Abstract
Constitutional and institutional reform is occurring at an impressive rate throughout the world. To explain the dynamics of reform the scholarly literature has focused almost exclusively on political elites. Analyses of the role played by public opinion in the constitutional reform process have been largely missing. This study takes an initial first step toward understanding the role played by public opinion through an analysis of public understanding of selected constitutional reform issues in Argentina. The evidence indicates that the Argentine public has a fairly sophisticated understanding of the issues involved in constitutional reform. This finding suggests that current elite-based explanations of constitutional and institutional reforms are incomplete. The article also provides a point of departure for future studies of the complex elite-mass interaction that occurs during reform.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney (1963).The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bawn, Kathleen (1993). The logic of institutional performances: German electoral law as a social choice outcome.American Journal of Political Science 37: 965–989.
Bishop, George F., Oldendick, Robert W., and Tuchfarber, Alfred J. (1980). Pseudoopinions on public affairs.Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 198–209.
Brady, David, and Mo, Jongryn (1992). Electoral systems and institutional choice: A case study of the 1988 Korean elections.Comparative Political Studies 24: 405–429.
Caridi, Eduardo H. (1992). El Federalismo Regional.Contribuciones 9 (October–December): 90–103.
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Planning Committee (1995). The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems: Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee. CSES Secretariat, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Converse, Philip E. (1970). Attitudes and nonattitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In Edward Tufte (ed.),The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, pp. 168–189. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Corach, Carlos (April 6, 1994). No Habrá un Ejecutivo de Dos Cabezas.Clarín, p. 19.
Dahl, Robert A. (1961).Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. (1989).Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Diamond, Larry (1993). Causes and effects. In Larry Diamond (ed.),Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries, pp. 411–435. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Duchacek, Ivo D. (1986).The Territorial Dimension of Politics: Within, Among, and Across Nations. Boulder: Westview.
Durañona y Vedia, Francisco de (1993). Interview (3/01/93, Buenos Aires, Argentina) with Durañona y Vedia, president of the bloc of theUnión del Centro Democrático in the Argentine Chamber, Chamber deputy (1987–95), former federal intervener in the province of Corrientes (1991–92).
Ferreira Rubio, Delia (1993). Interview with Ferreira Rubio (3/05/93, Buenos Aires, Argentina), an expert on Argentine constitutional law.
Ferreira Rubio, Delia, and Goretti, Matteo (1994). Government by Decree in Argentina (1989–1993). Presented at the XVIII International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
Geddes, Barbara (1990). Democratic Institutions as Bargains Among Self-Interested Politicians. Presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
Gil Lavedra, Ricardo (March 29, 1994). Jefe de Gabinete y Control del Ejecutivo.Clarín, p. 15.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (1993).Anuario Estadístico de la República Argentina 1993. Buenos Aires: INDEC.
Johnston, Richard, et al. (1992).Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Kingdon, John W. (1989).Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 3rd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kingdon, John W. (1995).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: Harper Collins.
Lamounier, Bolivar, and de Souza, Amaury (1993). Changing attitudes toward democracy and institutional reform in Brazil. In Larry Diamond (ed.),Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries, pp. 295–326. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Lijphart, Arend (1984).Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend (1992). Democratization and constitutional choices in Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland.Journal of Theoretical Politics 4: 207–223.
Lijphart, Arend (1994). Presidentialism and majoritarian democracy: Theoretical observations. In Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela (eds.),The Failure of Presidential Democracy, pp. 91–105. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lijphart, Arend et al. (1988). A Mediterranean model of democracy? The southern European democracies in comparative perspective.West European Politics 2: 7–25.
Linz, Juan J. (1978). Crisis, breakdown, and reequilibration. In Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan (eds.),The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, pp. 3–86. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1981).Political Man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott (1994). Explaining Choices of Political Institutions: Brazil, 1985–93. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.
Masnatta, Héctor (1989). Los Recursos Financieros en el Sistema Federal. InReforma Constitucional, Jornadas Nacionales del Ministerio del Interior y la Fundación Banco de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, pp. 219–235. Buenos Aires: Municipalidad de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires.
Molinelli, N. Guillermo (1994). Como Funcionaría la Nueva Constitución.La Ley, March 24, pp. 1–3.
La Nación (March 14, 1994), p. 8.
Nino, Carlos Santiago (1992). Que Reforma Constitucional?Propuesta y Control 21: 2307–2335.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (1992).The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pírez, Pedro (1986).Coparticipación Federal y Descentralización del Estado. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.
Pontussi, Ennio Pedro (1993). Interview (4/01/93, Salta, Argentina) with Pontussi, president of the Senate bloc of thePartido Renovador de Salta in the Salta provincial Senate (1989–93), 1994 Constituent Assembly delegate.
La Prensa (June 13, 1992), p. 6.
Romero Feris, José Antonio (1993). Interview (3/15/93, Buenos Aires, Argentina) with Romero Feris, Argentine National Senator (1987–95), governor of the province of Corrientes (1983–87), 1994 Constituent Assembly delegate.
Sartori, Giovanni (1994). Neither presidentialism nor parliamentarism. In Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela (eds.),The Failure of Presidential Democracy, pp. 106–118. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley (1981).Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Academic Press.
Sniderman, Paul M. (1993). The new look in public opinion research. In Ada W. Finifter (ed.),Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, pp. 219–245. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, M.P. Assessing the public's understanding of constitutional reform: Evidence from Argentina. Polit Behav 18, 25–49 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498659
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498659