Skip to main content

A framework to assess regional environmental impacts of dedicated energy crop production

Environmental Management volume 20, pages 475–485 (1996)Cite this article

Abstract

Numerous studies have evaluated air quality and greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of biomass energy systems, but the potential environmental impacts associated with large-scale changes in land-use patterns needed to produce energy crops have not been quantified. This paper presents a framework to assess the potential soil, water, and biodiversity impacts that may result from the large-scale production of dedicated energy crops. The framework incorporates producer economic decision models with environmental models to assess changes in land use patterns and to quantify the consequent environmental impacts. Economic and policy issues that will affect decisions to produce energy crops are discussed. The framework is used to evaluate erosion and chemical runoff in two Tennessee regions. The analysis shows that production of dedicated energy crops in place of conventional crops will significantly reduce erosion and chemical runoff.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Literature Cited

  • Alexander, R. R., B. C. English, M. G. Bhat, and R. L. Graham. 1993. Evaluating the economics of biomass energy in the Watts Bar region. Pages 272–277in Proceedings of the first biomass conference of the Americas: Energy, environment, agriculture, and industry, 30 Aug–2 Sept 1993. Burlington, Vermont. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. NREL/CP-200-5768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. H., J. Beyea, and K. H. Keeler. 1991. Potential impacts of biomass production in the United States on biological diversity.Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 16:401–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, M., and R. Graham. 1995. The potential supply and cost of biomass from energy crops in the Tennessee Valley Authority region.Biomass and Bioenergy (in press).

  • Engel, B. A., R. Srinivasan, J. Arnold, C. D. Rewerts, and S. J. Brown. 1993. Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution modeling using models integrated with geographic information systems (GIS).Water Science and Technology 28:685–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, B. C., K. D. Dillivan, M. A. Ojo, R. R. Alexander, and R. L. Graham. 1993. An evaluation of the regional supply of biomass at three midwestern sites. Pages 106–111in Proceedings of the first biomass conference of the Americas: Energy, environment, agriculture, and industry, 30 Aug–2 Sept 1993. Burlington, Vermont. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. NREL/CP-200-5768.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, B. C., K. D. Dillivan, M. A. Ojo, R. R. Alexander, and R. L. Graham. 1995. Regional biomass supply: Three case studies in the midwest, US Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 150 pp. ORNL/Sub/92-SK378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhart, D. L., H. B. Johnson, H. S. Mayeux, and H. W. Polley. 1994. CRP increases soil organic carbon.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 49:488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. L., and M. Downing. 1993. Renewable biomass energy: Understanding regional scale environmental impacts. Pages 1566–1581in Proceedings of the first biomass conference of the Americas: Energy, environment, agriculture, and industry, 30 Aug–2 Sept 1993. Burlington, Vermont. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, NREL/CP-200-5768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. L., L. L. Wright, and A. F. Turhollow, 1992. The potential for short-rotation woody crops to reduce US CO2 emissions.Climatic Change 22:223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. L., W. Liu, M. Downing, C. Noon, M. Daly, and A. Moore. 1995. The effect of location and facility demand on the marginal cost of delivered wood chips from energy crops: A case study of the state of Tennessee. Pages 1324–1333in Proceedings of the second biomass conference of the Americas: Energy, environment, agriculture, and industry, 21–24 Aug 1995. Portland Oregon. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. NREL/CP-200-8098.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rovere, E. L., and P. Audinet. 1993. Environmental benefits of the Brazilian ethanol program. Pages 1533–1546in Proceedings of the first biomass conference of the Americas: Energy, environment, agriculture, and industry, 30 Aug–2 Sept 1993, Burlington, Vermont. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. NREL/CP-200-5768.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, J. D. 1993. Three biomass power plants in New England, first five years of challenges. Pages 1754–1769in Proceedings of the first biomass conference of the Americas: Energy, environment, agriculture, and industry, 30 Aug–2 Sept 1993, Burlington, Vermont, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. NREL/CP-200-5768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., R. A. Merriam, V. D. Phillips, and D. Singh. 1993. Estimating short-rotation Eucalyptus saligna production in Hawaii: An integrated yield and economic model.Bioresource Technology 45:167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., V. D. Phillips, and D. Singh. 1992. A spatial model for the economic evaluation of biomass production systems.Biomass and Bioenergy 3:345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okken, P. A., and J. Van Doorn. 1993. The feasibility of energy crops to reduce CO2 emissions, focused on automotive fuels in the Netherlands.Biomass and Bioenergy 5:121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, T. 1994. A national survey of CRP-contract holders. Pages 60–63in Proceedings of Soil and Water Conservation Society conference when conservation reserve program contracts expire: The policy options, 10–11 February 1994. Arlington, Virginia.

  • OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1993. Potential environmental impacts of biomass energy crop production—background paper. US Congress, Washington, DC, 84 pp. OTA-BP-E-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1984. 1982 national resources inventory, data tape. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, M. 1995. Analysis of surface water quality impacts of biomass plantation establishment in the Midwest. Fourth quarter report to the biofuels feedstock development program. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 125 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladden, S. E., and D. I. Bransby. 1995. Responses of Alabama farmers to a survey on growing switchgrass for energy. Pages 1309–1313in Proceedings of the second biomass conference of the Americas: Energy, environment, agriculture and industry, 21–24 Aug 1995. Portland, Oregon. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. NREL/CP-200-8098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, K. S., C. J. Riley, and K. K. Humphreys. 1993. Fuel cycle evaluations of biomass-ethanol and reformulated gasoline. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, 129 pp. NREL/TP-463-4950.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1993. National agricultural statistics: County crop estimates, Data diskettes. Washington, DC.

  • Williams, J. R., C. A. Jones, J. R. Kinery, and D. A. Spanel. 1989. The EPIC crop growth model.Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32:497–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. L. 1994. Editorial: Dedicated feedstock supply systems.Biomass and Bioenergy 6:149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. L., J. H. Cushman, A. R. Ehrenshaft, S. B. McLaughlin, S. A. Martin, W. A. McNabb, J. W. Ranney, G. A. Tuskan, and A. F. Turhollow. 1993. Biofuels feedstock development program annual progress report for 1992. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 122 pp. ORNL-6781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. A., C. A. Onstad, D. D. Bosch, and W. P. Anderson. 1989. AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44:168–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Biofuels Feedstock Development Program Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, 37831-6335, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA

    Robin L. Graham, Mark Downing & Marie E. Walsh

Authors
  1. Robin L. Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Downing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marie E. Walsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, R.L., Downing, M. & Walsh, M.E. A framework to assess regional environmental impacts of dedicated energy crop production. Environmental Management 20, 475–485 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01474650

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01474650

Key words

  • Energy crops
  • Biomass
  • Environmental impacts
  • Assessment
  • Biomass model