Skip to main content
Log in

Some evolutionary aspects of a comparative cyto-genetic investigation between Aconitum and Solanum

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Afify, A., 1933a. Chromosome form and behaviour in diploid and triploidAconitum.J. Gen. 27: 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afify, A. 1933b. The cytology of the hybrid betweenLycopersicum esculentum andL. racemigerum in relation to its parents.Genetica 15: 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babcock, E. B. andM. Navashin, 1930. The genusCrepis.Bibl. Gen. 6: 1–90.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belling, J., 1927b. The attachment of chromosomes at the reduction division in flowering plants.J. Gen. 18: 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clausen, R. E., 1931a. Inheritance inNicotiana Tabacum XI. Fluted assemblage.Amer. Nat. 65: 316–331.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clausen, R. E., 1931b. Inheritance inNicotiana Tabacum XII. Transmission features of carmine coral variegation.Zeits. f. A. 17: 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, J. L. andM. C. Mann, 1923. Interspecific hybrids inCrepis II. Preliminary report on the results of hybridisingCrepis setosa Hall withC. capillaris (L.)Wallr. and withC. biennis L.Genetics 8: 212–232.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Darlington, C. D., 1929a. Ring formation inOenothera and other genera.J. Gen. 20: 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darlington, C. D., 1929b. Meiosis in polyploids II.J. Gen. 21: 17–56.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darlington, C. D., 1929c. Chromosome behaviour and structural hybridity in theTradescantiae.J. Gen. 21: 207–286.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Darlington, C. D., 1931a. Meiosis in diploid and tetraploidPrimula sinensis.J. Gen. 24: 65–96.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Darlington, C. D., 1931d. The cytological theory of inheritance inOenothera.J. Gen. 24: 405–474.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Darlington, C. D. 1932., Recent advances in cytology. Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Darlington, C. D., 1932a. The control of the chromosomes by the genotype and its bearing on some evolutionary problems.Am. Nat. 66: 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Darlington, C. D. andK. Mather, 1932. The origin and behaviour of chiasmata III. TriploidTulipa.Cytologia 4: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erlanson, E. W., 1931. Sterility in wild roses and in some species hybrids.Genetica 16: 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Häkansson, A., 1929a. Die Chromosomen in der KreuzungSalix viminalis×caprea vonHeribert Nilsson.Hereditas 13: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jörgensen, C. A., 1928. The experimental formation of heteroploid plants in the genusSolanum.J. Gen. 19: 133–211.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lammerts, W. E., 1929. Interspecific hybridisation inNicotiana IX. Further studies on the cytology of the backcross projenies of thePaniculata-rustica hybrid.Genetics 14: 286–304.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lammerts, W. E., 1931. Interspecific hybridisation inNicotiana XII. The amphidiploidrustica-paniculata hybrid, its origin and cyto-genetic behaviour.Genetics, 16: 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Langlet, O. F. I., 1927. Beitrage zur Zytologie derRanunculazeen.Sv. Bot. Tidsskr. 21: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lewitsky, G. A., 1931. Experimentally produced alterations of the morphology of chromosomes.Am. Nat. 65: 564–567.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lindstrom, E. W., 1925. Inheritance in Tomatoes.Genetics 10: 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lindstrom, E. W., 1926. Linked inheritance in Tomatoes.Iowa State College J. Sci. 1: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lindstrom, E. W. 1927. The inheritance of ovate and related shapes in Tomato fruits.J. Agric. Res. 34: 961–981.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lindstrom, E. W., 1932a. First-chromosome genes in the Tomato.Genetics 17: 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lindstrom, E. W., 1932b. A fertile tetraploid Tomato, cross-sterile with diploid species.J. Hered. 23: 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mac Arthur, J. W., 1926. Linkage studies with the Tomato.Genetics 11: 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mac Arthur, J. W., 1928. Linkage studies with the Tomato II. Three linkage groups.Genetics 13: 410–420.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mac Arthur, J. W., 1931. Linkage studies with the Tomato.Trans. Roy. Canad. Inst. 18: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  31. McClintock, B., 1930. A cytological demonstration of the location of an interchange between non-homologous chromosomes inZea mays.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 16: 791–796.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Müntzing, A., 1930a. Outline to a genetic monograph of the genusGaleopsis — with special reference to the nature and inheritance of partial sterility.Hereditas 13: 185–356.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Müntzing, A., 1930b. Über Chromosomenvermehrung inGaleopsis-kreuzungen und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung.Hereditas 14: 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Müntzing, A., 1932a. Disturbed segregation ratios inGaleopsis caused by intraspecific hybridisation.Hereditas 16: 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Müntzing, A., 1932b. Cyto-genetic investigations on syntheticGaleopsis Tetrahit.Hereditas, 16: 105–154.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Navashin, M., 1925b. Polyploid mutations inCrepis. Triploid and pentaploid mutants ofCrepis capillaris.Genetics 10: 583–592.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Navashin, M., 1926. Variabilität des Zelkerns beiCrepis-Arten in bezug auf die Artbildung.Zeits. f. Zell. mik. Anat. 4: 171–215.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Navashin, M., 1927b. Über die Veränderung von Zahl und Form der Chromosomen infolge der Hybridisation.Zeits. f. Zell. mik. Anat. 6: 195–233.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Navashin, M., 1929a. Studies on polyploidy I. Cytological investigation on triploidy inCrepis.Univ. Calif. Publ. Agric. Sci. 2: 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Newton, W. C. F. andC. D. Darlington, 1929. Meiosis in polyploids I.J. Gen. 21: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sansome, E. R., 1932. Segmental interchange inPisum sativum.Cytologia 3: 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sansome, E. R., 1933. Segmental interchange inPisum II.Cytologia 5: 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sansome, F. W., 1930. Graft hybrids and induction of polyploids inSolanum. Proc. 9th. Int. Hort. Cong. London. A: 92–99.

  44. Sansome, F. W., 1933. Chromatid segregation inSolanum lycopersicum.J. Gen. 27: 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sansome, F. W. andJ. Philp, 1932. Recent advances in plant genetics. Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schafer, B. andL. la Cour, 1934. A chromosome survey ofAconitum.Ann. Bot. 48: 693–714.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sengbusch undHazenbusch, 1932. Immunitätszuchtung bei Tomaten.Zuchter 11: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stone, L. H. A. andK. Mather, 1932. The origin and behaviour of chiasmata IV. Diploid and triploidHyacinthus.Cytologia 4: 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Täckholm, G. 1922. Zytologische Studien uber die GattungRosa.Acta. Horti. Bergiani 7: 97–381.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Winkler, H. 1916. Über die experimentelle Erzeugung von Pflanzen mit abweichenden Chromosomenzahlen.Zeit. f. Bot. 8: 417–544.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Afify, A. Some evolutionary aspects of a comparative cyto-genetic investigation between Aconitum and Solanum. Genetica 18, 255–276 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507436

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507436

Keywords

Navigation