Abstract
Despite the increasingly liberal cast of the national Democratic Party, self-identified conservatives continue to represent a significant segment of the party. At least 25 percent of Democratic identifiers considered themselves to be conservatives during the 1972–1988 period. This paper explores the puzzle of why significant numbers of political conservatives continue to identify with the Democratic Party. We argue that conservative Democrats relate to their party not because of political ideology, as do Republicans and to a lesser extent, liberal/moderate Democrats, but because of the symbolic values associated with the main groups in the party—what we refer to as “party ethos.” This proposition is examined by analyzing a new set of open-ended questions included in the 1988 American National Election Study probing citizens' images and assessments of the Republican and Democratic parties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Carmines, Edward G., and Harold W. Stanley (1990). Ideological realignment in the contemporary South: Where have all the conservatives gone? in Robert P. Steed, Laurence W. Moreland, and Tod A. Baker (eds.),The Disappearing South: Studies in Regional Change and Continuity. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1989).Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Stanley Feldman (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications.American Journal of Political Science 25: 1617–645.
Drucker, H. M. (1979).Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour Party. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Edsall, Thomas Byrne, with Mary D. Edsall (1991).Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Freeman, Jo (1986). The political culture of the Democratic and Republican parties.Political Science Quarterly 101: 327–356.
Levitin, Teresa E., and Warren E. Miller (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections.American Political Science Review 73: 751–771.
Miller, Warren E. (1988).Without Consent: Mass-Elite Linkages in Presidential Politics, Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Miller, Warren E., and M. Kent Jennings, with Barbara G. Farah (1986).Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Miller, Warren E., and the National Election Studies (1989).American National Election Study, 1988: Pre- and Post-Election Survey. Conducted by the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Phillips, Kevin (1991).The Politics of Rich and Poor. New York: Harper Perennial.
Polsby, Nelson W., and Aaron Wildavsky (1991).Presidential Elections: Contemporary Strategies of American Electoral Politics, 8th ed. New York: The Free Press.
Shafer, Byron (1986). Republicans and Democrats as social types: Or, notes toward an ethnography of the political parties.Journal of American Studies 20: 341–354.
White, John Kenneth (1990).The New Politics of Old Values. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The data utilized in this paper were made available by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. The data forAmerican National Election Study 1988: Pre- and Post-Election Survey were originally collected by Warren E. Miller and the National Election Studies. Neither the collector of the original data nor the Consortium bears any responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carmines, E.G., Berkman, M. Ethos, ideology, and partisanship: Exploring the paradox of conservative democrats. Polit Behav 16, 203–218 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498877
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498877
Keywords
- Main Group
- Political Ideology
- Democratic Party
- National Election
- Election Study