Skip to main content
Log in

Participation in local politics in Norway: Some do, some don't; some will, some won't

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using data from two national surveys conducted in 1990 and 1993, this article investigates seven modes of sociopolitical behavior and one form of potential political participation in the context of Norwegian local government. Results indicate that factors associated with alternative modes of activity vary; different types of people tend to choose different channels of involvement. The most pronounced difference is found between activities directed toward influencing public opinion and those intended to influence political decision making more directly. Whereas the former mode is more typically chosen by younger, well-educated single women living in urban areas, the latter is more characteristic of married, better educated men living in smaller municipalities. Findings are characterized by a high degree of stability over the period considered. Only in the case of voting is there a suggestion of some possible change. After decades in which socioeconomic status variables have been of little significance for voting in Norway (a situation explained by the mobilizing effects of organizations), an effect of education was found in the 1993 survey. Also noteworthy is the distribution of participation among the population: rather than being cumulative, different forms of political involvement are relatively widespread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Paul R. (1983).Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, John H., and Nelson, Forrest D. (1984).Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Sage Series in Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Nr. 07-045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney (1963).The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldersheim, Harald, Hansen, Tore, Pettersen, Per Arnt, and Rose, Lawrence (1990).Publikums syn på kommunepolitikk og kommunale tjenester. Bergen: Norsk senter for forskning i ledelse, organisasjon og styring (LOS-senteret). Rapport 90/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin R. (1984).Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin R. (1988).The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Samuel H., and Kaase, Max (eds.) (1979).Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Paul A., and Jennings, M. Kent (1982). Pathways to participation.American Political Science Review 76:94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Bennett, Linda L. M. (1986). Political participation, in Samuel Long (ed.),Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Resnick, David (1990). Implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United States.American Journal of Political Science 34:771–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Richard A. (1978). The puzzle of political participation in America, in Anthony King (ed.),The New American Political System. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald (1974).Political Change in Britain. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, and Rokkan, Stein (1960). Citizen participation in political life: A comparison of data for Norway and the United States.International Social Science Journal 12:69–99. Reprinted in Stein Rokkan,Citizens, Elections, Parties. New York: David McKay Co., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960).The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, Roger W., and Elder, Charles D. (1972).Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob, and Cohen, Patricia (1983).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E., and Niemi, Richard G. (1971). Non-voting among young adults in the United States, in W. J. Crotty, D. M. Freeman, and D. S. Gatlin (eds.),Political Parties and Political Behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1967). The city and the future of democracy.American Political Science Review 61:953–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A., and Tufte, Edward R. (1973).Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fevolden, Trond, and Sørensen, Rune (1987). Norway, in Edward C. Page and Michael J. Goldsmith (eds.),Central and Local Government Relations: A Comparative Analysis of West European Unitary States. London: Sage Publications. Sage Modern Politics Series, vol. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H. (1983).Political Behavior of the American Electorate, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallenstvedt, Abraham, and Moren, Jorolv (1975). Det organiserte samfunn, in Natalie R. Ramsøy and Mariken Vaa (eds.),Det norske samfunn. Oslo: Gyldendahl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høst, Sigurd (1991). The Norwegian newspaper system, in Helge Rønning and Knut Lundby (eds.),Media and Communication: Readings in Methodology. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and van Deth, Jan W. (eds.) (1990).Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies. New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jae-on, Nie, Norman H., and Verba, Sidney (1974). The amount and concentration of political participation.Political Methodology 1:105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, Francesco (1994).Between Autonomy and Integration: The Revision of the Norwegian Local Government Act, 1987–1992. Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of Political Science. Working Paper 06/1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, William (1981).Participation and Democracy in Norway: “The Distant Democracy” Revisited. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Robert E. (1959).Political Life: Why and How People Get Involved in Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Helge O., and Offerdal, Audun (1990).Demokrati uten deltakere. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1980).Applied Regression: An Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Sage Series in Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Nr. 07-022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour M., and Schneider, William (1983).The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor and Government in the Public Mind. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabileau, Albert, Moyser, George, Parry, Geraint, and Quantin, Patrick (1989).Local Politics and Participation in Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984).After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1988).Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Alan (1977).Protest and Political Consciousness. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Sage Library of Social Research, vol. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen, Willy (1977).The Distant Democracy: Social Inequality, Political Resources and Political Influence in Norway. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Lester W. (1965).Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Lester W., and Goel, M. L. (1977).Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? 2nd. ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E. (1980). Disinterest, disaffection and participation in presidential politics.Political Behavior 2:7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, William L. (1986). Local electoral behavior, inThe Conduct of Local Authority Business. London: Committee of Inquiry into the Conduct of Local Authority Business. Research Volume. III: The Local Government Elector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Deborah (1991).Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Barbara J. (1984).Making an Issue of Child Abuse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Kenneth (1976).Second City Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOU 1992: 15.Kommune- og fylkesinndelingen i et Norge i forandring. Oslo: Ministry of Local Government Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Higgins, Michael, Schmaus, Günther, and Stephenson, Geoffrey (1990). Income distribution and redistribution: A microdata analysis for seven countries, in Timothy M. Smeeding, Michael O'Higgins, and Lee Rainwater (eds.),Poverty, Inequality and Income Distribution in Comparative Perspective: The Luxembourg Income Study (LIS). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P., and Sætren, Harald (1980).Aksjoner og demokrati. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Geraint, Moyser, George, and Day, Neil (1992).Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, Elazar J. (1982).Multiple Regression Analysis in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen, Per Arnt (1988). Hjemmesitterne: Hvor-Hvem og Hvorfor.Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift 4:291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen, Per Arnt (1989). Comparing non-voters in the USA and Norway.European Journal of Political Research 17:351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Lawrence E. (1976).Political Participation in Norway. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Lawrence E. (1996). Norway, in Erik Albæk et al. (eds.),Nordic Local Government: Developmental Trends and Reform Activities in the Postwar Period. Helsinki: The Association of Finnish Local Authorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Lawrence E., Hovland, Inger-Anne, and Skeidsvoll, Audun (1994). Lokal tilhørighet, tilfredshet med offentlige tjenester og holdninger til lokale forhold: Noen resultater fra en landsomfattende undersøkelse, med særskilt vekt på kommunestørrelsens betydning. Oslo: Institutt for statsvitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo. Working paper 08/94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Lawrence E., and Pettersen, Per Arnt (1995). Borgerdyder og det lokale selvstyret: Politisk liv og lære blant folk flest, in Tore Hansen and Audun Offerdal (eds.).Borgere, tjenesteytere, beslutningstakere: Festskrift til Francesco Kjellberg. Oslo: Tano forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Lawrence E., and Waldahl, Ragnar (1982). The distribution of political participation in Norway: Alternative perspectives on a problem of democratic theory.Scandinavian Political Studies 5:285–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael J. (1982).Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael J. (1984). The procedural republic and the unencumbered self.Political Theory 12:81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1961).The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, Per, and Svåsand, Lars (1987). Cultural policy, leisure and voluntary associations in Norway.Leisure Studies 6:347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, Per, and Øymyr, Bjarne (1992). Explaining changes in the population of voluntary organizations: Aggregate or individual level data?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 21:147–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L. J. (1970). Theories and values of local government.Political Studies 3:153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M. (1981).A Question of Loyalty. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Togeby, Lise (1993). Grass roots participation in the Nordic countries.European Journal of Political Research 24:159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen, Henry, and Aardal, Bernt O. (1983).Et valg i perspektiv. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå. Sosiale og økonomiske studier, nr. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen, Henry, Aardal, Bernt, and Vogt, Gunnar (1990).Endring og kontinuitet. Stortingsvalget 1989. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå. Sosiale og økonomiske studier, nr. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H. (1972).Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on (1971).The Modes of Democratic Participation: A Cross-National Comparison. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, No. 01-013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on (1978).Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Brady, Henry, and Nie, Norman H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say?American Political Science Review 87:303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickwar, W. Hardy (1970).The Political Theory of Local Government. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. (1980).Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettersen, P.A., Rose, L.E. Participation in local politics in Norway: Some do, some don't; some will, some won't. Polit Behav 18, 51–97 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498660

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498660

Keywords

Navigation