Abstract
Production rates of multijet hadronic final states observed ine + e − annihilation are compared with recent QCD calculations using renormalisation group improved perturbation theory toO(α 2 s ). The scale parameter\(\Lambda _{\overline {MS} } \) and the renormalisation scaleμ 2 are adjusted in order to reproduce the observed 2-,3-, and 4-jet event production rates. Small scales ofμ 2≈0.002·E 2cm provide a significantly better description of the overall 4-jet production rates and of 2-and 3-jet rates at small jet pair masses than calculations usingμ 2=E 2cm . The adjusted value of\(\Lambda _{\overline {MS} } \) depends on the choice ofμ 2. It decreases by a factor of two when going fromμ 2=E 2cm toμ 2=0.002·E 2cm and results in\(\Lambda _{\overline {MS} } = 95 MeV \pm 30 MeV\) MeV±30 MeV for 0.001≦μ 2/E 2cm ≦0.020. The predictions of an Abelian vector theory complete toO(α 2 s ) are not compatible with the observed dynamics of jet production. The experimental evidence for the energy dependence of α s , obtained from 3-jet event production rates observed in the center of mass energy range between 22 GeV and 56 GeV, does not depend on the detailed choice ofμ 2.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, 16th Intern. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Chicago-Batavia (1972); H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, H. Leutwyler: Phys. Lett. 47B (1973) 365; D. Gross, F. Wilczek; Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1343; H.D. Politzer: Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346
S. Bethke; Habilitationsschrift, University of Heidelberg 1987 (unpublished)
S. Bethke: Proc. XXIIIrd Rencontre de Moriond, Les Arcs (France), 1988; LBL Report LBL-25247 (1988)
JADE Coll. S. Bethke et al.: Phys. Lett. B 213 (1988) 235
TASSO-Coll. W. Braunchweig et al.: Phys. Lett. B 214 (1988) 286
AMY Coll. I. Park, et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 1713
Mark-II Coll. S. Bethke et al.: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 43 (1989) 325
JADE Coll. W. Bartel et al.: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 33 (1986) 23
G. Kramer, B. Lampe: J. Math. Phys. 28 (1987) 945; Z. Phys. C. 34 (1987) 497; Fortschr. Phys. 37 (1989) 181 G. Kramer: private communication
G. Kramer, B. Lampe: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 39 (1988) 101
S.J. Brodsky, G.P. Lepage, P.B. Mackenzie: Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 228
Ya. I. Azimov et al.: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 27 (1985) 65; Yu. L. Dokshitzer et al.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 373
G. Cohen-Tannoudji, W. Ochs: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 39 (1988) 513
N.K. Falck, G. Graudenz, G. Kramer: DESY-88-106 (1988); DESY-89-027 (1989)
T. Sjöstrand: Comp. Phys. Commun. 39 (1986) 347; T. Sjöstrand: Comp. Phys. Commun. 43 (1987) 367; M. Bengtsson, T. Sjöstrand: Nucl Phys. B289 (1987) 810
M. Glück, E. Reya: Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 3242
G. Kramer: Springer Tracts of Modern Physics, Vol. 102. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1984; DESY 83-068 (1983)
JADE Coll. W. Bartel et al.: Phys. Lett 119B (1982) 239
K. Fabricius et al.: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 11 (1982) 315
P.M. Stevenson: Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2916
S.L. Wu: Proc. Int. Symp. on Lepton and Photon Interactions, Hamburg 1987
F. Gutbrod et al.: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 35 (1987) 543
CELLO Collaboration: contributed paper to the Munich conference (1988)
N. Magnussen, PhD thesis Univ. of Wuppertal (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bethke, S. An experimental approach to optimise and test perturbative QCD toO(α 2 s ). Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 43, 331–340 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01506528
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01506528