Skip to main content
Log in

Autosyndesis and structural hybridity in F1-hybrid Helianthus tuberosus L. x Helianthus annuus L. and their sequences

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Meiosis in F1-hybridHelianthus tuberosus (n=51) xH. annuus (n=17) was studied. At least five inversions were determined with certainty. The genom formula ofH. tuberosus should be At1At2Bt/At1At2Bt and that ofH. annuus-Ba/Ba. Genom formula of F1-hybrid is At1Bt/At2Ba, the chromosomes of Ba-genom conjugating with those of Bt-genom, while the other chromosomes of the other two genoms (At1 and At2) conjugating autosyndetically.

Cytogenetic indices for producing plants combining characters ofH. tuberosus andH. annuus are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Bauer, H., 1936. “Beiträge zur vergleichenden Morphologie der Speicheldrüsenchromosomen.” — Zool. Jahtb., 56: 239–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerell, D. A., 1929. “Hybrid sunflowers.” — Amer. Natur., 63: 470–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinin, N. P., Sokolov, N. N. andG. G. Tiniakov, 1936. “Occurrence and distribution of chromosome aberration in nature (Diptera).” —Nature, June, pp. 1035–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, Dontcho, 1930. “Ontogeny, genetics and cytology ofNicotiana hybrids.” — Genetica 12: 33–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, Dontcho, 1934. “A contribution to the meiosis ofHelianthus tuberosus L.” — Zeitschr. f. Pflanzenzücht., 19: 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, Dontcho, 1938. “Studies on polyploid plants XXI. Cytogenetic behaviour of the allopolyploid hybridsNicotiana glauca Grah. xNicotiana Langsdorffii Weinm. and their evolutionary significance.” Journ. Genet. 37: 129–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, Dontcho, 1938b. “Directed hereditable variations conditioned by euploid chromosome alterations in higher plants” — Nature (London) 142 (3608): 1117–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makowetzky, M., 1929. “Karyologische Untersuchung vonHelianthus, tuberosus, H. annuus undCychorium Intybus.” (Ukrainian with Germ. summary) — Journ. Agr. Bot., Harkiv, 2: 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müntzing, Arne, 1936. “The evolutionary significance of autopolyploidy.” — Hereditas (Lund), 21: 263–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozina, M. N., 1925. “Recherches caryologiques sur le turnesol. Division somatique chezHelianthus annuus.” — Jour. Russ. Bot. Soc., 9: 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shchibrya, N. A., 1936. “Interspecific hybridization between Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)” — Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Moscow, Vol. II, No. 5 (91).

  • Schhibrya, N. A., 1938. “Interspecific hybridization in the genusHelianthus L.” — Bull. Acad. Sci., Moscow, Ser. Biol., No. 3, pp. 732–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko, Z. D., 1937. “Meiosis in the F1-hybrids ofHelianthus divaricatus L. xHelianthus rigidus Desf.” — Cytogen. of cultiv. plants, pp. 61–71.

  • Tahara, M., 1915. “Cytological investigations on the root tips ofHelianthus annuus with special reference to the behaviour of the nucleolus.” —Bot. Magaz., Tokyo, 29: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S., 1932. “Artkreuzungen in der GattungHelianthus.” — Zeitsch. f. ind. Abst. Vererbungsl., 61:76–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kostoff, D. Autosyndesis and structural hybridity in F1-hybrid Helianthus tuberosus L. x Helianthus annuus L. and their sequences. Genetica 21, 285–300 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01508121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01508121

Keywords

Navigation