Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competing values in public opinion: A conjoint analysis

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Values have been conceptualized as inherently comparative and competitive. As such they require the setting of priorities and value trade-offs, and we suggest that conjoint analysis provides an appropriate operationalization of values so conceptualized. Compared to the commonly used rating and ranking methods, conjoint analysis is less obtrusive and its task design simulates real-life considerations more closely. We suggest that it provides value importance scores that are more realistic, less abstract, less declarative, and less tainted by social desirability. Moreover, conjoint measurement offers a fuller description of value systems, including value balancing and weighting, combinations, and interactions among values. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of conjoint analysis in the measurement of values, and apply it to competing values in current Israeli politics. This analysis yields new findings on the value structure of Israeli Jews. We find that two values override in Israeli Jews' considerations: the most basic notion of Zionism—Israel as a Jewish state with a Jewish majority—and peace. Democracy is found to have no significance on its own, but in interaction with the other values that count, it is cherished. Greater Israel has only marginal significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, Icek (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. InAttitude Structure and Function, Anthony R. Pratkanis, Steven J. Breckler, and Anthony G. Greenwald, eds., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 241–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaah, Ishmael P., and Pradeep K. Korgaonkar (1988). A conjoint investigation of the relative importance of risk relievers in direct marketing.Journal of Advertising Research 28: 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, Duane F., and Jon A. Krosnik (1985). The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings.Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 535–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Norman H. (1970). Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment.Psychological Review. 78: 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Norman H. (1981).Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Norman H. (1982).Methods of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Norman H. (ed.) (1991).Contributions to Information Integration Theory, vols. I and II. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arian, Asher (1992). Security and political attitudes in Israel: 1986–1991.Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, Sharon E. et al. (1985). Alternative measurement approaches to consumer values: The list of values and the Rokeach value survey.Psychology & Marketing 2: 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenisti, Meron (1988).The Sling and the Club. Jerusalem: Keter (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, Raymond B. (1944). Psychological measurement: Ipsative, normative and interactive.Psychological Review 51: 292–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattin, Philippe, and Dick R. Wittink (1982). Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey.Journal of Marketing 46: 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Harold D., and Nitish Dutt (1991). Measuring value change in Western industrialized societies: The impact of unemployment.American Political Science Review 85(3): 905–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Erik (1989a). Citizenship, nationality and religion in Israel and Thailand. InThe Israeli State and Society: Boundaries and Frontiers, Baruch Kimmerling, ed. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 66–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Erik (1989b). The changing legitimations of the State of Israel.Studies in Contemporary Jewry 5: 148–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dershowitz, Alan M. (1971). Preventive detention of citizens during a national emergency: A comparison between Israel and the United States.Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 1: 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diskin, Avraham (1980). The 1977 interparty distances: A three level analysis. InThe Elections in Israel−1977, Asher Arian, ed. Jerusalem: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1975).Values in Education and Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor, Itzhak (1980). Transformation in the Israeli political system since the Yom Kippur War. InThe Elections in Israel−1977, Asher Arian, ed. Jerusalem: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor, Itzhak (1982).Steering the Polity. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorny, Yosef (1985).The Arab Question and the Jewish Problem. Tel-Aviv: Am Oved (in Hebrew; translated by Chaya Galai,Zionism and the Arabs, 1882–1948. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E. (1974). On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives.Journal of Consumer Research 1: 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E., Abba M. Krieger, and Pardeep Bansal (1988). Completely unacceptable levels in conjoint analysis: A cautionary note.Journal of Marketing Research 25: 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E., and V. Srinivasan (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook.Journal of Consumer Research 5: 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E., and V. Srinivasan (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice.Journal of Marketing 54: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E., and Yoram Wind (1973).Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing: A Measurement Approach. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, Louis (1978).The Israel Public, Peace and Territory: The Impact of the Sadat Initiative. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Federal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkabi, Yehoshafat (1986).Israel's Fateful Decisions. Tel-Aviv: Am Oved (in Hebrew, translated by Lenn Schramm, London: I. B. Tauris, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Lou E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative and forced-choice normative measures.Psychological Bulletin 74: 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Dan, and Moshe Lissak (1978).Origins of the Israeli Polity: Palestine Under the Mandate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Elihu (1988). Forty nine percent lean towards “transfer” of ArabsJerusalem Post International Edition, August 20.

  • Kelly, Karen, Bernie I. Silverman and Raymond Cochrane (1972). Social desirability and the Rokeach value survey.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 6: 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerling, Baruch (1983).Zionism and Territory. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerling, Baruch (1985). Between the primordial and the civil definitions of the collective identity: “Eretz Israel or the State of Israel?” InComparative Social Dynamics, Erik Cohen et al., eds. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 262–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Noreen M. (1986). Assessing unacceptable attribute levels in conjont analysis. InAdvances in Consumer Research, vol. 14, Melanie Wallendorf and Paul Anderson, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, Clyde (1951). Values and value orientations in the theory of action. InToward a General Theory of Action, Talcott Parsons and Edward. A Shills, eds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnik, Jon A., and Duane F. Alwin (1988). A test of the form-resistant correlation hypothesis: Ratings, rankings and the measurement of values.Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 526–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, Charles S., and Eliezer Don-Yehiya (1983).Civil Religion in Israel: Traditional Judaism and Political Culture in the Jewish State. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, Jordan L. (1988).Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustick, Ian (1980).Arabs in the Jewish State: Israel's Control of a National Minority. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, Raj, William L. Moore, and Teresa M. Pavia (1992). An examination of the use of unacceptable levels in conjoint analysis.Journal of Consumer Research 19: 470–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael (1975). Rating versus ranking in the Rokeach value survey: An Israeli comparison.European Journal of Social Psychology 5: 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore William L., and Morris B. Holbrook (1990). Conjoint analysis on objects with environmentally correlated attributes: The questionable importance of representative design.Journal of Consumer Research 16: 490–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, Robert M. (1979). The use of Pearson'sR with ordinal data.American Sociological Review 44: 851–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, Yoav (1992). Ethnic democracy and the legal construction of citizenship: Arab citizens of the Jewish state.American Political Science Review 86: 432–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, William L., and Joel W. Grube (1980). A comparison of ranking and rating procedures for value system measurement.European Journal of Social Psychology 10: 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton (1970).Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton (1973).The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton (ed.) (1979).Understanding Human Values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton, and Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities: 1968–1981.American Psychologist 44(5): 775–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter H., and Steven L. Nock (eds.) (1982).Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Amnon (1991).The Constitutional Law of the State of Israel, 4th ed. Jerusalem: Schocken (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Shalom H., and Wolfgang Bilsky (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 878–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, Michal (1986). Realignment in the Israeli party system. InThe Elections in Israel−1984, Asher Arian and Michal Shamir, eds., New Brunswick: Transaction, pp. 267–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, Michal, and Asher Arian (1992). Competing values and policy choices: Israeli public opinion on foreign and security affairs. Discussion paper 4-92, The Sapir Center for Development, Tel-Aviv University.

  • Shapiro, Yonathan (1977).Democracy in Israel. Ramat Gan: Massada (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smooha, Sammy (1990). Minority status in an ethnic democracy: The status of the Arab minority in Israel.Ethnic and Racial Studies 13(3): 389–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M. (1993). The new look in public opinion research. InPolitical Science: The State of the Discipline, Ada W. Finifter, ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Donald E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition.American Political Science Review 57: 368–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, Philip E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(4): 819–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock Philip E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. InAttitude Structure and Function, Anthony R. Pratkanis, Steven J. Breckler, and Anthony G. Greenwald, eds. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, Dick R., and Philippe Cattin (1989). Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update.Journal of Marketing 53: 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Political Science, Tel-Aviv University, 69978, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Michal Shamir

  2. Communication and Journalism, Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, 91905, Jerusalem, Israel

    Jacob Shamir

Authors
  1. Michal Shamir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob Shamir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shamir, M., Shamir, J. Competing values in public opinion: A conjoint analysis. Polit Behav 17, 107–133 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498786

Keywords

Search

Navigation