Abstract
Two experiments investigated how mock jurors react to a case involving a repressed memory of child sexual assault. Subjects read a fictional civil trial (Experiment 1) or criminal trial (Experiment 2) summary involving the sexual assault of a 6-year-old female. The summary was presented in one of three conditions: (a)child condition: the alleged victim reported her memory of the assault in the same year that the assault occurred; (b)repressed condition: the alleged victim reported the assault 20 years later, after remembering it for the first time; or (c)no-repressed condition: the alleged victim reported the assault 20 years later, but the memory of the assault had been present for the 20 years. Although the testimony of the alleged victim was believed to some extent in all conditions, the alleged victim in the child condition was believed at the highest level, and this was associated with more decisions against the defendant. The results are discussed in terms of how delayed reporting of child sexual assault crimes is associated with lower believability of the alleged victim.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic?Psychological Bulletin, 93, 203–231.
Blume, E. S. (1990).Secret survivors: Uncovering incest and its aftereffects in women. New York: Ballantine Books.
Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.),Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 229–261). New York: Guilford.
Bottoms, B. L. & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702–732.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence.Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185–191.
Davis, P. J. (1987). Repression and the inaccessibility of affective memories.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 585–593.
Davis, P. J., & Schwartz, G. E. (1987). Repression and the inaccessibility of affective memories.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 155–162.
Devine, P. G., & Ostrom, T. M. (1985). Cognitive mediation in inconsistency discounting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 5–21.
Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1980). Constructing a science of jury behavior. In: L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 246–264). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Duggan, L. M., III, Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The believability of children as witnesses in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. In: S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 71–99). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Erdelyi, M. H. (1985).Psychoanalysis: Freud's cognitive psychology. New York: Freeman.
Erdelyi, M. H. & Kleinbard, J. (1978). Has Ebbinghaus decayed with time? The growth of recall (hypernesia) over days.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 275–289.
Erdelyi, M. H., & Goldberg, B. (1979). Let's not sweep repression under the rug: Toward a cognitive psychology of repression. In: J. F. Kihlstrom & F. J. Evans (Eds.).Functional disorders of memory (pp. 355–402). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Freud, S. (1894/1962). The neuro-psychoses of defense. In J. Strachey (Ed.).The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3). London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1896/1962). Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defense. In J. Strachey (Ed.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3). London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1915/1957). Repression. In J. Strachey (Ed.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14). London: Hogarth Press.
Ganaway, G. K. (1992). Some additional questions.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 20, 201–205.
Geiselman, R. E., Bjork, R. A., & Fishman, D. L. (1983). Disrupted retrieval in directed forgetting: A link with posthypnotic amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 58–72.
Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Herscovici, B. B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim's perceived believability. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., & Haith, M. M. (1984). Jurors' reactions to child witnesses.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139–156.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27–40.
Goodman, G. S., & Tobey, A. E. (1994). Memory development within the context of child sexual abuse allegations. In C. B. Fisher & R. M. Lerner (Eds.),Applied developmental psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Holmes, D. (1990). The evidence for repression: An examination of sixty-years of research. In J. Singer (Ed.),Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality, theory, psychopathology, and health (pp. 85–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Isquith, P. K., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1993). Blaming the child: Attribution of responsibility to victims of child sexual abuse. In G. S. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.),Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 203–228). New York: Guilford.
Leippe, M. R., Manion, A. P., & Romanczyk, A. (1992). Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and childrens' memory reports.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 181–197.
Loftus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories.American Psychologist, 48, 518–537.
Loftus, E. F., Weingardt, K. & Hoffman, H. (1993). Sleeping memories on trial: Reactions to memories that were previously repressed.Expert Evidence, 2, 51–59.
Myers, J. L., & Well, A. D. (1991).Research design and statistical analysis. New York: Harper Collins.
Nietzel, M. T., McCarthy, D., & Harris, M. J. (1994, August).Juries: The current state of the empirical literature. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
Nightingale, N. N. (1993). Juror reactions to child victim witnesses: Factors affecting trial outcome.Law and Human Behavior, 171, 679–694.
Rieker, P. P., & Carmen, E. H. (1986). The alleged victim-to-patient process: The disconfirmation and transformation of abuse.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 360–370.
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury.Law and Human Behavior, 14, 5–23.
Schutte, J. W. (1994). Repressed memory lawsuits: Potential verdict predictors.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 409–416.
Williams, M. (1987). Reconstruction of an early seduction and its aftereffect.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15, 145–163.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We would like to thank Christy Kennedy, Paula Brinegar, and Elizabeth Thomas for their assistance in collecting and scoring the data, as well as Michael Nietzel, Monica Kern, Ronald Roesch, and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Golding, J.M., Sego, S.A., Sanchez, R.P. et al. The believability of repressed memories. Law Hum Behav 19, 569–592 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499375
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499375