Skip to main content

Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defense

Abstract

Public opinion data show that the most prevalent concern expressed regarding the insanity defense is that it is a loophole through which would-be criminals escape punishment for illegal acts. This article examines the extent to which the public's perceptions of the insanity defense are consistent with newly collected empirical data. Specifically, it compares perceptions of the use, success, and outcomes associated with the insanity defense to data derived from a large-scale study of insanity pleas in eight states. The analysis reveals that the public overestimates the use and success of an insanity defense and underestimates the extent to which insanity acquittees are confined upon acquittal. The role of selective media reporting in the formation of public perceptions is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Appelbaum, P. (1982). The insanity defense: New calls for reform.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 13, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braff, J., Arvinites, T., & Steadman, H. J. (1983). Detention patterns of successful and unsuccessful insanity defendants.Criminology, 21 (3), 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, N. M., & Steadman, H. J. (1978). Legal professionals' perceptions of the insanity defense.The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, Summer, 6, 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, L. A., Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., & Robbins, P. C. (1991). The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: An eight state study.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 19(4), 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1981). Health and medicine on television.New England Journal of Medicine, 305, 901–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hans, V. P. (1986). An analysis of public attitudes toward the insanity defense.Criminology, 4(2), 393–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1991). Length of detention in matched groups of insanity acquittees and convicted offenders.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 223–236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. W., & Raifman, L. (1981). Hospitalization versus imprisonment and the insanity plea.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8(4), 483–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek, (1992), February 3). Insanity: A defense of last resort.Newsweek, p. 49.

  • Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy.American Political Science Review, 77, 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasewark, R. A., Pantle, M. L., & Steadman, H. J. (1982). Detention and rearrest rates of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity and convicted felons.American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 892–897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasewark, R. A., & Seidenzahl, D. (1979). Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 7(2), 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, M. L. (1993). Decoding right to refuse treatment law.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 16, 151–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. F., & Golding, S. L. (1991). The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity.Law and Human Behavior, 15(4), 349–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. F., Golding, S. L., & Finchman, F. D. (1987). Implicit theories of criminal responsibility.Law and Human Behavior, 11(3), 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., Morrissey, J., Callahan, L. A., Robbins, P. C., & Cirincione, C. (1993).Before and after Hinckley: Evaluating insanity defense reform. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. J. (1985). Empirical research on the insanity defense.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 477, 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza, J. C. (1978). Public perceptions of the criminally insane.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 29(7), 457–459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Time. (1992, February 3). Do mad acts a madman make?Time, p. 17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Silver, E., Cirincione, C. & Steadman, H.J. Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defense. Law Hum Behav 18, 63–70 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499144

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499144

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Empirical Data
  • Public Opinion
  • Selective Media
  • Public Perception