Skip to main content
Log in

The perils of presidential support: How the Republicans took the House in the 1994 midterm elections

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard (1995).Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, John R., and Brady, David W. (1993). Personal and partisan advantage in U.S. House elections, 1846–1992. In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer (eds.),Congress Reconsidered, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R. (1981). Increased incumbency advantage in the House.Journal of Politics 43: 1042–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. Douglas (1990).The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, Michael, and Ujifusa, Grant (1994).The Almanac of American Politics 1994. Washington, DC: National Journal, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Raymond A., de Sola Pool, Ithiel, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony (1972).American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade, 2nd ed. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris (1987).The Personal Vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, William, and Gore, Albert, Jr. (1992).Putting People First: How We Can All Change America. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, William F., Jr., and Pitney, John J., Jr. (1994). The future of the House Republicans.Political Science Quarterly 109: 571–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Philip D., and Lawrence, Christine C. (1995).Politics in America 1996: The 104th Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S. (1971). The electoral impact of congressional roll call voting.American Political Science Review 65: 1018–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S., and Wright, Gerald C. (1980). Policy representation of constituency interests.Political Behavior 1: 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard F., Jr. (1978).Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1974).Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, Brian J., and Rivers, Douglas (1995). Econometrics of the swing ratio. Paper presented at the Political Methodology Conference, Bloomington, Indiana.

  • Jacobson, Gary (1987). Running scared: Elections and congressional politics in the 1980s. In Mathew D. McCubbins and Terry Sullivan (eds.),Congress: Structure and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary (1990).The Electoral Origins of Divided Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary (1992).The Politics of Congressional Elections, 3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary (1995). The 1994 House elections in perspective. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meetings, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Kaplan, Dave (1994). This year, Republicans gamble that all politics is national.Congressional Quarterly Weekly, October 22, pp. 3005–3008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, Robin F., and Ostrom, Charles W., Jr., (1989). Explaining seat change in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1950–1986.American Journal of Political Science 33: 541–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, David R. (1974).Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress.American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outlooks by state (1994).Congressional Quarterly Weekly, October 22, pp. 3011–3061.

  • Rosenbaum, David E. (1994). G.O.P. unleashes its new weapon: Winning candidates.New York Times, November 13, p. D4.

  • Simon, Dennis M., Ostrom, Charles W., Jr., and Marra, Robin F. (1991). The president, referendum voting, and subnational elections in the United States.American Political Science Review 85: 1177–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Donald E. (1967). Parties and the nationalization of electoral forces. In William N. Chambers and Walter D. Burnham (eds.),The American Party System. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Donald E., and Miller, Warren E. (1962). Party government and the saliency of Congress.Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P. (1991).The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P. (1994).The Decline of American Political Parties. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Robert (1981). Have House elections become a meaningless ritual? In Norman Luttbeg (ed.),Public Opinion and Public Policy, 3d ed. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Gerald C., Jr. (1978). Candidates' policy positions and voting in U.S. House elections.Legislative Studies Quarterly 3: 445–464.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brady, D.W., Cogan, J.F., Gaines, B.J. et al. The perils of presidential support: How the Republicans took the House in the 1994 midterm elections. Polit Behav 18, 345–367 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499093

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499093

Keywords

Navigation