Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of the portable regional CBF monitor and the portable mean hemispheral CBF monitor: Advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

CBF determination can provide additional valuable information which can be used in clinical practice to enhance our capabilities in patient evaluation. The initial techniques requiring intraarterial injections have been largely replaced by the noninvasive inhalation and intravenous methods. The recent refinement of microcomputers and the development of portable CBF monitors have made CBF determination a nontraumatic, dependable and easily repeatable examination at the patient's bedside. In this communication we compare a portable region CBF monitor and a portable mean hemispheral CBF monitor; we study their advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. Emphasis is placed on the practical characteristics and the information provided by each monitor and its contribution to patient evaluation. Illustrative cases are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferguson, G. G., Harper, A. M., Fitch, W.,et al., Cerebral blood flow measurements after spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Eur. Neurol.8 (1972), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grubb, R. L., Raichle, M. E., Eichling, J. O.,et al., Effects of subarachnoid haemorrhage on crebral blood volume, blood flow and oxygen utilisation in humans. J. Neurosurg.46 (1977), 446–453.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heilbrun, M. P., Olesen, J., Lassen, N. A., Regional cerebral blood flow studies in subarachnoid haemorrhage. J. Neurosurg.37 (1972), 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kety, S. S., Schmidt, C. F., The determination of cerebral blood flow in man by the use of nitrous oxide in low concentrations. Lancet2 (1961), 806–807.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Obrist, W., Thompson, H., Jr., Wang, H. H., Regional cerebral blood flow estimated by133Xenon inhalation. Stroke6 (1975), 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Risberg, J., Ali, Z., Wilson, E.,et al., Regional cerebral blood flow by133Xenon inhalation. Stroke6 (1975), 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Risberg, J., Regional cerebral blood flow measurements by 133-Xenon inhalation: Methodology and applications in neuropsychology and psychiatry. Brain and Language9 (1980), 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenstein, J., Suzuki, M., Symon, L., Clinical use of a portable bedside cerebral blood flow machine in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurosurgery15 (1984), 519–525.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Symon, L., Ackerman, R., Bull, J.,et al., The use of the Xenon clearance method in subarachnoid haemorrhage. Eur. Neurol.8 (1972), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas, D. J., Zilkha, E., Redmond, S.,et al., An intravenous133Xenon clearance technique for measuring cerebral blood flow. J. Neurol. Sci.40 (1979), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jabre, A., Symon, L. & Redmond, S. A comparative study of the portable regional CBF monitor and the portable mean hemispheral CBF monitor: Advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. Acta neurochir 77, 142–145 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476217

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476217

Keywords

Navigation