Skip to main content
Log in

Influences shaping members' decision making: Congressional voting on the Persian Gulf War

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I examine what influences members viewed as shaping their voting decisions on U.S. strategy in the Persian Gulf in January 1991. Rather than focusing on predictors of votes and the outcomes of members' decision-making processes (the yea or nay votes as in roll-call analyses), I focus on the predominant considerations that members perceived as swaying voting choices. More specifically, drawing on data gathered from interviews with 365 congressional staff people, I show that three influences in particular stand out as significant in the decision-making process on this crisis policy: members' own policy views, supportive constituents, and (for certain groups of members) the president. Thus, while the analysis confirms, in part, the conventional view of legislators' personal policy assessments as the critical influence on foreign and defense policy votes, it also underscores that this influence does not operate in a vacuum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, John H., John L. Sullivan, and Eugene Borgida (1989). “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates Waltz Before a Blind Audience?”American Political Science Review 83: 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Larry M. (1991). “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.”American Political Science Review 85: 457–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Raymond A., Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis A. Dexter (1972),American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade, 2nd ed. Chicago: Aldine Atherton, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Robert A., and William W. Anthony (1974). “The ABM Issue in the Senate, 1968–1970: The Importance of Ideology.”American Political Science Review 68: 1198–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Jon R., and Richard Fleisher (1990).The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, Charles S. (1976). “Motivations for U.S. Congressional Committee Preferences: Freshmen of the 92nd Congress.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 1: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Eileen (1991). “Representatives' Decisions on Participation in Foreign Policy Issues.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 521–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Eileen (1993). “The Influence of Constituents: Congressional Decision Making on Issues of Foreign and Defense Policy.” In Randall B. Ripley and James M. Lindsay (eds.),Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Eileen. “Representatives’ Involvement in Foreign and Defense Policy Topics: Do Issue-Related Factors Affect Decision Making?” Under review.

  • Carter, Ralph G. (1989). “Senate Defense Budgeting, 1981–1988: The Impacts of Ideology, Party, and Constituency Benefit on the Decision to Support the President.”American Politics Quarterly 17: 332–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, Aage (1973).How Congressmen Decide. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Quarterly Inc. (1991a). “Congress Approves Resolution Authorizing Use of Force.”Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 12 January.

  • Congressional Quarterly Inc. (1991b). “Party Unity and Party Opposition: House.”Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 28 December.

  • Cook, Rhodes, Ronald D. Elving, and CQ Research Staff (1991). “Even Votes of Conscience Follow Party Lines.”Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 19 January.

  • Doherty, Carroll J. (1991). “Bush Is Given Authorization to Use Force Against Iraq.”Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 12 January.

  • Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps (1977). “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 2: 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard F., Jr. (1973).Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard F., Jr. (1978).Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard F., Jr. (1982).The United States Senate: A Bicameral Perspective. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, Pamela (1990). “Bush Quiets His Critics on Hill by Sending Baker to Iraq.”Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 1 December.

  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1974).Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, Richard (1985). “Economic Benefit, Ideology, and Senate Voting on the B-1 Bomber.”American Politics Quarterly 13: 200–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, Richard (1993). “PAC Contributions and Congressional Voting on National Defense.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, David P., and Susan Welch (1986). “Human Rights Voting in Congress.”Policy Studies Journal 15: 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, John R. (1991). “Contours of the Modern Congressional Career.”American Political Science Review 85: 405–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. (1989).Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 3d ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, David C. (1982). “Decision-making on Roll Call Votes in the House of Representatives.”Congress and the Presidency 9: 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeoGrande, William M., and Philip Brenner (1993). “The House Divided: Ideological Polarization Over Aid to the Nicaraguan ‘Contras.’”Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, James M. (1990). “Parochialism, Policy, and Constituency Constraints: Congressional Voting on Strategic Weapons Systems.”American Journal of Political Science 34: 936–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, James M. (1991). “Testing the Parochial Hypothesis: Congress and the Strategic Defense Initiative.”Journal of Politics 53: 860–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, James M., and Randall B. Ripley (1993). “How Congress Influences Foreign and Defense Policy.” In Randall B. Ripley and James M. Lindsay (eds.),Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, James [1787] (1969).Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Thomas E., and Raymond E. Wolfinger (1980). “Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections.”American Political Science Review 74: 617–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Donald R., and James A. Stimson (1975).Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, James M. (1985). “Congressional Voting on the Nuclear Freeze Resolutions.”American Politics Quarterly 13: 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, James M., and Michael Black (1983). “Ideology and Voting on the Panama Canal Treaties.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 8: 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes (1963). “Constituency Influence in Congress.”American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overby, L. Marvin (1991). “Assessing Constituency Influence: Congressional Voting on the Nuclear Freeze, 1982–83.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Samuel C., and Gregory A. Caldiera (1988). “Party Voting in the United States Congress.”British Journal of Political Science 18: 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Keith T. (1988). “Recent Developments in Analytical Models of Voting in the U.S. Congress.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 13: 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, Randall B., and Grace A. Franklin (1991).Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, William (1991). “Public Backs Gulf War as Last Option.”National Journal, 12 January.

  • Sinclair, Barbara (1993). “Congressional Party Leaders in the Foreign and Defense Policy Arena.” In Randall B. Ripley and James M. Lindsay (eds.),Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi (1988).Vital Statistics on American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Donald E., and Warren E. Miller (1962). “Party Government and the Saliency of Congress.”Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Martin (1985). “Election Proximity and Senatorial Roll Call Voting.”American Journal of Political Science 29: 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Rosita M. (1991). “American Public Opinion on the Iraq-Kuwait Crisis until January 15.” In aCRS Report for Congress, 91-109 GOV, 16 January.

  • Tierney, John T. (1993). “Interest Group Involvement in Congressional Foreign and Defense Policy.” In Randall B. Ripley and James M. Lindsay (eds.),Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twight, Charlotte (1990). “DOD Attempts to Close Military Bases: The Political Economy of Congressional Resistance.” In Robert Higgs (ed.),Arms, Politics, and the Economy: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Congress. Senate.Congressional Record. 102nd Cong., 1st sess., 10 January 1991, 12 January 1991. Vol. 137.

  • Wayman, Frank W. (1985). “Arms Control and Strategic Arms Voting in the U.S. Senate.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 29: 225–251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burgin, E. Influences shaping members' decision making: Congressional voting on the Persian Gulf War. Polit Behav 16, 319–342 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498954

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498954

Keywords

Navigation