Skip to main content
Log in

Modeled soft X-ray solar irradiances

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solar soft X-rays have historically been inaccurately modeled in both relative variations and absolute magnitudes by empirical solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) irradiance models. This is a result of the use of a limited number of rocket data sets which were primarily associated with the calibration of the AE-E satellite EUV data set. In this work, the EUV91 solar EUV irradiance model has been upgraded to improve the accuracy of the 3.0 to 5.0 nm relative irradiance variations. The absolute magnitude estimate of the flux in this wavelength range has also been revised upwards. The upgrade was accomplished by first digitizing the SOLRAD 11 satellite 4.4 to 6.0 nm measured energy flux data set, then extracting and extrapolating a derived 3.0 to 5.0 nm photon flux from these data, and finally by performing a correlation between these derived data and the daily and 81-day mean 10.7 cm radio flux emission using a multiple linear regression technique. A correlation coefficient of greater than 0.9 was obtained between the dependent and independent data sets. The derived and modeled 3.0 to 5.0 nm flux varies by more than an order of magnitude over a solar cycle, ranging from a flux below 1×108 to a flux greater than 1×109 photons cm−2 s−1. Solar rotational (27-day) variations in the flux magnitude are a factor of 2. The derived and modeled irradiance absolute values are an order of magnitude greater than previous values from rocket data sets related to the calibration of the AE-E satellite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, C. A., Tobiska, W. K., Siskind, D. E., and Cleary, D. D.: 1988,Geophys. Res. Letters 15, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinteregger, H. E., Fukui, K., and Gilson, B. R.: 1981,Geophys. Res. Letters 8, 1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, S. W., and Kreplin, R. W.: 1991,Solar Phys. 133, 371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreplin, R. W.: 1970,Ann. Geophys. 26, 567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreplin, R. W., Dere, K. P., Horan, D. M., and Meekins, J. F.: 1977, in O. R. White (ed.),The Solar Output and Its Variation, Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreplin, R. W. and Horan, D. M.: 1992, in R. F. Donnelly (ed.), ‘Proceedings of the workshop on the solar electromagnetic radiation study for solar cycle 22,’ p. 405.

  • Link, R., Gladstone, G. R., Chakrabarti, S., and McConnell, J. C.: 1988,J. Geophys. Res. 93, 14,631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, H. S., and Judge, D. L.: 1986,J. Geophys. Res. 91, 7089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. G., and Torr, D. G.: 1984,J. Geophys. Res. 89, 5625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskind, D. E., Barth, C. A., and Cleary, D. D.: 1990,J. Geophys. Res. 95, 4311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobiska, W. K.: 1991,J. Atmos. Terr. Phys.,53, 1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winningham, J. D., Decker, D. T., Kozyra, J. U., Jasperse, J. R., and Nagy, A. F.: 1989,J. Geophys. Res. 94, 15,335.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kent Toriska, W. Modeled soft X-ray solar irradiances. Sol Phys 152, 207–215 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01473206

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01473206

Keywords

Navigation