Abstract
This article explores public opinion formation in reaction to the controversial nominations of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court. When asked to justify their approval or disapproval of these well-recognized nominees, an interesting pattern emerged. Citizens opposed to the nominations tended to cast their arguments in terms of ideology and specific issues. Supporters, however, called attention to the nominee's character, abilities, achievements, or some notion of deference to the president. We speculate that this asymmetry in responses is traceable to the content of the elite debate. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for presidential nomination strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABC News/Washington Post Bork Vote Poll, October 1987.
Abelson, Robert P., Donald R. Kinder, Donald R. Peters, Mark D. Fiske, and Susan Fiske (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42:619–630.
Abraham, Henry (1992),Justices and Presidents: A Political History of Appointments to the Supreme Court, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Roy Behr, and Shanto Iyengar (1993)The Media Game. New York: Macmillan.
Caldeira, Gregory A. (1986) Neither the purse nor the sword: the dynamics of public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court.American Political Science Review 80:1209–1226.
Caldeira, Gregory A. (1991). Courts and public opinion. In John B. Gates and Charles Johnson (eds.),The American Courts: A Critcal Assessment: Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and James L. Gibson (1992). The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court.American Journal of Political Science 36:635–664.
Cameron, Charles M., Albert D. Cover, and Jeffrey A. Segal (1990). Senate voting on Supreme Court nominees: A neoinstitutional model.American Political Science Review 84:525–534.
Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes (1960).The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
Casey, Gregory (1976). Popular perceptions of Supreme Court rulings.American Politics Quarterly 4:3–45.
CBS News/New York Times Clarence Thomas Nomination Poll, September–October 1991.
Conover, Pamela, and Stanley Feldman, (1984). How people organize the political world: a schematic model.American Journal of Political Science 28:95–126.
Converse, Philip (1962) Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly 26:578–599.
Cortner, Richard (1981).The Supreme Court and the Second Bill of Right: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Nationalization of Civil Liberties. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Dolbeare, Kenneth, and Phillip E. Hammond (1968). The political party basis of attitudes toward the Supreme Court.Public Opinion Quarterly 37:16–30.
Epstein, Lee, and Joseph F Kobylka (1992).The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Felice, John D., and Herbert F. Weisberg (1989). The changing importance of ideology, party and region in confirmation of Supreme Court nominees, 1953–1988.Kentucky Law Journal, 77:509–530.
Friedman, Richard D. (1983). The transformation in Senate response to Supreme Court nominations: from reconstruction to the Taft administration and beyond.Cardozo Law Review 5:1–95.
Geer, John (1991). Do open-ended questions measure “salient” issues.Public Opinion Quarterly 55:360–370.
Hagner, Paul, and John C. Pierce (1982). Correlative characteristics of levels of conceptualization in the American public: 1956–1976.Journal of Politics 44:779–807.
Hearst Corporation (1987).The American Public's Knowledge of the U.S. Constitution. New York: The Hearst Corporation.
Holm, John D., and John P. Robinson (1978). Ideological identification and the American voter.Public Opinion Quarterly 42:235–246.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald Kinder (1987).News That Matters: Television and American Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacoby, William G. (1988). The impact of party identification on issue attitudes.American Journal of Political Science 32:643–661.
Jacoby, William G. (1989). The sources of liberal-conservative thinking: education and conceptualization.Political Behavior 10:316–332.
Jacoby, William G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes.American Journal of Political Science 35:178–205.
Jennings, M. Kent (1993). Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites.Public Opinion Quarterly 56:419–441.
Kelley, Stanley (1983).Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kessel, John H. (1966) Public perceptions of the Supreme Court.Midwest Journal of Political Science 10:167–191.
Kinder, Donald R., and R. P. Abelson (1981). Appraising presidential candidates: personality and affect in the 1980 campaign. Paper delivered at the 1981 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York September 3–6.
Knight, Kathleen (1985). Ideology in the 1980 election: ideological sophistication does matterJournal of Politics 47:828–853.
Levitin, Teresa E., and Warren E. Miller (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections.American Political Science Review 73:751–771.
Lodge, Milton, and Ruth Hamill (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing.American Political Science Review 82:737–761.
MacKuen, Michael (1984). Exposure to information, belief integration and individual responsiveness to agenda change.American Political Science Review 78:372–391.
Mansbridge, Jane J. (1986).Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.
Marshall, Thomas (1989).Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. New York: Longman.
Massaro, John (1990).Supremely Political. Albany State University of New York Press.
Massey, Calvin R. (1991). Getting there: a brief history of the politics of Supreme Court appointments.Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 19:1–21.
Miller, Arthur H., Martin P. Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates.American Political Science Review 80:505–540.
Miller, Warren E., and Teresa Levitin (1977).Leadership and Change. Cambridge, MA: Winthorp Press.
Murphy, Bruce Allen (1988).Fortas: The Rise and Ruin of a Supreme Court Justice. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
Murphy, Walter F., and C. Herman Pritchett (1986).Courts, Judges and Politics: An Introduction to Judicial Process, 4th ed. New York: Random House.
Murphy, Walter F., and Joseph Tanenhaus (1968). Public opinion and the Supreme Court: the Goldwater campaign.Public Opinion Quarterly 32:32–50.
Ottati, Victor C., Marco R. Steenbergen, and Ellen Riggle (1991). The cognitive and affective components of political attitudes: measuring the determinants of candidate evaluations.Political Behavior 14:423–442.
Overby, Marvin L., Beth M. Henschen, Julie Strauss, and Michael H. Walsh (1992). Courting constituents? An analysis of the Senate confirmation vote on justice Clarence Thomas.American Political Science Review 86:997–1003.
Page, Benjamin, Robert Y. Shapiro, and Glenn R. Dempsey (1987). Television news and changes in Americans' policy preferences.American Political Science Review 83:23–44.
Price, Vincent (1989). Social identification and public opinion.Public Opinion Quarterly 53:197–224.
Rahn, Wendy (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates.American Journal of Political Science 37:472–496.
Reagan fills vacancy on third attempt (1987).Congressional Quarterly Almanac. Washington, DC: Congressional Quaterly, pp. 271–276.
Riggle, Ellen D., Victor C. Ottati, Robert S. Wyer, James Kuklinski, and Norbert Schwarz (1991). Bases of political judgments: the role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information.Political Behavior 14:67–87.
Rosenberg, S. W., and P. McCafferty (1987). The image and the vote: manipulating voters' preferences.Public Opinion Quartely 51:31–47.
Segal, Jeffrey A. (1987). Senate confirmation of supreme court justices: partisan and institutional politics.Journal of Politics, 49:998–1015.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth (1993).The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., Charles M. Cameron, and Albert D. Cover (1992). A spatial model of roll call voting: senators, constituents, presidents and interest groups in Supreme Court confirmationsAmerican Journal of Political Science 36:96–121.
Segal, Jeffrey A., Albert D. Cover, and Charles M. Cameron (1989). Senate confirmation of Supreme Court justices.Kentucky Law Journal 77:485–544.
Staggenborg, Suzanne (1991).The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sulfridge, Wayne (1980). Ideology as a factor in Senate consideration of Supreme Court nominations.Journal of Politics 43:560–567.
Woodward, Bob, and Scott Armstrong (1979).The Brethrenn. New York: Avon Books.
Zaller, John (1991). Information, values and opinion.American Political Science Review 85:1215–1238.
Zaller, John (1992).The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gimpel, J.G., Ringel, L.S. Understanding court nominee evaluation and approval: Mass opinion in the Bork and Thomas cases. Polit Behav 17, 135–153 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498811
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498811