Skip to main content
Log in

Technological change and materials consumption in U.S. iron and steel manufacturing: An assessment of some environmental impacts

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shifting public conceptualizations of the environment have led to a comprehensive, ecological view of the impact of industrial activity. Nevertheless, primary attention has been focused on the problem of externalities, i.e., pollution. In an industry such as iron and steel manufacturing, with its heavy demands on mineral resources and various forms of energy, some equally important questions are raised about the extent to which technological change has resulted in environmentally beneficial or harmful tradeoffs or substitutions. It is found that there have taken place, over a 50-year period, substantial reductions in the amounts of iron ore and metallurgical coke required to produce a ton of iron; however, these developments have raised certain new environmental problems. In the energy sector, the industry has responded rationally to changing relative prices in making substitutions among sources. Demand for scrap, the major recycled input, is found to be very priceinelastic; furthermore, despite some radical changes in the contributions of various steelmaking technologies to total production, the overall ratio of scrap input to raw steel output has remained remarkably stable over the past quarter century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Iron and Steel Institute.Annual Statistical Report, Washington, D.C.

  • American Iron and Steel Institute (1971).The Steel Industry Today, Report to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Policy.

  • Ayres, R. U., and Kneese, A. V. (1969). Production, consumption, and externalities.Am. Econ. Rev. 59: 282–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure.Quart. J. Econ. 72: 351–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, M. G. (1972). The economics of changes in the scale of production in the U.S. iron and steel industry from 1900 to 1970. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. H. (1907).The Manufacture and Properties of Iron and Steel, Penton, Cleveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost.J. Law Econ. 3: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality (1971).Environmental Quality, Second Annual Report of the Council, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality (1972).Environmental Quality, Third Annual Report of the Council, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, J. H. (1968).Pollution, Property, and Prices, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • deBell, G. (ed.) (1970).The Environmental Handbook, Ballantine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1964).The Technological Society, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainsod, M. L., Gordon, L., and Palamountain, J. C. (1959).Government and the American Economy, 3rd ed., Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, B., Peirce, W. S., and Rosegger, G. (1970). Diffusion of major technological innovations in U.S. iron and steel manufacturing.J. Indust. Econ. 18: 218–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, B., Peirce, W. S., and Rosegger, G. (1972).Economics of Technological Change: With Special Reference to Iron and Steel Manufacturing, unpublished manuscript, Research Program in Industrial Economics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. I. (ed.) (1972).Ecology and Economics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M. (ed.) (1971).Problems in Political Economy, an Urban Perspective, Heath, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E. (1918).The Principles, Operations and Products of the Blast Furnace, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, H. H., Fishman, L. L., and Fisher, J. L. (1963).Resources in America's Future, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. Z. (1967).The Cost of Economic Growth, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Industrial Pollution Control Council (1972).The Steel Industry and Environmental Quality, Sub-Council Report, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (February 12, 1972). Pennsylvania sues U.S. Steel on air pollution.

  • Peltzman, S., and Tideman, T. N. (1972). Local versus national pollution control: Note.Am. Econ. Rev. 62: 959–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resources for the Future, Inc. (1972). The recycling shell game.Resources 39: 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. L. (1971). The 1971 report of the President's Council of Economic Advisers: Micro-economic aspects of public policy.Am. Econ. Rev. 61: 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Council of Economic Advisers (1971).Economic Report of the President, 1971, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Business and Defense Services Administration (1966).Iron and Steel Scrap Consumption Problems, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (1967).The Cost of Clean Water, Vol. III, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From a 1938 declaration of the U.S. Department of the Interior; cited in Fainsodet al. (1959, p. 705).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosegger, G. Technological change and materials consumption in U.S. iron and steel manufacturing: An assessment of some environmental impacts. Hum Ecol 2, 13–30 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507343

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507343

Keywords

Navigation