Abstract
The treatment of patients in combined individual and group therapy presents a challenge in terms of theory and technique. The inevitable paradoxes that arise in this modality can confound even the most experienced clinician. This paper delineates some of the conflicts, examines some of the advantages and disadvantages of combined treatment, and addresses the contraindications for some patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, A., & Rutan, J. S. (1988). The experience of shame and the restoration of self respect in groups.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38(1), 3–14.
Caligor, J., Fieldsteel, N., & Brok, A. (1984).Individual group therapy. New York: Basic Books.
Ormont, L., & Strean, H. (1978).The practice of conjoint therapy. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Pfeiffer, G., & Spinner, D. (1985). Combined individual and group psychotherapy with children: An ego developmental perspective.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 35(1), 11–36.
Porter, K. (1980). Combined individual and group psychotherapy: A review of the literature 1965–1978.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 30(1), 107–114.
Rutan, J. S., & Alonso, A. (1982). Group therapy, individual therapy, or both?International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 32(3), 267–282.
Slavinska-Holy, N. (1983). Combining individual and homogeneous group psychotherapies for borderline conditions.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 33(3), 297–321.
Stone, W. N., & Rutan, J. S. (1984). Duration of treatment in group psychotherapy: A private practice experience.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 34(1), 39–46.
Wong, N. (1980). Combined group and individual treatment of borderline and narcissistic patients: Heterogeneous versus homogeneous groups.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 30(4), 389–404.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alonso, A., Rutan, J.S. Common dilemmas in combined individual and group treatment. Group 14, 5–12 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01458117
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01458117