Skip to main content
Log in

Some comments on the role of cotherapists in group psychotherapy with borderline patients

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

This paper points out examples of patients in a psychotherapy group who meet DSM-III criteria for the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and who are treated by cotherapists utilizing object relations theory. Interpretations of phenomena shown by borderline patients—splitting, projective identification and denial—are illustrated. How cotherapy lends itself to the recognition and management of the problems these patients bring to group psychotherapy is illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition. Washington. DC: APA, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRIEDMAN, H. J. Psychotherapy of borderline patients: The influence of theory on technique.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1975, 132:1048–1052.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GODENNE, G. D. Outpatient management of the borderline adolescent.Adolescence, 1978, 52:615–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • HORWITZ, L. Group psychotherapy of the borderline patient. In P. Hartocollis (Ed.),Borderline Personality Disorders: The Concept, the Syndrome, the Patient. New York: International Universities Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • KERNBERG, O. R. Notes on countertransference.Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 1965, 13:38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • KERNBERG, O. R.Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • KERNBERG, O. R.Object Relations Theory and Clinical Psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIBEL, H. D. The rationale for the use of group psychotherapy for borderline patients on a short-term unit.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1978, 28:339–358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCHEIDLINGER, S. & PYRKE, M. Group therapy of women with severe dependency problems.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1961, 31:776–785.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SHAPIRO, E. R. The psychodynamics and developmental psychology of the borderline patient: A review of the literature.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1978, 135:1305–1315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SHAPIRO, E. R., SHAPIRO, R. L., ZINNER, J. et al. The borderline ego and the working alliance: Indications for family and individual treatment in adolescence.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1977, 58:77–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPOTNITZ, H. The borderline schizophrenic in group psychotherapy: The importance of individualization.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1957, 7:155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • WINNICOTT, D. W. The depressive position in normal emotional development. InCollected Papers: Through Pediatrics to Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZETZEL, E. A developmental approach to the borderline patient.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, 127:867–871.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Hope Aspell assisted in the editing of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenblum, D.N., Pinney, E.L. Some comments on the role of cotherapists in group psychotherapy with borderline patients. Group 6, 41–47 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01456573

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01456573

Keywords

Navigation