Skip to main content
Log in

Group psychotherapy with borderline patients: Contrasting remainers and dropouts

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

Borderline patients present major treatment difficulties in almost every treatment modality. The reason borderlines drop out or fail to benefit from therapy are obscure. Some findings points to the important factor of therapist and patient fit. In the present study, two therapy groups with borderline patients were followed for 20 months. In the study, the therapists were found to individualize the process and their interventions were found to be unevenly distributed among future remainers and dropouts especially during periods of group instability. The results were interpreted along with the Pygmalion hypothesis, that is, that the fit and the therapists' perceived trustworthiness were crucial factors for group psychotherapy outcome for borderline patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armelius, B.-Å., & Kullgren, G. (1986). Soft modelling of the psychological characteristics of suicided and non-suicided borderline patients.Department of Applied Psychology Reports, 14, Umeå University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior.Psychological Review, 81, 392–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conelly, J. L., Piper, W. E., DeCarufel, F. L., & Debbane, E. G. (1986). Premature termination in group psychotherapy: Pretherapy and early therapy predictors.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 36, 145–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogathis, L., Lipman, R., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale—a preliminary report.Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, J., Spitzer, R., Fleiss, J., & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale.Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766–771.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, J. G. & Kolb, J. E. (1981). The Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients.American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 896–903.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, J. G., Frank, A., Lynch, V.J., & Wolf, P.J. (1986). Borderline patients who drop out of psychotherapy. Paper presented at the 139th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Gunderson, J. G., & Zanarini, M. C. (1987). Current overview of the borderline diagnosis.Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, J. G., Frank, A., Ronningstam, E. R., et al. (1989). Early discontinuance of borderline patients from psychotherapy.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 38–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, J., Waldinger, R., Sabo, A. N. & Najavits, L. M. (1993). Stages of change in dynamic psychotherapy with borderline patients.Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 2, 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. M. (1986). Understanding reactions to group instability in psychotherapy groups.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 36, 241–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. F. (1981). Structural interviewing.Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 4, 169–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, U., & Smith, G. J. W. (1970).Percept-genetic analysis. Lund: Gleerups.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlashan, T. H. (1983). Omnipotence, helplessness and control with the borderline patient.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 37, 49–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B. E. (1980). Understanding the development of a homogeneous identity impaired group through countertransference phenomena.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 30 (4), 405–426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B. E. (1990). Countertransference and the group therapists state of mind. In B. E. Roth, W. N. Stone & H. D. Kibel (Eds.),The difficult patient in group. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., & Howard, K. I. (1988). A follow up study of very early terminators from the psychotherapy delivery system. 19th Annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Santa Fe, NM.

  • Stiwne, D. (1989a). Drop-out from borderline therapy groups related to therapist interventions and group instability.Department of Applied Psychology Reports, 25. University of Umea, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiwne, D. (1989b). Borderline patients in group psychotherapy: Studies in process and outcome. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Applied Psychology, University of Umea, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiwne, D. (1989c). Borderline relatedness: A process study of borderline patients' relatedness during group psychotherapy.Department of Applied Psychology Reports, 27. University of Umea, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockton, R., Barr, J. E., & Klein, R. (1981). Identifying the group dropout: A review of the literature.Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 6, 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttman, S. (1990). Principles of psychoanalytic group therapy applied to the treatment of border-line and narcissistic disorders. In B. Roth, W. Stone, & H. Kibel (Eds.),The difficult patient in the group. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E. (1992). The beginning of wisdom is never calling a patient a borderline.Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 1, 117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, S., Albano, C., & Dunn, W. (1983). Pattern recognition: Finding regularities in multivariate data. In H. Martens & H. Russworm (Eds.),Food research and data analysis. London: Applied Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stiwne, D. Group psychotherapy with borderline patients: Contrasting remainers and dropouts. Group 18, 37–45 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01459717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01459717

Keywords

Navigation