Skip to main content
Log in

A normal vote approach to electoral change: Presidential elections, 1828–1984

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article offers a macro-level approach to a core concept in the study of electroral behavior, the normal vote. The approach uses interrupted time-series analysis and focuses upon electorally homogeneous political regions within states. After developing the approach used to generate normal vote estimates, analyses using those estimates are compared with (1) parallel analyses using survey-based research, and (2) across levels of analysis (national, regional). The comparison with survey-based analyses show that the macro-level measure follows the actual vote more closely and is more sensitive to shortterm influences. Comparisons across levels of analysis demonstrate that national level analyses obscure a volatile, dynamic electorate that exists at the regional level. These findings suggest that the creative use of the macro-level measure at the regional level has the potential to contribute new and important insights into the role of citizens in American politics, and the forces that drive the behavior of the electorate. Its particular strengths lie in the study of electoral change and its ability to contribute toward a developmental perspective on American democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Paul R., and Charles W. Ostrom Jr. (1992). Response.American Political Science Review 86: 481–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R. and Charles W. Ostrom Jr. (1991). Macropartisanship: An empirical reassessment.

  • Aldenderfer, Mark S., and Roger K. Blashfield (1984).Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., and G. C. Tiao (1975). Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems.Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Walter Dean (1970).Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Walter Dean (1991). Critical realignment: Dead or alive. In Byron, Schafer (ed.),The End of Realignment? Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960).The American Voter New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward, and James A. Stimson (1989).Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clubb, Jerome M., William H. Flanigan, and Nancy H. Zingale (1980).Partisan Realignment: Voters Parties, and Government in American History. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1966). The concept of a normal vote. In Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes (eds),Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel J. (1970),Cities of the Prairie. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, John H. (1957),Politics in the Border States. New Orleans: Hauser Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, John H. (1966).Midwest Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1990). The electorate in the voting booth. In L. Sandy Maisal (ed.),The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, John (1984).Time-Series Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague (1993). Citizens, contexts, and politics. In Ada Finifter (ed.),Political Science: The State of The Discipline (2nd Ed.). Washington, D.C.: APSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1949).Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1955). A theory of critical elections.Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleppner, Paul (ed.) (1981).The Evolution of American Electoral Systems. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, Jan E. and Jonathan Nagler (1992). Socioeconomic bias in turnout 1964–1988: The voters remain the same.American Political Science Review 86: 725–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockard, Duane (1959).New England State Politics. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorr, Maurice (1987).Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists., San Francisco: Josey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erickson, and James A. Stimson (1989). Macropartisanship.American Political Science Review 83: 1125–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erickson, and James A. Stimson, (1992). Question wording and macropartisanship.American Political Science Review 86: 475–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erickson, and James A. Stimson (1992a). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy.American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleary, Richard, and Richard A. Hay, Jr. (1980).Applied Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, David, Richard McCleary, Erroll E. Meidinger, and Richard A. Hay, Jr. (1980).Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren (1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to basics,American Political Science Review 85: 557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardulli, Peter F. (1989). Geo-political cleavages, conflict and the American states. InDiversity, Conflict, and State Politics, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardulli, Peter F. (1995). The concept of a critical realignment, electoral behavior, and political change.American Political Science Review (forthcoming).

  • Petrocik, John R. (1989). An expected party vote: New data for an old concept.American Journal of Political Science 33: 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, Byron E. (1991).The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, Byron E. (1991a). The notion of an electoral order. In Byron Shafer (ed.),The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Orders. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shively, W. Phillips (1992). From differential abstention to conversion: A change in electoral change, 1864–1988.American Journal of Political Science 36: 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbey, Joel H. (1991).The American Political Nation, 1838–1893. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundquist, James L. (1973).Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P. (1990).The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1988. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nardulli, P.F. A normal vote approach to electoral change: Presidential elections, 1828–1984. Polit Behav 16, 467–503 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498827

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498827

Keywords

Navigation