Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 3, Issue 1–2, pp 10–25 | Cite as

FDA's ban of the use of DES in meat production a case study

  • Joseph V. Rodricks


Veterinary Medicine Meat Production Agricultural Economic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schoental, R. “Carcinogens in Plants and Microorganisms.” inChemical Carcinogens. C. E. Searle (ed). ACS Monograph 173. American Chemical Society. Washington, D.C. (1976). pp. 589–591.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jukes, T. H. “A Quantitative Evaluation of Estrogens, Including DES, in the Diet.”The American Statistician.36, 273 (1982).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. R. 44, 54852 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lawless, E. W.Technology and Social Shock. Rutgers University Press. New Brunswick, N.J. (1977), pp. 70–81.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu, F. C., and Rendel, J. (Eds.)Anabolic Agents in Animal Production. FAO/WHO Symposium. Geong Thieme Publishers. Stuttgart, (1976).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mintz, M.Washington Post. 12 November, (1971). p. A2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wade, N.Science, 177, 335 (July 28), 1972. With Correspondence, Science178, 117 (Oct 13, 1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fed. Reg. 37, 5264 and 12251 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fed. Reg. 37, 15747 (1972) and38, 10485 (1973).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    New York Times. Editorial. 30 April (1973).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce;Compilation of Selected Acts within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, 96th Congress, 1st session (1979). See also reference 3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. R. 41, 1864 (1976) and citations therein.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jukes, T. H.Tox Subs J. 2,112 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. R. 38, 11421 (1973). See alsoFed. Reg. 44, 17670 (1979).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    NRC.Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. (1983).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gass, G. H., Gaots, D. and Graham, N.J. National Cancer Inst., 33, 971 (1964).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jukes, T. H. Letter to J. M. Halloran, Consumers Union Foundation, Inc. 21 April (1983).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen, E. Written Testimony at FDA Hearings on DES, FDA Docket No. 76N-002 (1977).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Metzler, M. inMetabolic Activation of Carcinogenic DES in Rodents and Humans; Hormone Research II, M. Norvell and T. Schellenberger, ed. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C. 1976.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blackburn, G. M., Thomson, M. H., and King, H. W. S.Biochemical Journal, 158, 643 (1976).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bibbo, M., Gill, W. B., Azizi, F., Blough, R., Fang, V. S., Rosenfield, R. L., Schumacher, G. F. B., Sleeper, K., Sonek, M. G. and Wied, G. L. J.Obstet. Gynecol. 49, 1–9 (1977).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aschbacher, P. W.DES Metabolism in Food Producing Animals in Hormone Research II, M. Norell and T. Schellenberger, eds. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C. (1976).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jukes, T. H.T.I.B.S. 5, 309 (1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph V. Rodricks

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations