Summary
Following the examples of Hicks and Modigliani, most economists treat neoclassical and Keynesian theories as special cases of a more general model. In the opinion of Clower, Leijonhufvud and Shackle, Keynes differs from the neoclassics in assuming incomplete information. An analysis of non-tâtonnement pricing shows that the positive correlation between unemployment and real wage rates, still adhered to by Keynes, need not exist. With non-tâtonnement pricing and an-product economy, idleness of capital goods can be explained. The macro-economic production function, implying as it does a one-product, one-producer economy, is misleading.
Similar content being viewed by others
Geciteerde literatuur
G. Ackley,Macroeconomic Theory, Macmillan, New York 19692.
A. A. Alchian, Information Costs, Pricing, and Resource Unemployment, in Phelps e.a., 1971.
R. G. D. Allen,Macroeconomic Theory, Macmillan, London 1967.
K. J. Arrow,Toward a Theory of Price Adjustment, in The Allocation of Economic Resources, Essays in Honor of Bernard Francis Haley, Stanford University Press, Stanford 19612.
M. Blaug,Economic Theory in Retrospect, herziene ed., Irwin, Homewood 1968.
F. S. Brooman en H. D. Jacoby,Macroeconomics, Aldine, Chicago 1970.
K. Brunner, The Monetarist View of Keynesian Ideas,Lloyds Bank Review, no. 102, 1971.
G. Cassel,The Theory of Social Economy, Kelley, New York 1967.
E. M. Claassen,Monnaie, revenu national et prix, Dunod, Parijs 1968.
R. W. Clower, The Keynesian Counterrevolution; A Theoretical Appraisal, in F. H. Hahn en F. P. R. Brechling, 1966.
M. Friedman, A Theoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis,Journal of Political Economy, jrg. 78, no. 2, 1970.
F. H. Hahn en F. P. R. Brechling (red.),The Theory of Interest Rates, Macmillan, London 19662.
B. Hansen,A Survey of General Equilibrium Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York 1970.
R- F. Harrod,Money, Macmillan, Londen 1969.
J. R. Hicks,Value and Capital, tweede ed., Oxford University Press, Londen 19658.
J. R. Hicks, Mr. Keynes and the ‘Classics’, in J. R. Hicks,Critical Essays in Monetary Theory, Oxford University Press, Londen 1967; eerder inEconometrica, jrg. 5, no. 2, 1937 (a).
J. R. Hicks, The ‘Classics’ Again, in J. R. Hicks,Critical Essays, a.w. (b).
A. G. Hines,On the Reappraisal of Keynesian Economics, Martin Robertson, Londen 1971.
H. G. Johnson, Monetary Theory and Keynesian Economics, in H. G. Johnson,Money, Trade and Economic Growth, Allen and Unwin, Londen 1962; eerder in Pakistan Economic journal, jrg. VIII, no. 2, 1958 (a).
H. G. Johnson, The General Theory after Twenty-Five Years, in H. G. Johnson,Money, Trade and Economic Growth, a.w. ; eerder inAmerican Economic Review, jrg. LI, no. 3, 1961 (b).
H. G. Johnson, Recent Developments in Monetary Theory - A Commentary, in D. R. Croome en H. G. Johnson (red.), Money in Britain 1959-1969, Oxford University Press, Londen 1970.
J. M. Keynes, Social Consequences of Changes in the Value of Money, in J. M. Keynes,Essays in Persuasion, Macmillan, Londen 1931; eerder verschenen in J. M. Keynes, A Tract on Monetary Reform, Macmillan, Londen 1923 (a).
J. M. Keynes, The Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill, in J. M. Keynes,Essays in Persuasion, a.w.; eerder versehenen in 1925 (b).
J. M. Keynes,The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan, Londen 196113.
L. R. Klein,The Keynesian Revolution, tweede ed., Macmillan, Londen 19702.
D. E. W. Laidler, The Influence of Money on Economic Activity - A Survey of Some Current Problems, in G. Clayton, J. C. Gilbert en R. Sedgwick (red.),Monetary Theory and Monetary Policy in the 1970s, Oxford University Press, Londen 1971.
A. Leijonhufvud, On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes, Oxford University Press, New York 1968.
A. Leijonhufvud, Keynes and the Keynesians; A Suggested Interpretation, in R. W. Clover (red.),Monetary Theory, Penguin, Harmondsworth 1969; eerder inAmerican Economic Review, jrg. LVII, no. 2, 1967 (a).
A. Leijonhufvud,Keynes and the Classics, Institute of Economic Affairs, Londen 1969 (Occasional Paper 30) (b).
F. Modigliani, Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money, in F. A. Lutz en L. W. Mints (red.),Readings in Monetary Theory, Allen and Unwin, London 19623; eerder in Econometrica jrg. 12, 1944.
R. A. Mundell,Monetary Theory, Goodyear, Pacific Palisades 1971.
D. A. Nichols, Market Clearing for Heterogeneous Capital Goods, in Phelps e.a., 1971.
D. Patinkin, Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds: Stock and Flow Analysis,Economica, n.s. jrg. XXV, no. 100, 1958.
D. Patinkin, Money, Interest, and Prices, tweede ed., Harper & Row, New York 19693.
J. Pen,MV versusC + I; een standpunt, in A. A. J. Smulders (red.),Monetaire theorie, Agon Elsevier, Amsterdam/Brussel 1965; eerder in Tijdschrift voor documentatie en voorlichting, jrg. 36, dl. I no. 4, 1961.
E. S. Phelps, Money Wage Dynamics and Labor Market Equilibrium, in Phelps e.a., 1971.
E. S. Phelps e.a.,Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory, Macmillan, Londen 1971.
M. H. Ross, in Topics in Money - Discussion,American Economic Review, jrg. LVII, no. 2, Papers and Proceedings, 1967.
P. A. Samuelson,Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) 19668.
G. L. S. Shackle, Recent Theories Concerning the Nature and Role of Interest, inSurveys of Economic Theory, deel I, Macmillan, Londen 19673 (a).
G. L. S. Shackle,The Years of High Theory, Cambridge University Press, London 1967 (b).
G. L. S. Shackle,Expectations, Investment, and Income, tweede ed., Oxford University Press, London 1968.
W. L. Smith, A Graphical Exposition of the Complete Keynesian System, in M. G. Mueller (red.),Readings in Macroeconomics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London 1969; eerder inSouthern Economic journal, jrg. 23, 1956.
G. J. Stigler, The Economics of Information,Journal of Political Economy, jrg. LXIX, no. 3, 1961; herdrukt in G. J. Stigler,The Organization o f Industry, Irwin, Homewood 1968.
D. P. Tucker, Macroeconomic Models and the Demand for Money under Market Disequilibrium,Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, jrg. III, no. 1, 1971.
A. J. Vermaat, De wet van Walras,De Economist, jrg. 116, nos. 4 en 5, 1968.
H. Visser, Neutraal geld; een overzicht,De Economist, jrg. 119, no. 4, 1971.
L. Walras,Elements of Pure Econimics (vert. W. Jaffé), Allen and Unwin, London 19652.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visser, H. Keynes en de neoklassieken: Een herinterpretatie. De Economist 120, 27–51 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01461250
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01461250