Skip to main content
Log in

Partisan change in the Mountain West

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 1980s partisanship in the Mountain West shifted dramatically toward the Republican Party. This change was the result of issue-based conversion rather than group mobilization. Specifically, we trace this surge to Reagan's transformation of the issues connected with the Republican Party. Previous discussions of issue-based conversion have assumed that this force influences all voters equally. One of the issues behind the Mountain West's changed partisanship follows this pattern: Individualism (or limiting government influence on the individual) was behind both the Mountain West surge (and decline) in Republicanism and the nationwide growth in that party. But the second issue did not follow this pattern: Abortion influenced the Mountain West selectively. We conclude that partisan change can be the result of uniform influence of issue change, but that it can also be the result of issue changes that influence different groups of voters differentially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achen, Christopher H. (1989). Prospective voting and the theory of party identification. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, 30 August–3 September.

  • Allsop, Dee, and Herbert F. Weisberg (1988). Measuring change in party identification in an election campaign.American Journal of Political Science 32:996–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Kristi (1979).The Creation of a Democratic Majority 1928–1936. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Paul Allen (1974). A socialization theory of realignment. In Richard G. Niemi, et al. (eds.),The Politics of Future Citizens, pp. 199–219. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Paul Allen (1982). Realignment begins? The Republican surge in Florida.American Politics Quarterly 10:421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Paul Allen (1984). The electoral cycle and patterns of American politics. In Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg (eds.),Controversies in Voting Behavior, pp. 519–544. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, Robert C. (1987). Policy change and regional realignment. In Peter F. Galderisi, Michael S. Lyons, Randy T. Simmons, and John G. Francis (eds.),The Politics of Realignment: Party Change in the Mountain West, pp. 129–147. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Thad (1988).Migration and Politics: The Impact of Population Mobility on American Voting Behavior. Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnhan, Walter Dean (1985). The 1984 election and the future of American politics. In Ellis Sandoz and Cecil V. Crabb, Jr. (eds.),Election 84: Landslide Without a Mandate? New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1989).Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., Steven H. Renten, and James A. Stimson (1984). Events and alignments: The party image link. In Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg (eds.),Controversies in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clubb, Jerome, William H. Flanigan, and Nancy H. Zingale (1980).Partisan Realignment: Voters, Parties, and Government in American History. Beverly Hills: Sage Pubications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deseret News (1990).1991–1992 Church Almanac. Salt Lake City: Deseret News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, Douglas, and Duane A. Meeter (1974). Alternative Markov models for describing change in party identification.American Journal of Political Science 18:487–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Laurily K. (1984-85). 1984—A realigning election?Election Politics 2:2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S., John P. McIver, and Gerald C. Wright, Jr. (1987). State political culture and public opinion.American Political Science Review 81:797–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S., and Kent L. Tedin (1981). The 1928–1936 partisan realignment: The case for the conversion hypothesis.American Political Science Review 75:951–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Thomas, and Joel Rogers (1986).Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frendreis, John P. (1989). Migration as a source of changing party strength.Social Science Quarterly 70:211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galderisi, Peter F., Michael S. Lyonns, Randy T. Simmons, and John G. Francis, eds. (1987).The Politics of Readignment: Party Change in the Mountain West. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamm Gerald H. (1989).The Making of New Deal Democrats: Voting Behavior and Realignment in Boston, 1920–1940. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James L. (1987). The role of party organizations in the Mountain West: 1960–1980. In Peter F. Galderisi, Michael S. Lyons, Randy T. Simmos, and John G. Francis (eds.),The Politics of Realignment: Party Change in the Mountain West, pp. 197–219. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havard, William C. (1986). Southern politics: A prelude to presidential politics in 1984. In Robert P. Steed, Laurence W. Moreland, and Tod A. Baker (eds.),The 1984 Presidential Election in the South: Patterns of Southern Party Politics, pp. 3–17. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnson, Paul S., and Kelly D. Patterson (1995). Coalition building in the House: Toward a more programmatic Democratic Party.Polity, forthcoming.

  • Jackson, John E. (1975). Issues, party choices, and presidential votes.American Journal of Political Science 19:161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawato, Sadafumi (1987). Nationalizatio and partisan realignment in congressional elections.American Political Science Review 81:1235–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1955). A theory of critical elections.Journal of Politics, 17:3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system.Journal of Politics, 21:198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleppner, Paul (1983). Voters and parties in the western states, 1876–1900.Western Historical Quarterly 14:49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Everett Carll (1985). On mandates, realignments, and the 1984 presidential election.Political Science Quarterly 100:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Everett Carll (1989). The 1988 elections: Continuation of the post-New Deal system.Political Science Quarterly 104:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Everett Carll, Jr., with Charles D. Hadley. (1978).Transformations of the American Party System: Political Coaditions from the New Deal to the 1970s. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, David G., and Richard Fleisher (1987) Puzzles and confusions: Political realignment in the 1980s.Political Science Quarterly 102:79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H. (1987). Public opinion and regional political realignment. In Peter F. Galderisi, Michael S. Lyons, Randy T. Simmons, and John G. Francis (eds.),The Politics of Realignment: Party Change in the Mountain West, pp. 79–100. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E. (1990). The electorate's view of the parties. In L. Sandy Maisel (ed.),The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nexon, David H. (1980). Methodological issues in the study of realignment. In Bruce A. Campbell and Richard J. Trilling (eds.),Realignment in American Politics: Toward a Theory, pp. 52–65. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norpoth, Helmut (1987). Under way and here to stay: Party realignment in the 1980s?Public Opinion Quarterly t1:376–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norpoth, Helmut, and Michael R. Kagay (1989). Another eight years of Republican rule and still no partisan realignment? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, 31 August–3 September.

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Calvin C. Jones (1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote.American Political Science Review 73: 1071–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, John R. (1981).Party Coalitions: Realignments and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, John R. (1987). Realignment: New party coalitions and the nationalization of the South.Journal of Politics 49: 347–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, John R. (1989). An expected party vote: New data for an old concept.American Journal of Political Science 33: 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammon, Richard, and Ben Wattenberg (1970).The Real Majority. New York: Coward McCann and Geoghegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, Byron E., ed. (1991).The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Eric R. A. N., and Peverill Squire (1987). State and national politics in the Mountain West. In Peter F. Galderisi, Michael S. Lyons, Randy T. Simmons, and John G. Francis (eds.),The Politics of Realignment: Party Change in the Mountain West. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom W. (1990). Classifying Protestant denominations.Review of Religious Research 31: 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom W., and James Allan Davis (1992).General Social Surveys, 1972–1991. [machine-readable data file]. Principal Investigator, James A. Davis; Director and Co-Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith. NORC ed. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, producer, Storrs, CT: Roper Public Opinion Research Center, University of Connecticut, distributor. 1 data file (27,782 logical records) and 1 codebook (989p).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Walter J. (1987). Regional variation in partisan change: Realignment in the Mountain West. In Peter F. Galderisi, Michael S. Lyons, Randy T. Simmons, and John G. Francis (eds.),The Politics of Realignment: Party Change in the Mountain West, pp. 55–78. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundquist, James L. (1983).Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, revised edition. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P., and Arthur H. Miller (1981). Decay in regional party coalitions: 1952–1980. In Seymour Martin Lipset (ed.),Party Coalitions in the 1980s. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchant-Shapiro, T., Patterson, K.D. Partisan change in the Mountain West. Polit Behav 17, 359–378 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498515

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498515

Keywords

Navigation