Abstract
Examination of Thai ethnographic materials highlights several problems in comparative analysis of social processes that are population linked. Marked differences in family composition among four Central Thai villages are shown to arise primarily from a common family system operating on different underlying sociocultural and demographic processes. Satisfactory analysis requires detailed demographic data, information on other sociocultural processes, and a formal model of family dynamics relating the demographic to the other kinds of data. Lack of even one of these three components may make comparison meaningless. Demographic anthropology and historical demography provide complementary data well suited to anthropological studies of social organization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burch, T. K. (1970). Some demographic determinants of average household size: An analytical approach. In Laslett, P., and Wall, R. (eds.),Household and Family in Past Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–102.
Coale, A. (1965). Estimates of average size of household. In Coale, A.,et al. (eds.),Aspects of the Analysis of Family Structure, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 64–69.
Foster, B. L. (1975). Continuity and change in rural Thai family structure.Journal of Anthropological Research 31: 34–50.
Foster, B. L. (1977a). Adaptation to changing economic conditions in four Thai villages. In Wood, W. (ed.),Cultural Ecological Perspectives on Southeast Asia, Ohio University, Papers in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, Athens, Ohio, pp. 113–126.
Foster, B. L. (1977b).Social Organization of Four Mon and Thai Villages. HRAF Press, HRAFlex Books, New Haven.
Foster, B. L. (1978a). Socioeconomic consequences of stem family composition in a Thai village.Ethnology 17: 139–156.
Foster, B. L. (1978b). Domestic development cycles as a link between population processes and other social processes.Journal of Anthropological Research 34: 415–441.
Gilbert, J. P., and Hammel, E. A. (1966). Computer simulation analysis of problems in kinship and social structure.American Anthropologist 68: 71–93.
Hammel, E. A. (1970). The Zadruga as process. In Laslett, P., and Wall, R. (eds.),Household and Family in Past Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 335–373.
Hammel, E. A., and Wachter, K. W. (1977). Primonuptiality and ultimonuptiality: Their effects on stem-family-household frequencies. In Lee, R. D. (ed.),Population Patterns in the Past, Academic Press, New York, pp. 113–134.
Henry, L. (1968). Historical demography.Daedalus 97: 385–396.
Kunstadter, P. R., Buhler, F. S., and Westhoff, C. F. (1963). Demographic variability and preferential marriage patterns.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 21: 511–519.
Levy, M. J., Jr. (1965). Aspects of the analysis of family structure. In Coale, A. J.,et al. (eds.),Aspects of the Analysis of Family Structure, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 1–63.
McCluer, J. W., Neel, J. V., and Chagnon, N. A. (1971). Demographic structure of a primitive population: A simulation.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 353–362.
Revelle, R. (1968). Introduction to the issue “Historical Population Studies.”Daedalus 97: 353–362.
Thailand National Statistical Office (n.d.)Report. The survey of population change. 1964–1967. Bangkok.
Thomlinson, R. (1971).Thailand's population: Facts, trends, problems and policies. Bangkok.
Yengoyan, A. A. (1968). Demographic and ecological influences on Aboriginal Australian marriage sections. In Lee, R., and Devore, I. (eds.),Man the Hunter, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 185–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foster, B.L. Microdemographic variation and family composition in four thai villages. Hum Ecol 10, 439–454 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531166
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531166