Abstract
How do citizens respond to dramatic uses of military force? While we know a great deal about the conditions that driveaggregate changes in presidential popularity in response to a president's use of military force, we know surprisingly little about howindividuals respond to such events. What types of individuals operating under what types of conditions are more likely to support such actions? And to what extent does approval of the use of force affect subsequent changes, not only in presidential popularity, but also in more general foreign policy attitudes? We use panel survey data collected before and after the U.S. bombing of Libya in 1986 to investigate the individual-level dynamics of opinion change in response to this dramatic event. Because our study neatly brackets the Libyan air strikes, we are able to examine in some detail the antecedents and consequences of individuals' reactions to a president's use of military force. We find that watching President Reagan's dramatic televised speech had an unmistakable impact in moving respondents to support the bombing. We also find that support for the Libyan air strikes appeared to precipitate greater approval for a range of more “hard-line” military responses toward terrorism, thus creating opportunities for similar-or even broader—presidential initiatives in the future. Finally, because the bombing was the only significant event occurring between the waves of the panel, our quasi-experimental design ties approval of the bombing clearly to an upsurge in presidential approval. Implications for various perspectives on presidential leadership of public opinion in foreign affairs are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Behr, Roy, and Iyengar, Shanto (1993).The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York: Macmillan.
Bartels, Larry M. (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure.American Political Science Review 87:267–285.
Blechman, Barry, and Kaplan, Stephen (1978).Force Without War. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Brace, Paul, and Hinckley, Barbara (1992).Follow the Leader: The Presidents and the Polls. New York: Basic Books.
Brody, Richard A. (1984). International crises: A rallying point for the president?Public Opinion 6: 41–43, 60.
Brody, Richard A. (1991).Assessing the President. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brody, Richard A., and Shapiro, Catherine R. (1989). Policy failure and public support: The Iran-Contra affair and public assessments of President Reagan.Political Behavior 11:353–370.
Erskine, Hazel G. (1963). The polls: Exposure to international information.Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 658–662.
Fiorina, Morris P. (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E. (1992).Social Cognition, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Greene, William (1991).Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan.
Hagle, Timothy M., and Mitchell, Glenn E. II (1992). Goodness-of-fit measures for probit and logit.American Journal of Political Science 36: 762–784.
Hallin, David C. (1986).The “Uncensored War”: The Media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hibbs, Douglas A., Jr., Rivers, Douglas and Vasilatos, Nicholas (1982). The dynamics of political support for American presidents among occupational and partisan groups.American Journal of Political Science 26:312–332.
Hinckley, Ronald H. (1992).People, Polls, and Policymakers. New York: Lexington Books.
Holsti, Ole (1992). Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippman consensus.International Studies Quarterly 36: 439–466.
Hurwitz, Jon (1989). Presidential leadership and public followership. In Michael Margolis and Gary Mausser (eds.),Manipulating Public Opinion. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 222–249.
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model.American Political Science Review 81:1099–1110.
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark (1990). Public images of the Soviet Union: The impact on foreign policy attitudes.Journal of Politics 52: 3–28.
Ippolito, Dennis, Walker, Thomas G., and Kolson, Kenneth L. (1976).Public Opinion and Responsible Democracyn Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jervis, Robert (1976).Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kernell, Samuel (1978). Explaining presidential popularity.American Political Science Review 72:506–522.
Kernell, Samuel (1992).Going Public: New Strategies of presidential Leadership, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Krosnick, Jon A. (1990). Expertise and political psychology.Social Cognition 8: 1–9.
Krosnick, Jon A., and Brannon, Laura A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Miultidimensional effects of political involvement.American Political Science Review 87: 963–978.
Krosnick, Jon A., and Kinder, Donald R. (1990). Altering the foundations of popular support for the president through priming: Reagan and the Iran-Contra Affair.American Political Science Review 84: 497–512.
Kuklinski, James H., Metlay, Daniel S., and Kay, W. D. (1982). Citizen knowledge and choices on the complex issue of nuclear energy.American Journal of Political Science 26: 615–642.
Lian, Bradley, and Oneal, John R. (1993). Presidents, the use of military force, and public opinion.Journal of Conflict Resolution 37:277–300.
Lipset, Seymour M. (1966). The president, the polls and Vietnam.Transaction, 19–24.
MacKuen, Michael B. (1983). Political drama, economic conditions and the dynamics of presidential popularity.American Journal of Political Science 26: 165–192.
Markus, Gregory (1979).Analyzing Panel Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Marra, Robin F., Ostrom, Charles W., Jr., and Simon, Dennis M. (1990). Foreign policy and presidential popularity.Journal of Conflict Resolution 34: 588–623.
Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1993). Source cues and policy approval: The cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda.American Journal of Political Science 37: 186–212.
Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1994). Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues.Political Behavior. forthcoming.
Mueller, John E. (1973).War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.
Norpoth, Helmut (1987). Guns and butter and government popularity in Britain.American Political Science Review 81: 949–959.
Ostrom, Charles W., Jr. and Simon, Dennis (1988). The president's public.American Journal of Political Science 32: 1096–1119.
Ottati, Victor C., and Wyer, Robert S. (1990). The cognitive mediators of political choice: Toward a comprehensive model of political information processing. In: J. A. Ferejohn and J. H. Kuklinski (eds.),Information and the Democratic Process. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (1992).The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Dempsey, Glenn R. (1987). What moves public opinion?American Political Science Review 81: 23–43.
Paletz, David L., and Entman, Robert (1981).Media, Power and Politics. New York: Free Press.
Peffley, Mark, and Hurwitz, Jon (1987). Foreign policy attitudes and political behavior. Report prepared for the National Election Service 1987 Pilot Study.
Peffley, Mark, and Hurwitz, Jon (1992). International events and foreign policy beliefs: Public response to changing Soviet-U.S. relations.American Journal of Political Science 36: 431–461.
Petty, Richard E., and Cacciopo, John T. (1986).Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ragsdale, Lynn (1984). The politics of presidential speechmaking, 1949–1980.American Political Science Review 74: 971–984.
Ragsdale, Lynn (1987). Presidential speechmaking and the public audience: Individual presidents and group attitudes.Journal of Politics 49: 704–727.
Rosen, Corey M. (1973). A test of presidential leadership of public opinion: The splitballot technique.Polity VI: 282–290.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Page, Benjamin I. (1988). Foreign policy and the rational public.Journal of Conflict Resolution 32: 211–247.
Sigelman, Lee, and Sigelman, Carol (1981). Presidential leadership of public opinion: From “opinion leader” to “kiss of death”?Experimental Study of Politics 7: 1022.
Sigelman, Lee, and Sigelman, Carol (1986). Shattered expectations: Public responses to “out-of-character” presidential actions.Political Behavior 8: 262–286.
Simon, Dennis, and Ostrom, Charles W., Jr. (1989). The impact of televised speeches and foreign travel on presidential approval.Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 58–82.
Stimson, James A. (1976). Public support for American presidents: A cyclical model.Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 1–21.
Zeller, John (1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response.Social Cognition 8: 125–153.
Zaller, John (1993). Information, values and opinion.American Political Science Review 85: 1215–1238.
Zaller, John (1992).The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zelikow, Philip D. (1987). The United States and the use of military force. In George K. Observe et al. (eds.),Democracy, Strategy and Vietnam. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peffley, M., Langley, R.E. & Goidel, R.K. Public responses to the presidential use of military force: A panel analysis. Polit Behav 17, 307–337 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498599
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498599