Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some geophysical and geodetic contributions of satellite-determined gravity results

  • Published:
Geophysical surveys Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Satellite orbital data yield reliable values of low degree and order coefficients in the spherical harmonic expansion of the Earth's gravity field. The second degree coefficient yields the shape of the Earth — probably the most important single parameter in geodesy. It is crucial in the numerical evaluation of different forms of the theoretical gravity formula. The new information requires the standardization of gravity anomalies obtained from satellite gravity and terrestrial gravity data in the context of three most commonly used reference figures, e.g.,International Reference Ellipsoid, Reference Ellipsoid 1967, andEquilibrium Reference Ellipsoid. This standardization is important in the comparison and combination of satellite gravity and gravimetric data as well as the integration of surface gravity data, collected with different objectives, in a single reference system.

Examination of the nature of satellite gravity anomalies aids in the geophysical and geodetic interpretation of these anomalies in terms of the tectonic features of the Earth and the structure of the Earth's crust and mantle. Satellite results also make it possible to compute the Potsdam correction and Earth's equatorial radius from the satellite-determined geopotential. They enable the decomposition of the total observed gravity anomaly into components of geophysical interest. They also make it possible to study the temporal variations of the geogravity field. In addition, satellite results make significant contributions in the prediction of gravity in unsurveyed areas, as well as in providing a check on marine gravity profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bullard, E. C.: 1948, ‘The Figure of the Earth’,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., Geophys. Suppl. 5, 186–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, M.: 1965, ‘The Minimum Strength of the Earth’,J. Geophys. Res. 70, 955–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A. H.: 1959, ‘The External Gravity Field of a Rotating Spheroid to the Order ofe 3’,Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. London 2, 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egyed, L.: 1964, ‘The Satellite Geoid and the Structure of the Earth’Nature 203, 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, W., et al.: 1965 ‘Report to the Executive Committee of the Working Group of the System of Astronomical Constants’,Bull. Géod., No. 75, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hide, R. and Malin, S. R. C.: 1970, ‘Novel Correlations Between Global Features of the Earth's Gravitational and Magnetic Fields,’Nature 225, 605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskenan, W. A. and Moritz, H.: 1967,Physical Geodesy, W. H. Freeman and Co.

  • Henriksen, S. W.: 1960, ‘The Hydrostatic Flattening of the Earth’,Ann. Int. Geophys. Year. 12 197–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H.: 1952,The Earth, Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Jeffreys, H.: 1963, ‘On the Hydrostatic Theory of the Earth’,Geophys. J. 8, 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaula, W. M.: 1967, ‘Comparison and Combination of Satellites With Other Results for Geodetic Parameters,’The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, II, National Technical University, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A.: 1967, ‘Some Parameters of a Hydrostatic Earth’,Trans Am. Geophys. U. 48, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A.: 1969, ‘General Solution of the Problem of Hydrostatic Equilibrium of the Earth’,Geophys. J., Roy, Astron. Soc. 18, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A.: 1971, ‘Some Geophysical Implications of the Satellite-Determined Geogravity Field’,Geophys. J., Roy. Astron. Soc., London 23, 15–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A.: 1972, ‘Nature of Satellite-Determined Gravity Anomalies’,The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, Geophysical Monograph No. 15, Am. Geophys. U., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A.: 1973a, ‘Equatorial Radius of the Earth: A Dynamical Determination’,Bull. Géod., No. 109, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A.: 1973b, ‘Hydrostatic Figure of the Earth: Theory and Results’, Goddard Space Flight Center Rep. No. X-592-73-105.

  • Khan, M. A.:Westward Drift and Other Secular Variations of the Geogravity Field (in prep.).

  • Khan, M. A. and O'Keefe, J. A.: 1973, ‘Recommended Reference Figures for Geophysics and Geodesy’, Goddard Space Flight Center Rep. No. X-592-73-318.

  • Khan, M. A. and O'Keefe, J. A.: 1974, ‘Relation of Antarctic Gravity Low to the Earth's Equilibrium Figure’,J. Geophys. Res. 79, 3027–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A. and Strange, W. M.: 1966, ‘Investigations on the Shape of Geoid in North America’,Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un. 47, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck, K.: 1971, ‘The Relation of Some Geodetic Datums to a Global Geocentric Reference System’,Bull. Géod., No. 99, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, F., Wagner, C. A., Richardson, J. A., and Brownd, J. E.: 1974, ‘Goddard Earth Models (5 and 6)’, Goddard Space Flight Center Rep. No. X-921-74-145.

  • O'Keefe, J. A.: 1960, ‘Determination of the Earth's Gravitational Field’,Space Research 1, 448–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. H.: 1970, ‘Methods for the Computation of Geoidal Undulations From Potential Coefficients’, Ohio State University, Department of Geodetic Science Rep. No. 132.

  • de Sitter, W.: 1924, ‘On the Flattening and the Constitution of the Earth’,Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 2, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sitter, W.: 1938, ‘On the System of Astronomical Constants’,Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 8, 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, W. M. and Khan, M. A.: 1965, ‘The Prediction of Gravity in Unsurveyed Areas Using a Combination of Satellite and Surface Gravity Data’,Trans. Am. Geophys. U. 46, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuman, V. W.: 1966, ‘The Satellite Geoid May Have a Westward Drift’, Nature210, 826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veis, G.: 1965, ‘The Deflection of the Vertical of Major Geodetic Datums and the Semimajor Axis of the Earth's Ellipsoid as Obtained From Satellite Observations’,Space Research V, North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veis, G.: 1967, ‘The Determination of the Radius of the Earth and Other Geodetic Parameters as Derived From Optical Satellite Data’, Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Rep. No. 264.

  • Vogel, A.: 1968, ‘The Question of Secular Variations in the Earth's Gravity Field From Mass Displacements in the Earth's Deep Interior’,Bull. Géod., No. 88, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. A.: 1973, ‘Does λ22 Vary?’,J. Geophys. Res. 78, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woollard, G. P. and Khan, M. A.: 1972, ‘Prediction of Gravity in Ocean Areas’, Haw. Inst. of Geophys. Rep. No. HIG-72-11.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Sciences Corporation, 8728 Colesville Road, 20910, Silver Spring, Md, USA

    M. A. Khan

Authors
  1. M. A. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

On leave from University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, M.A. Some geophysical and geodetic contributions of satellite-determined gravity results. Geophysical Surveys 2, 469–496 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01454195

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01454195

Keywords

Search

Navigation