Skip to main content
Log in

The electoral connection in Australia: Candidate roles, campaign activity, and the popular vote

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of representational roles usually examine elected representatives rather than election candidates and make little attempt to link roles with either behavior or the popular vote that candidates attract. In this paper, we use 1990 Australian data to examine all major party election candidates, and show that candidates identify with three types of representational roles:locals, who focus on articulating local concerns and interests;partisans, who see their role in party political terms; andlegislators, who emphasize the parliamentary role of an elected representative. Incumbents, especially party leaders, focus on the partisan role. Candidates in each of these three types have different views of the qualities that a candidate should possess and emphasize different forms of campaign activity. In turn, these roles have a modest impact on the popular vote that candidates attract, net of other factors. In Australia, incumbents rely on national partisan forces for reelection, while challengers rely much more on their own efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitkin, D. (1977).Stability and Change in Australian Politics. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. R. and L. L. M. Bennett (1991). “The Quest for a Congressional Seat: Nonincumbent Candidates in the 1990 U.S. House Primary Elections.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

  • Barnes, S. H. (1977).Representation in Italy. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C. (1990). “The Personal Vote in Australian Federal Elections.”Political Studies 38: 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. G., and C. M. Price (1975).The First Term: A Study of Legislative Socialization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. A. (1989).Elections, Representation and Congressional Voting Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochel, J., and D. Denver (1983). “Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek.”British Journal of Political Science 13: 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, B., J. Ferejohn, and M. Fiorina (1987).The Personal Vote. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. (1985).Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carty, R. K. (1981).Party and Parish Pump: Electoral Politics in Ireland Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, B. (1982).The Government and Politics of Ireland, 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H. D. (1978). “Determinants of Provincial Constituency Service Behavior: A Multivariate Analysis.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 3: 601–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H. D., and R. G. Price (1981). “Parliamentary Experience and Representative Role Orientations in Canada.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 3: 601–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E., and R. Pierce (1986).Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, H., and P. D. Karps (1977). “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Representativeness.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 2: 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1978).Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1989).The Making of a Senator: Dan Quayle. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishel, J. (1973).Party and Opposition. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, L. L. (1980). “Candidate Perceptions of Electoral Coalitions.”American Politics Quarterly 8: 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, L. L., and R. D. McClure (1989).Political Ambition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, E. N., and M. W. Traugott (1984).Campaigning for Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. A. (1978). “Representative Styles and Legislative Behavior.”Western Political Quarterly 31: 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., and John A. Jackson (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, R. D., and H. P. Friesema (1972). “Representatives' Perceptions of Constituency Opinion.”Journal of Politics 34: 730–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnson P. S. (1988).Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, M. R. (1974).The Making of Campaign Strategy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, M. R. (1984),Running for Office. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J. R. (1991).Congressional Careers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J. R., and D. Marsh (1987). “Accounting for the Voting Patterns of British MPs on Free Votes.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 12: 275–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckshorn, R. J., and R. C. Spencer (1971).The Politics of Defeat. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, P. A. (1989). “Partisan Representation and the Failure of Realignment in the 1980s.”American Journal of Political Science 33: 240–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell (1983).Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaensch, Dean (1983).The Australian Party System. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, Malcolm E. (1970). “Attitudinal Determinants of Legislative Behavior: The Utility of Role Analysis.” In A. Kornberg and L. Musolf (eds.),Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, Malcolm E. (1985). “Legislators and Constituents in the Representative Process.” In Gerhard Loewenberg, Samuel C. Patterson, and Malcolm E. Jewell (eds.),Handbook of Legislative Research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Richard (1980).A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, Dennis (1970).Constituency Electioneering in Britain. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazee, T. (1980). “The Decision to Run for the U.S. Congress: Challenger Attitudes in the 1970s.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 5: 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. L. (1970). “Political Attitudes of Defeated Candidates in an American State Election.”American Political Science Review 64: 879–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. L., and Samuel C. Patterson (1988) “Parliamentary Elite Integration in Six Nations.”Comparative Politics 20: 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., and D. P. Racheter (1973). “Candidates' Perception of Voter Competence: A Comparison of Winning and Losing Candidates.”American Political Science Review 67: 906–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. (1968).Candidates for Office: Beliefs and Strategies. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornberg, Allan (1967).Canadian Parliamentary Behavior. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold, D. (1968).Electioneering in a Democracy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenberg, Gerhard, Samuel C. Patterson, and Malcolm E. Jewell (eds.) (1985).Handbook of Legislative Research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris (1989). “Selecting Women Candidates: Obstacles to the Feminisation of the House of Commons.”European Journal of Political Research 17: 533–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisel, Louis S. (1982).From Obscurity to Oblivion. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, David R. (1985). “Legislative Recruitment and Legislative Careers.” In Gerhard Loewenberg, Samuel C. Patterson, and Malcolm E. Jewell (eds.),Handbook of Legislative Research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, David (1974).Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, Ian (1992). “Party Adaptation and Factionalism in Australia.”American Journal Political Science 35: 206–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, Ian (1992).Political Behaviour: Citizen, Parties and Elites in Australia. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, Ian, and Donley T. Studlar (1992). “Gender and Representation Among Legislative Candidates in Australia.”Comparative Political Studies 25: 388–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezey, M. L. (1979).Comparative Legislatures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, William E., and Donald E. Stokes (1963). “Constituency Influence in Congress.”American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Ken (1974). “Role Orientations and Their Sources Among Elected Representatives in English Local Politics.”Journal of Politics 36: 615–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, R. K. Carty, L. Erickson, Joni Lovenduski, and Marian Simms (1990). “Party Selectorates in Australia, Britain and Canada: Prolegomena for Research in the 1990s.”Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 28: 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Philip (1985). “Behavioural Changes: Backbench Independence in the 1980s.” In: P. Norton (ed.),Parliament in the 1980s. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. R. (1986).Homeward Bound: Explaining Changes in Congressional Behavior. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Samuel C. (1989). “Understanding the British Parliament.”Political Studies 37: 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. L., O. H. Woshinsky, E. P. Veblen, W. H. Coogan, and G. E. Bigler (1984).The Motivation of Politicians. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, Kenneth (1970).The Recruitment of Political Leaders: A Study of Citizen-Politicians. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdale, L. (1985). “Legislative Elections and Electoral Responsiveness.” In Gerhard Loewenberg, Samuel C. Patterson, and Malcolm E. Jewell (eds.),Handbook of Legislative Research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, Austin (1965).Pathways to Parliament. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Jorgen (1984). “Is Parliament Revolting?” In Donley T. Studlar and J. L. Waltman (eds.),Dilemmas of Change in British Politics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searing, Donald D. (1985). “The Role of the Good Constituency Member and the Practice of Representation in Great Britain.”Journal of Politics 47:348–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searing, Donald D. (1986). “A Theory of Political Socialization: Institutional Support and Deradicalization.”British Journal of Political Science 16: 341–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searing, Donald D. (1987). “New Roles for Post-War British Politics: Ideologues, Generalists, Specialists, and the Progress of Professionalization in Parliament.”Comparative Politics 19: 431–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searing, Donald D. (1991). “Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism.”American Political Science Review 85: 1239–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen, Henry (1966). “The Recruitment of Parliamentary Nominees in Norway.”Scandinavian Political Studies 1: 121–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlke, John C., Heinz Eulau W. Buchanan, and L. C. Ferguson (1962).The Legislative System. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, John S., and Paul R. Wilson (1973). “Politics: Participation and Attitudes.” In Henry Mayer and Helen Nelson (eds.),Australian Politics: A Third Reader, Melbourne: Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, John S., F. M. B. Cass, and Rosemary J. Whip (1980). “The Electorate: Voting, Issues and Political Knowledge.” In Margaret B. Cribb and Peter J. Boyce (eds.),Politics in Queensland. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woshinsky, O. H. (1973).The French Deputy. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Studlar, D.T., McAllister, I. The electoral connection in Australia: Candidate roles, campaign activity, and the popular vote. Polit Behav 16, 385–410 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498957

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498957

Keywords

Navigation