Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting sociology's first classic:The division of labor in society and its actuality

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Durkheim's doctoral dissertation can justifiably be called sociology's first classic. Rereading it 100 years later enables us to see major domains of the contemporary world where its analysis remains, of actuality, heuristic or yet to be fully appreciated: for example, its themes of anomieas economic deregulation and corporatism as an institutional arrangement to deal with anomie.At the same time, Durkheim's discourse reflects its historical embeddedness, such as his discussion of the sexual division of labor, which needs to be reworked. A second feature of emergent contemporary social solidarity unforeseen by Durkheim (and the great majority of theorists of change) is what may be termed “the return of mechanical solidarity.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1987 “The centrality of the classics.” In Anthony Giddens and Jonathan Turner (eds.), Social Theory Today: 11–57. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., ed. 1988 Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel 1977 “The return of the sacred? The argument on the future of religion.” British Journal of Sociology 28:419–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N. 1973 “Introduction” to Emile Durkheim, On Morality and Society: ix–lv. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., R. Madsen, W. M. Sullivan, A. Swidler, andS. M. Tipton 1991 The Good Society. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthelot, Jean-Michel 1988 “Introduction” to Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique, by Emile Durkheim: 7–68. Paris: Champs/Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, Raymond andFrançois Bourricaud 1989 (1982) A Critical Dictionary of Sociology, Peter Hamilton, trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, Charles 1989 “Structure after 50 years: The anatomy of a charter.” American Journal of Sociology 95:38–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, Janet Saltzman 1993 “Sociological theory: A case of multiple personality disorder.” Perspectives January: xx-xx.

  • Coleman, James S. 1993 “The rational reconstruction of society.” American Sociological Review 58:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis A. 1977 “Georg Simmel's neglected contributions to the sociology of women.” Signs 2:869–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile 1906–1909 “Critique of Marianne Weber's Ehefrau und Mutter in der Rechtsentwickelung.” Année Sociologique 11:363–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile 1984 The Division of Labor in Society. (1933, 1902, 1893), Trans. in English by George Simpson in 1933, and retranslated in 1984 by W. D. Hall. New York: Free Press, MacMillan. First French edition published in 1893 by Félix Alcan, Paris; rev. ed. with a new introduction by author in 1902, Alcan, Paris. Current French paperback edition published by PUF, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta 1990 The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai 1993 The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities & the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, Jerald and J. Rogers Hollingsworth 1993 “Rethinking the theory of the liberal state: Towards a conception of collective responsibility, permanent mobilization, and citizenship.” Paper presented at the Congress of the International Institute of Sociology, the Sorbonne, Paris, June 21–25.

  • Homans, George 1950 The Human group.

  • Jones, Robert Alun 1977 “On understanding a sociological classic.” American Journal of Sociology 83:279–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Robert Alun 1994 “The positive science of ethics in France: German influences onDe la Division du travail social.” Appears in French in Phillippe Besnard, M. Borlandi, and W. Paul Vogt (eds.),Division du Travail et Lien Social: La Thèse de Durkheim un Siècle Après. Paris: PUF, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter 1984 Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, Gerhard andPhilippe C. Schmitter (eds. 1982 Patterns of Corporatism Policy-Making. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven 1982 “Introduction” to The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method, by Emile Durkheim: 1–27. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, Marcel 1960 (1925) “Essai sur le Don.” In Mauss, Sociologie et Anthropologie: 145–279. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor, Elton 1933 The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization.

  • Merton, Robert K. 1934 “Durkheim's division of labor in society.” American Journal of Sociology 40:319–328. Reproduced in this issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1967 “On the history and systematics of sociological theory.” In Robert K. Merton, On Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Hans-Peter 1993 “Social differentiation and organic solidarity: The division of labor revisited.” Paper presented at the Durkheim Plenary Session, Eastern Sociological Society, Boston, March. In this issue.

  • Panitch, Leo 1979 “The development of corporalism in liberal democracies.” In Philippe C. Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends Toward Corporatism Intermediation. Beverly Hills & London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park and Burgess 1970 Introduction to the Science of Sociology (abridged student edition, Heritage of Sociology series). (1921, 1924) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott 1949 “Age and sex in the social structure of the United States.” In T. Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory Pure and Applied: 218–232. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott andEdward A. Shils 1951 “Values, motives and systems of action.” In T. Parsons and E. A. Shils (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action: 76–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perspectives 1993 Rejoinders to Janet Saltzman Chafetz, “Sociological theory: A case of multiple personality disorder.” March: xx-xx.

  • Rhea, Buford, ed. 1981 The Future of the Sociological Classics. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich 1993 “Variations on two themes in Durkheim's Division du Travail: Power, solidarity and meaning—Their role in division of labor.” Paper presented at the Durkheim Plenary Session, Eastern Sociological Society, Boston, March. In this issue.

  • Salisbury, Robert H. 1979 “Why no corporatism in America?” In Philippe Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends Toward a Corporatist Intermediation: 213–230. Beverly Hills & London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe andGerhard Lehmbruch (eds. 1979 Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg 1984 On Women, Sexuality and Love. Trans. Guy Oakes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Maron J. 1971 The Panama Affair. New York: Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofer, Catherine 1985 La Division du Travail entre Hommes et Femmes. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiryakian, Edward A. 1988 “Durkheim, Mathiez and the French Revolution: The political context of a sociological classic.” European Journal of Sociology 29:373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiryakian, Edward A. 1990 “Exegesis or synthesis? Comments on 50 Years of the Structure of Social Action.” American Journal of Sociology 96:452–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de 1969 Democracy in America. (1835) Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, Mark 1978 Emile Durkheim on Institutional Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Heritage of Sociology series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu Wei-Ming 1991 “The search for roots in industrial East Asia: The case of the Confucian revival.” In Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby (eds.), Fundamentalisms Observed, vol. I: 740–781. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vucht Tijssen, Lieteke 1991 “Women and objective culture: Georg Simmel and Marianne Weber.” Theory, Culture and Society 8:203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, W. Paul 1993 “L'influence deLa Division du Travail Social sur la Sociologie Américaine.” In Philippe Besnard, Massimo Borlandi, and W. Paul Vogt (eds.),Division du Travail et Lien Social:la thèse de Durkheim un siècle après. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vromen, Suzanne 1987 Georg Simmel and the cultural dilemma of women. History of European Ideas 8:563–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Bruno 1933 Panama. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, Bruce 1991 “A comparative study of corporatist development.” American Sociological Review 56:283–294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiryakian, E.A. Revisiting sociology's first classic:The division of labor in society and its actuality. Sociol Forum 9, 3–16 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507701

Key words

Navigation