Abstract
Recent evidence for the top mass in the region of 160 GeV for the first time provides an opportunity to use the full power of relativistic quantum field theoretical methods, available also for weakly bound systems. Because of the large decay width Γ of the top quark individual energy-levels in “toponium” will be unobservable. However, the potential for the\(t\bar t\) system, based on a systematic expansion in powers of the strong coupling constant α s can be rigorously derived from QCD and plays a central role in the threshold region. It is essential that the neglect of nonperturbative (confining) effects is fully justified here for the first time to a large accuracy, also justbecause of the large Γ. The different contributions to that potential are computed from real level corrections near the bound state poles of the\(t\bar t\)-system which for Γ≠0 move into the unphysical sheet of the complex energy plane. Thus, in order to obtain the different contributions to that potential we may use the level corrections at that (complex) pole. Within the relevant level shifts we especially emphasize the corrections of orderO(α 4 s m t ) and numerically comparable ones to that order also from electroweak interactions which may become important as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.E. Salpeter, H.A. Bethe: Phys. Rev. 84 (1951) 1232; M. Gell-Mann, F.E. Low: Phys. Rev. 84 (1951) 350
G. Lepage: Phys. Rev. A16 (1977) 863; W Kummer: Nucl. Phys. B179 (1981) 365
F.L. Feinberg: Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 2659
R. Barbieri, E. Remiddi: Nucl. Phys. B141 (1978) 413; W.E. Caswell, G.P. Lepage: Phys. Rev. A 18 (1978) 810.
G.T. Bodwin, D.R. Yennie and M. Gregorio: Rev. Mod. Phys. 57 (1985) 723; W.E Caswell, G.P. Lepage: Phys. Lett. B167 (1986) 437
S. Love: Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 113 (1978) 153
For recent reviews see: J.H. Kühn, P.W. Zerwas: Phys. Rep. 167 (1988) 321; W. Lucha, F.F. Schöberl, D. Gromes, Phys. Rep. 200 (1991) 127
P.J. Franzini: Phys. Lett. B296 (1992) 199, 195
T. Appelquist, M. Dine, I.J. Muzinich: Phys. Lett. B69 (1977) 231; W. Fischler, Nucl. Phys. B129 (1977) 157; I.J. Muzinich and F.E. Paige, Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 1151
S.N. Gupta and F. Redford: Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 2309, 25 (1982) 3430; S.N. Gupta, F. Redford, W.W. Repko: Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 3305 J. Pantaleone, S.-H. H. Tye, Y.J. Ng: Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 777; F. Halzen et al.: Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 3013.
“Quarkonia” ed. W. Buchmüller, Current Physics-Sources and Comments, Vol. 9, North Holland, 1992
Actually a few papers exist which are careful to argue for a closer relation with reliable QCD perturbation theory; see e.g. W. Buchmüller, Y.J. Ng and S.-H.H. Tye Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 3003 S. Titard and J. Ynduráin “Rigorous QCD evaluation of spectrum and ground state properties of heavy\(q\bar q\) Systems”, UM-TH 93-25 and FTUAM 94-6.
W. Kummer, G. Wirthumer: Nucl. Phys. B185 (1981) 41
R. Barbieri, G. Curci, E. d'Emilio, E. Remiddi: Nucl. Phys. B154 (1979) 535; R. Barbieri, M. Caffo, R. Gatto, E. Remiddi: Phys. Lett. B95 (1980) 93; K. Hagiwara, C.B. Kim, T. Yoshino: Nucl. Phys. B177 (1981) 461
M. Jeżabek: “Top quark physics”, Karlsruhe prep. TTP94-09
H. Leutwyler: Phys. Lett. B98 (1981) 447
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov: Nucl. Phys. B147 (1978) 385, 448
W. Kummer and G. Wirthumer: Phys. Lett. B150 (1985), 392; W. Kummer, G. Wirthumer and H. Leutwyler: Lett. al Nuovo Cim. 42 (1985), 187
V.S. Fadin and O.I. Yakolev: [Yad. Fiz. 53 (1991) 1111], Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53 (1991) 688
CDF Collaboration (F. Abe, et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 225; Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 2966
ALEPH,DELPHI,L3, OPAL, Phys. Lett. B276 (1992) 247; J. Ellis, G.L. Fogli and E.Lisi, “The top quark and Higgs boson masses in the standard model and the MSSM” CERN-TH-7261-94 (May 1994)
J.H. Kühn, ‘The toponium scenario’ Karlsruhe preprint TTP92-40; M. Jeżabek, J.H. Kühn, ‘The top width’, Karlsruhe preprint TTP 93-4
V.S. Fadin, V.A. Khoze: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 48 (1988) 309
M.J. Strassler and M.E. Peskin: Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 1500
Y. Sumino, K. Fujii, H. Hagiwara, H. Murayama, C.-K. Ng: Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 56
M. Veltman: Physica 29 (1963) 186
A. Duncan: Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 2866
J. Schwinger: Phys. Rev. 127, (1962) 324; N.H. Christ, T.D. Lee: Phys. Rev. 22 (1980) 939
W. Mödritsch, W. Kummer: Nucl. Phys. B430 (1994) 3
G. Tiktopoulos: Journ. Math. Phys. 6 (1965) 573; W. Kummer: Nucl. Phys. B179 (1981) 365
S. Mandelstam: Proc. Roy. Soc. A233 (1955) 248; D. Lurié, A.J. Macfarlane, Y. Takahashi: Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B 1091
G. Wirthumer, PhD thesis, TU-Wien 1984
W. Buchmüller, E. Remiddi: Nucl. Phys. B162 (1980) 250
J. Malenfant: Phys. Rev. D35 (1987) 1525
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifschitz: ‘Lehrbuch der Theoretischen Physik Bd.IV, Quantenelektrodynamik’, Akademie Verlag Berlin 1986
K. Hagiwara, S. Jacobs, M.G. Olsson, K.J. Miller: Phys. Lett. 130B (1983) 209, K. Hagiwara, A.D. Martin, A.W. Peacock: Z. Phys. C33 (1986) 135
I.S. Gradstein und I.M. Ryshik: ‘Summen, Produkt und Integraltafeln’, Harri Deutsch. Thun 1981
T. Fulton, P. Martin: Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 811
T. Muta: ‘Foundations of quantum chromodynamics’, World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol.5 (1986)
D.R.T. Jones: Nucl. Phys. B75 (1974) 531; W.E. Caswell: Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 244
W. Mödritsch, A. Vairo: in preparation
P. Jain et al., Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 4029 and references therein
I.M. Gel'fand, G.E. Shilov: Generalized functions' Vol. 1, Academic Press Inc., New York 1964
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work is supported in part by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) in project P10063-PHY within the framework of the EEC-Program “Human Capital and Mobility”, Network “Physics at High Energy Colliders”, contract CHRX-CT93-0357 (DG 12 COMA)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kummer, W., Mödritsch, W. Rigorous QCD-potential for the\(t\bar t\)-system at threshold. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 66, 225–239 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01496596
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01496596