Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes, behaviors, and the influence of the family: A reexamination of the role of family structure

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political socialization researchers have long declared the importance of the family to the socialization of young people. But political science has not kept pace with the dramatic changes in “family” over the last 25 years. Where, in the past, family was generally a two-parent family, today more than 25 percent of the families with children under 18 are single-parent families. This research seeks to reexamine the traditional assumptions about how family structure influences socialization by testing the hypothesis that young adults raised in single-parent families experience different patterns of political socialization than those raised in two-parent families. However, the data provide no support for this hypothesis. There is no relationship between family structure and political efficacy, political knowledge, or political participation, and only a weak one between structure and political trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, Paul, and Jennings, M. Kent (1982). Pathways to participation.American Political Science Review 76: 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census (1990a). Household and family characteristics.Current Population Reports, Series P-20, U.S. Department of Commerce.

  • Bureau of the Census (1990b). Marital status and living arrangements.Current Population Reports, Series P-20, U.S. Department of Commerce.

  • Bureau of the Census (1991).Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. Margaret (1991).Political Participation in the United States. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Stephen, Niemi, Richard, and Silver, Glenn (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items.Political Behavior 12: 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, James (1965). The family's role in political socialization.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 361: 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, Richard, and Prewitt, Kenneth (1969).Political Socialization. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David, and Dennis, Jack (1969).Children in the Political System. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Edythe (1983). Issues concerning parental harmony and children's psychosocial adjustment.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 53: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, Fred (1965).Children and Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Robert, and Torney, Judith (1967).The Development of Political Attitudes in Young Adults. Chicago: Aldine Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, Leone, and Terkildsen, Nayda (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates.American Journal of Political Science 37: 119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, Herbert (1959).Political Socialization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaros, Dean (1973).Socialization to Politics. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaros, Dean, Hirsch, Herbert, and Fleron, Frederic (1968). The malevolent leader: Political socialization in an American sub-culture.American Political Science Review 62: 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Langton, Kenneth (1969). Mothers vs. fathers: The formation of political orientations among young Americans.Journal of Politics 31: 329–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard (1968) The transmission of political values from parent to child.American Political Science Review 62: 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard (1974).The Political Character of Adolescents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinard, Milling, and Reinherz, Helen (1986). Effects of marital disruption on children's school aptitude and achievement.Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Robert (1959).Political Life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Kenneth (1969).Political Socialization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, Herbert, and Dahlgren, Harold (1959). Primary group influence on party loyalty.American Political Science Review 53: 757–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, Richard, Ross, Danforth, and Alexander, Joseph (1978). The similarity of political values of parents and college age youths.Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Arthur, and Glick, Paul (1986). One parent families: A social and economic profile.Family Relations 35: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, Sue Tolleson (1988). Gender differences and the political orientations of southern college students.Women and Politics 8: 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, James, and Lau, Richard (1989). Political sophistication and political deviance: A matter of context.Political Psychology 10: 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, Roberta, and Hoskins, Marilyn (1981).The Political Involvement of Adolescents. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolan, K. Attitudes, behaviors, and the influence of the family: A reexamination of the role of family structure. Polit Behav 17, 251–264 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498596

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498596

Keywords

Navigation