Skip to main content
Log in

Methods in quantitative image analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Histochemistry and Cell Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main steps of image analysis are image capturing, image storage (compression), correcting imaging defects (e.g. non-uniform illumination, electronic noise, glare effect), image enhancement, segmentation of objects in the image and image measurements. Digitisation is made by a camera. The most modern types include a frame-grabber, converting the analog-to-digital signal into digital (numerical) information. The numerical information consists of the grey values describing the brightness of every point within the image, named a pixel. The information is stored in bits. Eight bits are summarised in one byte. Therefore, grey values can have a value between 0 and 256 (28). The human eye seems to be quite content with a display of 5-bit images (corresponding to 64 different grey values). In a digitised image, the pixel grey values can vary within regions that are uniform in the original scene: the image is noisy. The noise is mainly manifested in the background of the image. For an optimal discrimination between different objects or features in an image, uniformity of illumination in the whole image is required. These defects can be minimised by shading correction [subtraction of a background (white) image from the original image, pixel per pixel, or division of the original image by the background image]. The brightness of an image represented by its grey values can be analysed for every single pixel or for a group of pixels. The most frequently used pixelbased image descriptors are optical density, integrated optical density, the histogram of the grey values, mean grey value and entropy. The distribution of the grey values existing within an image is one of the most important characteristics of the image. However, the histogram gives no information about the texture of the image. The simplest way to improve the contrast of an image is to expand the brightness scale by spreading the histogram out to the full available range. Rules for transforming the grey value histogram of an existing image (input image) into a new grey value histogram (output image) are most quickly handled by a look-up table (LUT). The histogram of an image can be influenced by gain, offset and gamma of the camera. Gain defines the voltage range, offset defines the reference voltage and gamma the slope of the regression line between the light intensity and the voltage of the camera. A very important descriptor of neighbourhood relations in an image is the co-occurrence matrix. The distance between the pixels (original pixel and its neighbouring pixel) can influence the various parameters calculated from the co-occurrence matrix. The main goals of image enhancement are climination of surface roughness in an image (smoothing), correction of defects (e.g. noise), extraction of edges, identification of points, strengthening texture elements and improving contrast. In enhancement, two types of operations can be distinguished: pixel-based (point operations) and neighbourhood-based (matrix operations). The most important pixel-based operations are linear stretching of grey values, application of pre-stored LUTs and histogram equalisation. The neighbourhood-based operations work with so-called filters. These are organising elements with an original or initial point in their centre. Filters can be used to accentuate or to suppress specific structures within the image. Filters can work either in the spatial or in the frequency domain. The method used for analysing alterations of grey value intensities in the frequency domain is the Hartley transform. Filter operations in the spatial domain can be based on averaging or ranking the grey values occurring in the organising element. The most important filters, which are usually applied, are the Gaussian filter and the Laplace filter (both averaging filters), and the median filter, the top hat filter and the range operator (all ranking filters). The principal advantage of ranking filters over averaging operators is that they do not reduce the brightness difference across steps. The edges remain in place and well-defined. Very important prerequisites for extracting quantitative information from digitised images are clearly identifiable segmented objects and knowledge about instrumental and technical influences on the results (glare effect and thickness of histological slides). Segmentation of objects is traditionally based on threshold grey values. The grey value histogram of the original or enhanced image is an important tool for setting threshold levels. For determining the threshold grey value, bidimensional histograms can be applied. Quantitative information can be extracted from images by mathematical operations on binary images or on grey scale images. Boolean operations on binary images are applied when one desires to combine the information contained in several binary images. The morphological operations on binary images mainly include erosion and dilation, and modifications of these operations. There are many methods allowing direct quantitation of segmented objects within grey scale images. They use different sets of parameters: planimetric, histogram-derived, densitometric, co-occurrence matrix-derived parameters, invariant moments, run lengths, parameters of quantitative immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry, parameters of silver-stained nucleolar organiser regions (AgNORs) and parameters of cellular sociology. Digital image analysis requires a distinction between two phases for the evaluation procedure: generation of fundamental data (x- andy-coordinates and grey values of the pixels, immediately after object segmentation) and calculation of parameters from these data. The data generated during segementation must remain always available and these data must be conceptually separated from the parameters deduced from them. With such a data organisation it is no longer necessary to repeat the object segmentation if new algorithms should be applied on objects which earlier were segmented. In dealing with methods or instruments for digital image analysis, it is always essential to know precisely the characteristics of both of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abmayr W (1994) Einführung in die digitale Bildverarbeitung. Teubner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubele M, Auer G, Gais P, Jütting U, Rodenacker K, Voss A (1994) Nucleolus organiser regions (AgNORs) in ductal mammary carcinoma: comparison with classifications and prognosis. Pathol Res Pract 190:129–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aubele M, Auer G, Jütting U, Falkmer U, Gais P (1994) Prognostic value of quantitatively measured AgNORs in ductal mammary carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 16:211–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beucher S, Lantejoul C (1979) Use of watersheds in contour detection. Proceedings of the international workshop on image processing. CCETT, Rennes (France)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bins M, Poppema S (1986) Tetraploidy of centroblasts in lymphomas demonstrated in thin tissue sections. In: Mary JV, Rigaut JP (eds) Quantitative image analysis in cancer cytology and histology. Elsevier Science Publishers (Biomedical Division). Amsterdam, pp 321–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Bins M, Takens F (1985) A method to estimate the DNA content of whole nuclei from measurements made on thin tissue sections. Cytometry 6:234–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böcking A, Giroud F, Reith A (1995) Consensus report of the ESACP task force on standardisation of diagostic DNA image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 8:67–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bright DS, Steel EB (1986) Bright-field image correction with various image-processing tools. In: Romig AD, Chambers WF (eds). Microbeam analysis 1986. San Francisco Press, San Francisco, pp 517–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen MH, Wu MY (1992) Morphometric study on AgNORs of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and paraneoplastic epithelial cells. Acta Stereol 11:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen H, Oberholzer M, Buser M, Lötscher R, Gschwind R, Rösel F, Ettlin R, Feess A, Dalquen P (1989) Digital image analysis in cytological diagnosis: a morphometric analysis on plenural mesotheliomas. Anal Cell Pathol 1:105–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coster M, Chermant JL (1985) Précis d'analyse d'images. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche scientifique. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies ER (1988) On the noise suppression and image enhancement characteristics of the median, truncated median and mode filters. Pattern Recogn Lett 7:87–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Erler BS, Marchevsky AM (1994) Microphotometry in pathology In: Marchevsky AM, Bartels PH (eds) Image analysis. A primer for pathologists. Raven Press, New York, pp 181–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder J (1988) Fractals Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feulgen R, Rossenbeck H (1924) Mikroskopisch-chemischen Nachweis einer Nucleinsäure vom Typus der Thymonukleinsäure und die darauf beruhende elektive Färbung von Zellkernen in mikroskopischen Präparaten. Physiol Chem 135:203–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway MM (1975) Texture analysis using grey level run lengths. Comput Graph Image Process 4:172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbay C, Chassery JM, Brugal G (1986) An iterative region-growing process for cell image segmentation based on local color similarity and global shape criteria. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 8:25–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein GJ (1970) Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. I. Stray light (glare). J Microsc 92:1–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales R, Wintz P (1987) Digital image processing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Gschwind R, Umbricht CB, Torhorst J, Oberholzer M (1986) Evaluation of shape descriptors for the morphometric analysis of cell nuclei. Pathol Res Pract 181:213–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haberäcker P (1989) Digitale Bildverarbeitung. Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Carl Hanser, Munich Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst 3:610–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroske G, Dimmer V, Herrmann WR, Kunze KD, Meyer W (1984) Metastasizing APUD cell tumours of the human gastrointestinal tract: light microscopic and karyometric studies. Pathol Res Pract 178:63–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroske G, Meyer W, Dimmer V, Kunze KD, Theissig F (1993) Feasibility and limitations of a cytometric DNA ploidy analysis procedure in tissue sections. Zentralbl Pathol 139:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu MK (1962) Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans Inf Theory 8:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst HE, Black RP, Simaika YM (1965) Long term storage: an experimental study. Constable, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis LR (1980) Microdensitometry with image analyser video scanners. J Microsc 121:337–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Julis I, Mikes J (1992) True colour image analysis and histopathology. Eur Microsc Anal 19:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann D, Hilgers CH (1994) Glare-correction in DNA image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 6:165–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lantejoul C, Beucher S (1981) On the use of the geodesic metric in image analysis. J Microsc 121:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkovits M (1993) Differenzierung von dysplastischen Kolonadenomen mittels statischer Morphometric. Inaugural dissertation, Medical Faculty, University of Basel

  • Lutz RW, Pun T, Pellegrini C (1991) Colour displays and look-up tables: real time modification of digital images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 15:73–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacAulay C, Tezcan H, Palcic B (1989) Adaptive color basis transformation. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11:53–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcelpoil R, Usson Y (1992) Methods for the study of cellular sociology: Voronoi diagrams and parametrization of the spatial relationships. J Theor Biol 154:359–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldenhauer JH (1993) Die prognostiche Bedeutung bildanalytischer Kernparameter von Prostatakarzinomen. Inaugural dissertation, Medical Faculty, University of Basel

  • Naora H (1951) Microspectrophotometry and cytochemical analysis of nucleic acids. Science 114:279–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naora H (1955) Microspectrophotometry of cell nucleus stained by Feulgen reaction, I. Microspectrophotometric apparatus without Schwarzschild-Villiger effect. Exp Cell Res 8:259–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberholzer M, Fischer HR, Christen H, Gerber S, Brühlmann M, Mihatsch MJ, Gahm T, Famos M, Winkler C, Fehr P, Hosch HJ, Bächtold L (1995) A perspective to telepathology: frozen section diagnosis at a distance. Virchows Arch 426:3–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli C (1993) Morphometrische Untersuchungen an Lungenmakrophagen bei Patienen mit chronischer Bronchitis, AIDS und Karzinomen in der Lunge. Inaugural dissertation, Medical Faculty, University of Basel

  • Pavlidis LD, Heath JP (1980) Reconstruction from stereo and multiple electron microscopy images of thick sections of embedded biological specimens using computer graphics methods. J Microsc 153:193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves AA (1990) Optimized fast Hartley transform for the MC68000 with applications in image processing. Thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld A, Kak AC (1982) Digital image processing. Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüschoff J, Bittinger A, Gogolok A, Von Keitz A, Ulshöfer B (1992) Quantitation of AgNORs in urothelial cancer — evaluation of diagnostic parameters in histology and cytology. Acta Stereol 11:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüschoff J, Prasser C, Cortez T, Höhne HM, Hohenberger W, Hofstädter F (1993) Diagnostic value of AgNOR staining in follicular cell neoplasms of the thyroid: comparison of evaluation methods and nucleolar features. Am J Surg Pathol 17:1281–1288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russ JC (1990) Processing images with a local Hurst operator to reveal texture differences. J Comput Assist Microsc 4:249–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ JC (1992) The image processing handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ JC, Russ JC (1988) Improved implementation of a convex segmentation algorithm. Acta Stereol 7:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders H, Crocker J (1993) A simple technique for the measurement of fractal dimension in histopathological specimens. J Pathol. 169:383–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter BJ, Davis LS, Rosenfeld A (1976) Scene segmentation by cluster detection in color spaces. SIGART Newslett 58:16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra J (1982) Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotton DM (1995) Electronic light microscopy: present capabilities and future prospects. Histochem Cell Biol 104:97–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souchier C (1992) Stepwise discriminant analysis: an aid for color image segmentation. Acta Stereol 11:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Toet A (1992) Multiscale color image enhancement. Pattern Recogn Lett 13:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker JH (1979) An image analysis system for cervical cytology automation using nuclear DNA content. J Histochem Cytochem 27:613–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gool L, Dewaele P, Ooosterlinck A (1985) Texture analysis anno 1983. Comput Vision Graph Image Processing 29:336–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibel ER (1979) Stereological methods. I. Practical methods for biological morphometry. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg DS (1994) Quantitative immunocytochemistry in pathology. In: Marchevsky AM, Bartels PH (eds) Image analysis. A primer for pathologists. Raven Press, New York, pp 235–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamperoni P (1989) Methoden der digitalen Bildsignalverarbeitung. Vieweg, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oberholzer, M., Östreicher, M., Christen, H. et al. Methods in quantitative image analysis. Histochem Cell Biol 105, 333–355 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463655

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463655

Keywords

Navigation