Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

A basic but largely neglected issue in research on the reliability of children's testimony is the impact of certain questioning tactics (e.g., use of legalese and socioemotional intimidation) on the accuracy of children's reports. In the present study, 5- to 7-year-old children were interviewed about a standardized play event with free-recall cues and detailed questions that were specific or misleading. Linguistic complexity of questions (complex or simple) and socioemotional context of interview (supportive or intimidating) were varied between subjects. Results indicated that children were significantly less accurate in reporting the event when questioned with complex, developmentally inappropriate questions rather than simple questions, yet children rarely voiced their comprehension failures. In addition, children interviewed by a warm, supportive interviewer were more resistant to misleading questions about the event than were children interviewed in an intimidating manner. Theoretical interpretations and implications for investigative interviewing and policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, P. A. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., & Brennan, R. E. (1988).Strange language: Child victims under cross examination. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales: Riverina Literacy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., Albrecht, T. L., Goldsmith, D. J., & Sarason, I. G. (1994). Introduction: The communication of social support. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.),Communication of social support (pp. xi-xxx). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. P., & Duff, M. A. (1989). Young children's comprehension of modal expressions.Cognitive Development, 4, 369–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions.Columbia Law Review, 79, 1306–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choong, J., & McMahon, J. (1983). Comparison of scores obtained on the PPVT and the PPVT-R.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 40–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, H., & Flin, R. (1992).Children as witnesses. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Coleman, L. M. (1986). Talking to children, foreigners, and retarded adults.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 945–959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. (1990). Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination. In J. N. Levi & A. G. Walker (Eds.),Language in the judicial process (pp. 3–38). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Manual for Forms L and M. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J., Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1987). Facial expressions of emotion: Review of literature, 1970–1983. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Nonverbal behavior and communication (pp. 143–224).

  • Goodman, G. S., & Bottoms, B. L. (Eds.) (1993).Understanding and improving children's testimony. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's testimony for a stressful event: Improving children's reports.Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., Melton, G. B., & Ogden, D. W. (1991). Child witnesses and the confrontation clause: The American Psychological brief inMaryland v. Craig.Law and Human Behavior, 15, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B. L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's concerns and memory: Ecological issues in the study of children's eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush & J. Hudson (Eds.),Knowing and remembering in young children. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., & Schwartz-Kenney, B. M. (1992). Why knowing a child's age is not enough: Influences of cognitive, social, and emotional factors on children's testimony. In R. Flin & H. Dent (Eds.),Children as witnesses (pp. 15–32). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. K. Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Serial No. 229, Vol. 57(#5).

  • Green, G. M. (1990). Linguistic analysis of conversation as evidence regarding the interpretation of speech events. In J. N. Levi & A. G. Walker (Eds.),Language in the judicial process (pp. 247–277). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics, Vol. III:Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. F., Loftus, E. F., & Tousignant, J. P. (1984). Postevent information and changes in recollection for a natural event. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.),Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 124–141). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 363–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., & Weil, J. (1982). Acquisition of epistemic and deontic meanings of modals.Journal of Child Language, 9, 659–666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Grieve, R. (1980). On asking children bizarre questions.First Language, 1, 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. H. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.),Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idaho v. Wright, 116 Idaho 382, 775 P. 2d 1224 (1989).

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958).The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information.Communication Education, 37, 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1977). Spatial organization in social encounters: TheF-formation system. In A. Kendon (Ed.),Studies in the behavior of social interaction. Lisse, Holland: Peter deRidder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. A., & Yuille, J. C. (1987). Suggestibility and the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 24–35). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1969). The logic of non-standard English.Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977).Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. T. (1989). My life in court. In D. Tannen & J. E. Alatis (Eds.),Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 171–179). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, J. N. (1990). The study of language in the judicial process. In J. N. Levi & A. G. Walker (Eds.),Language in the judicial process (pp. 3–38). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1987).Pragmatics. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, N. J., & Duchan, J. F. (1988).Assessing children's language in naturalistic contexts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation.Child Development, 48, 986–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies.Child Development, 50, 643–655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, K. H., Marshall, J., & Oskamp, S. (1972). Testimony validity as a function of question form, atmosphere, and item difficulty.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, M. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior.Behavioral Research Methods and Instruments, 1, 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1971). Verbal and nonverbal interaction of strangers in a waiting situation.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1972).Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellinkoff, D. (1963).The language of the law. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moston, S. (1987). The suggestibility of children in interview studies.First Language, 7, 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moston, S. (1992). Social support and children's eyewitness testimony. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds.),Children as witnesses. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moston, S., & Engleberg, T. (1992). The effects of social support on children's eyewitness testimony.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, C. S. (1989).Major psychological assessment instruments, Vol. 2. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Barr, W. M. (1981). The language of the law. In C. A. Ferguson & S. B. Health (Eds.),Language in the U.S.A. (pp. 386–406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Barr, W. M. (1982).Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1979). What child language can contribute to pragmatics. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.),Developmental pragmatics (pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L., & Edinger, J. A. (1987). A functional analysis of space in social interaction. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Nonverbal behavior and communication, 2d. ed. (pp. 523–562). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N. W., McAuliff, B. D., Tam, P., Claycomb, L., Dostal, C., & Flanagan, C. (1994).When lawyers question children: Is justice served? Unpublished manuscript, Creighton University.

  • Perry, N. W., & Wrightsman, L. (1991).The child witness: Legal issues and dilemmas. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, R. D. (1993). Dysfunctional families in dysfunctional systems? Why child advocacy centers may not be enough.Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968).Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and student intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, L., & Goodman, G. S. (1991). Effects of participation on children's reports: Implications for children's testimony.Developmental Psychology, 27, 527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., Nicholas, E., & Moan, S. (1991). Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 682–691.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1993). Improving children's testimony with preparation. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.),Understanding and improving children's testimony, pp. 147–168. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1986). Experimentally provided social support.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1222–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (Eds.) (1990).Social support: An interactional view. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegman, A. W. (1987). The telltale voice: Nonverbal messages of verbal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Nonverbal behavior and communication, 2d ed. (pp. 351–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, E. (1993). A rose by any name would smell as sweet: Enhancing the functioning child advocacy center.Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2, 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990).You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardy, C. H. (1994). Counteracting task-induced stress: Studies of instrumental and emotional support in problem-solving contexts. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.),Communication of social support (pp. 71–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwager, R., & Wakefield, H. (1990).The real world of child interrogations. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venzor, E. (1980).The effects of client nonverbal behaviors and problem severity upon clinical judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1934/1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. G. (1987). Linguistic manipulation, power, and the legal setting. In Leah Kedar (Ed.),Power through discourse (pp. 57–80). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. G. (1993). Questioning young children in court: A linguistic case study.Law and Human Behavior, 17, 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. G. (1994).Handbook on questioning children: A linguistic perspective. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, J., Kelly, R., Oliveri, M. K., & McCord, J. (1993).Behind the playground walls: Sexual abuse in preschools. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J. (1982). Language development. In B. B. Wolman & G. Stricker (Eds.),Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 367–386). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuille, J. C., Hunter, R., Joffe, R., & Zaparniuk, J. (1993). Interviewing children in sexual abuse cases. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.),Understanding and improving children's testimony (pp. 95–115). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA

    Cathleen A. Carter & Murray Levine

  2. Department of Psychology (M/C 285), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison St., 60607-7137, Chicago, IL

    Bette L. Bottoms

Authors
  1. Cathleen A. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bette L. Bottoms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Murray Levine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bette L. Bottoms.

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, C.A., Bottoms, B.L. & Levine, M. Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. Law Hum Behav 20, 335–358 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499027

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499027

Keywords

Search

Navigation