International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 108–114 | Cite as

Lag responses in mood reports to changes in the weather matrix

  • M. A. Persinger


Correlations were calculated between daily self-evaluated mood reports (4 reports/day) of 10 student subjects and 10 meteorological-geophysical variables over a 90-day period. The variables included mean and/or change measures of temperature, barometric pressure, relative humidity, sunshine hours, wind speeds and global geomagnetic activity. Multiple regression analyses indicated that the weather matrix used could account for not more than 35% of the mood variance on the day of the evaluation. Lag correlations over the previous week clearly indicated a greater number of significant correlations between mood reports and weather of the previous two days. The mean correlation coefficient was 0.27. In general, "lower moods" were associated with fewer sunshine hours, higher relative humidity, and smaller humidity variations than "higher moods". It was concluded that mood reports can show weak responsivity to antecedent weather fluctuations.


Relative Humidity Wind Speed Multiple Regression Analysis Geomagnetic Activity Change Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BEYNON, W.J.G. and WINSTANLEY, E.H. (1969): Geomagnetic disturbance and the troposphere. Nature (Lond.), 222: 1262–1263.Google Scholar
  2. COOVER, G.D., GOLDMAN, L. and LEVINE, S. (1971): Plasma corticosterone increases produced by extinction of operant behavior in rats. Physiol. Behav., 6: 261–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. DORLAND, J. and BRINKER, N. (1973): Fluctuations in human mood (a preliminary study). J. interdiscipl. Cycle Res., 4: 25–29.Google Scholar
  4. DÜLL, T. and DÜLL, B. (1935): Zusammenhänge zwischen Störungen des Erdmagnetismus und Häufungen von Todesfällen. Dtsch. med. Wschr., 61: 95.Google Scholar
  5. FAUST, V. (1972): About weather sensitivity of healthy and psychic sick people. Unpublished paper, University Psychiatric Clinic, Basle, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  6. FRIEDMAN, H., BECKER, R.O., and BACHMAN, C.H. (1965): Psychiatric ward behaviour and geophysical parameters. Nature (Lond.), 205: 1050–1052.Google Scholar
  7. LIDWELL, O.M., MORGAN, R.W. and WILLIAMS, R.E.O. (1965): The epidemiology of the common cold. IV. The effect of weather. J. Hyg. (Lond.), 63: 427–439.Google Scholar
  8. PERSINGER, M.A., OSSENKOPP, K.P., KAMAYA, V. and PEAR, J.J. (1974): Physiological changes associated with changing fixed ratio schedules in rats. Psych. Rep., 35: 847–850.Google Scholar
  9. POKORNY, A.D. and MEFFERD, R.B. (1966): Geomagnetic fluctuations and disturbed behavior. J. nerv. men. Dis., 143: 140–151.Google Scholar
  10. WILCOX, J.M., SCHERRER, P.H., SVALGAARD, L., ROBERTS, W.O. and OLSON, R.H. (1973): Solar magnetic sector structure: relation to circulation of the earth's atmosphere. Science, 180: 185–186.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swets & Zeitlinger B.V. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Persinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Psychophysiology Laboratory, Department of PsychologyLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada

Personalised recommendations