviour modification for the mentally handicapped. London: Croon Helm, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hollis, J. Analysis of rocking behavior. In C. E. Meyers (Ed.),Quality of life in severely and profoundly mentally retarded people: Research foundations for improvement. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hubel, D. H., & Weisel, T. N. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye-closure in kittens.Journal of Physiology, 1970,206, 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hutt, C. Exploration and play in children. In P. A. Jewell & C. Loizos (Eds.),Play, exploration, and territory in mammals. London: Academic Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hutt, C. Temporal effects on response decrement and stimulus satiation in exploration.British Journal of Psychology, 1967,58, 65–373.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hutt, C., & Hutt, S. Effects of environmental complexity on stereotyped behaviour of children.Animal Behaviour, 1965,13, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, D., Firth, H., & Davey, G. C. L. Vibration and praise as reinforcers for mentally handicapped people.Mental Retardation, 1978,16, 339–342.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jones, C. The uses of mechanical vibration with the severely mentally handicapped. Part I: Clinical effects. Part II: Behavioral effects.Apex: Journal of the British Institute of Mental Handicap, 1980,7, 81–82; 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kaufman, M. E., & Levitt, H. A study of three stereotyped behaviors in institutionalized mental defectives.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1965,69, 467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kish, G. B. Learning when onset of illumination is used as a reinforcing stimulus.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 1955,48, 261–264.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kish, G. B. Sensory reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior: Areas of research of application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meyerson, L., Kerr, N., & Michael, J. Behavior modification in rehabilitation. In S. Bijou & D. Baer (Eds.),Child development: Readings in experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ohwaki, S., Brahlek, J. A., & Stayton, S. E. Preference for vibratory and visual stimulation in mentally retarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973,77, 733–736.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ohwaki, S., & Stayton, S. E. Preference by the retarded for vibratory and visual stimulation as a function of mental age and psychotic reaction.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1976,85, 516–522.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rehagen, N. J., & Thelen, M. H. Vibration as positive reinforcement for retarded children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1972,80, 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Remington, R. F., Foxen, T., & Hogg, J. Auditory reinforcement in profoundly retarded multiply-handicapped children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1977,82, 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rheingold, H. L., Stanley, W. C., & Doyle, G. A. Visual and auditory reinforcement of a manipulatory response in the young child.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1964,1, 316–326.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rice, H. K., & McDaniel, M. W. Operant behaviour in vegetative patients.Psychological Record, 1966,16, 279–281.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rice, H. K., McDaniel, M. W., Stallings, V. D., & Gatz, M. J. Operant behaviour in vegetative patients, II.Psychological Record, 1967,17, 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rincover, A. Sensory extinction: A procedure for eliminating self-stimulatory behavior in developmentally disabled children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1978,6, 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rincover, A., Cook, R., Peoples, A., & Packard, D. Sensory extinction and sensory reinforce-principles for programming multiple adaptive behavior change.Journal of Applied Analysis, 1979,12, 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rincover, A., Newson, C. D., Lovaas, O. I., & Koegel, R. L. Some motivational properties of sensory reinforcement with psychotic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,24, 312–323.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ryan, J., & Thomas, F.The politics of mental handicap. Hardmondsworth: Penguin, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schaeffer, H. H. Vibration as a reinforcer for infant children.Journal of Experimental Analytical Behaviour, 1960,3, 160.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schopler, E. Visual versus tactual receptor preferences in normal and schizophrenic children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966,71, 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Siqueland, E. R. Reinforcement patterns and extinction in human newborns.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1968,6, 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stevenson, H. W., & Knights, R. M. Effect of visual reinforcement on the performance of normal and retarded children.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1961,13, 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stevenson, H. W., & Odom, R. D. Effects of pre-training on the reinforcing value of visual stimuli.Child Development, 1961,32, 739–744.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Williams, C.An observational study of mannerisms in the deaf-blind child. Unpublished doc-doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, 1975.

  52. Williams, C. Strategies of intervention with the profoundly retarded visually-handicapped child: A brief report of a study of stereotypy. Division of Education and Child Psychology, British Psychological Society: Occasional Papers II, No. II, 1978, pp. 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychiatry, London

    Glynis Murphy

Authors
  1. Glynis Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This review was written while the author was supported by a Bethlem Royal Hospital research grant. The author is very grateful to Maria Callias, Dr. Janet Carr, Mrs. E. Goodall, and Dr. J. Corbett for their helpful comments on the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, G. Sensory reinforcement in the mentally handicapped and autistic child: A review. J Autism Dev Disord 12, 265–278 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531372

Keywords

Search

Navigation