Abstract
Arthroscopy of the knee is a commonly performed procedure with a low reported complication rate. We have experienced two cases during which no. 15 scalpel blades disengaged from the handle and remained within the joint. Although both the blades were successfully retrieved arthroscopically without injury to the knee, the procedures were prolonged, and there remained a potential risk of causing damage. We have subsequently altered our practice and now routinely use a no. 11 blade, with which we have had no complications. We discuss the importance of correct blade selection and surgical technique in avoiding this complication and present two illustrative case histories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bamford DJ, Paul AS, Noble J, Davies DRA (1993) Avoidable Complications of Arthroscopic Surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 38:92–95
Carlsen A (1986) A broken telescope: a complication of arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2:181–183
Collins JJ (1989) Knee joint arthroscopy-early complications. Arthroscopy 150:702–706
Peek RD, Haynes DW (1984) Compartment syndrome as a complication of arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 12:464–468
Small NC (1988) Complications in arthroscopic surgery performed by experienced arthroscopists. Arthroscopy 4:215–221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sochart, D.H., Paul, A.S. & Davies, D.A. Arthroscopic portals: The importance of blade selection. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 3, 209–210 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01466618
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01466618