Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eyewitness identification by 5-to 6-year-old children

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Thirty-four 5-to 6-year-old children participated in a unique event in which children interacted with 4 individuals-2 for a long period of time and 2 for a brief period only. Each child was interviewed 1 to 2 days later with photographic lineups that contained the target individuals (target-present) or with lineups that did not (target-absent). When tested with target-present lineups, 5-to 6-year-old children were very accurate in identifying individuals with whom they had prolonged exposure, and were also accurate when asked to identify an individual who was present only briefly, but who was part of a salient aspect of the same event. In contrast, when tested with target-absent lineups, children's performance was very poor regardless of whether the to-be-identified individual had been seen briefly or for a prolonged period of time. These data have important implications for eyewitness identification by young children in clinical and legal settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker-Ward, L., Hess, T.M., & Flannagan, D.A. (1990). The effects of involvement on children's memory for events.Cognitive Development, 5, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C.R., Schmitt, K.L., & Dekle, D.J. (1995). Eyewitness identification of children. Effects of absolu judgments, nonverbal response options, and event encoding.Law and Human Behavior, 19, 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, R.L., & Winograd, E. (1978). Developmental differences in children's recognition memory for faces.Developmental Psychology, 14, 441–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S., Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (1995). The effect of drawing on memory performance in young children.Developmental Psychology,31 (4).

  • Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces.Science, 195, 312–314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition—A maturational component?Developmental Psychology, 16, 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, J.E. & Goldstein, A.G. (1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children's eyewitness testimony.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C.B. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). The memory of children. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 178–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G.M. (1993). Children's memory for other people: An integrative review. In C.A. Nelson (Ed.),Memory and affect in development. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 26 (pp. 123–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Stevenson-Robb, Y., & Flin, R. (1988). Tales out of school: Children's memory for an unexpected event. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues Vol. 1. (pp. 122–127). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Tarrant, A., & Flin, R. (1989). Close encounters of the witness kind: Children's memory for a simulated health inspection.British Journal of Psychology, 80, 415–429.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, H.R., & Stephenson, G.M. (1979). Identification evidence: Experimental investigation of factors affecting the reliability of juvenile and adult witness. In D.P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, & S.M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.),Psychology, law and legal processes (pp. 195–206). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R., & Hudson, J.A. (1990).Knowing and remembering in young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R., & Shukat, J.R. (1995). Content, consistency, and coherence in early autobiographical recall. In M.S. Zaragoza, J.R. Graham, G.C.N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y.S. Ben-Porath (Eds.),Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 5–23). California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R.H. (1980). Age effects in children's memory for unfamiliar faces.Developmental Psychology, 16, 373–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R.H. (1983, April).The ups and downs of face recognition. A unique developmental trend? Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Detroit, MI.

  • Goodman, G.S., Aman, C., & Hirschman, J. (1987). Child sexual and physical abuse: Children's testimony. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 1–23). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G.S., & Bottoms, B.L. (1993).Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G.S., Bottoms, B.L., Schwartz-Kenney, B.M., & Rudy, L. (1991a). Children's testimony for a stressful event: Improving children's reports.Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G.S., Hirschman, J., Hepps, D., & Rudy, L. (1991b). Children's memory for stressful events.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 109–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G.S., & Reed, R.S. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G.S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B.L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's concerns and memory: Is of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush & J.A. Hudson (Eds.),Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Grieve, R. (1983). On asking children bizarre questions. In M. Donaldson, R. Grieve, & C. Pratt (Eds.),Early childhood development and education (pp. 104–114). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.P.H., & Krugman, R.D. (1986). Can a three-year-old child bear witness to her sexual assault and attempted murder?Child Abuse & Neglect, 10, 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (1990).The development of memory in children. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M.A., & Yuille, J.C. (1987). Suggestibility and the child witness. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 24–35). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leippe, M.R., Romanczyk, A., & Manion, A.P. (1991). Eyewitness memory for a touching experience: Accuracy differences between child and adult witnesses.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 367–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R.C.L., & Wells, G.L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E.F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E.F. (1993). Psychologists in the eyewitness world.American Psychologist, 48, 550–552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, R.S. & Devine, P.G. (1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 482–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, B.V., Holmes, D.L., Guth, M., & Kovac, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses. A comparison of children and adults on eyewitness tasks.Law and Human Behavior, 3, 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J.F., & Carranza, L.E. (1989). Eyewitness testimony of children in target-present and target-absent lineups.Law and Human Behavior, 13, 133–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J.F., Haverfield, E., & Baker-Thomas, S. (1986). Eyewitness testimony of children.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J.F., & Ryan, V. (1993). An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children's and adults' eyewitness identifications.Law and Human Behavior, 17, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D.P. (1991). The influence of stress and arousal on the child witness. In J. Doris (Ed.),The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 60–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipe, M.-E. (1993). Children's testimony. In P.R.H. Webb, J.G. Adams, W.R. Atkin, L.L. Caldwell, & R.M. Henaghan (Eds.),Family law guide (6th ed., pp. 522–533). Wellington: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, D.C., & Yuille, J.C. (1989). Problems in evaluating interviews of children in sexual abuse cases. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 184–207). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, L., & Goodman, G.S. (1991). Effects of participation on children's reports: Implications for children's testimony.Developmental Psychology, 27, 527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, K., Bidrose, S., & Pipe, M.-E. (1995). Providing props to facilitate children's event reports: A comparison of toys and real items.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 174–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K.J. (1990). The child as witness: Experimental and clinical considerations. In A.M. La Greca (Ed.),Through the eyes of the child: Obtaining self-reports from children and adolescents (pp. 329–367). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, P.N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial recognition studies.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophian, C., & Stigler, J.W. (1981). Does recognition memory improve with age.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J.R., & Flin, R.H. (1993).The evidence of children: The law and the psychology. London: Blackstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, A.E. & Goodman, G.S. (1992). Children's eyewitness memory: Effects of participation and forensic context.Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 779–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G.L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification?American Psychologist, 48, 553–571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarmey, A.D. (1988). Streetproofing and bystanders' memory for a child abduction. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1 (pp. 112–116). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuille, J.C., & Wells, G.L. (1990). Concerns about the application of research findings: The issue of ecological validity. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 118–128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaragoza, M.S., Graham, J.R., Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Ben-Porath, Y.S. (1995).Memory and testimony in the child witness. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Julien Gross & Harlene Hayne

Authors
  1. Julien Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harlene Hayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harlene Hayne.

About this article

Cite this article

Gross, J., Hayne, H. Eyewitness identification by 5-to 6-year-old children. Law Hum Behav 20, 359–373 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499028

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499028

Keywords

Search

Navigation