Acta Mechanica

, Volume 145, Issue 1–4, pp 159–172 | Cite as

Unsteady MHD forced flow due to a point sink

  • A. T. Eswara
  • S. Roy
  • G. Nath
Original Papers


An analysis is performed to study the unsteady laminar incompressible boundary-layer flow of an electrically conducting fluid in a cone due to a point sink with an applied magnetic field. The unsteadiness in the flow is considered for two types of motion, viz. the motion arising due to the free stream velocity varying continuously with time and the transient motion occurring due to an impulsive change either in the strength of the point sink or in the wall temperature. The partial differential equations governing the flow have been solved numerically using an implicit finite-difference scheme in combination with the quasilinearization technique. The magnetic field increases the skin friction but reduces heat transfer. The heat transfer and temperature field are strongly influenced by the viscous dissipation and Prandtl number. The velocity field is more affected at the early stage of the transient motion, caused by an impulsive change in the strength of the point sink, as compared to the temperature field. When the transient motion is caused by a sudden change in the wall temperature, both skin friction and heat transfer take more time to reach a new steady state. The transient nature of the flow and heat transfer is active for a short time in the case of suction and for a long time in the case of injection. The viscous dissipation prolongs the transient behavior of the flow.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Choi, S. H., Wilhelm, H. E.: Self-similar magneto hydrodynamic diffuser flows with induced magnetic fields. Phys. Fluids20, 1821–1826 (1977).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Rosenhead, L. (ed.): Laminar boundary-layers, pp 427–428. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1963.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ackerberg, R. C.: The viscous incompressible flow inside a cone. J. Fluid Mech.21, 47–81 (1965).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Asatur, K. G., Kolton, G. A.: Laminar boundary-layer in an axisymmetric convergent duct. Fluid Mechanics (Soviet Research)20, 24–27 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Takhar, H. S., Surma Devi, C. D., Nath, G.: MHD flow with heat and mass transfer due to a point sink. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Math.17, 1242–1247 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Schercliff, J. A.: A textbook on MHD. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1967.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bellman, R. E., Kalaba, R. E.: Quasi-linearization and nonlinear boundary value problems. New York: Elsevier 1965.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Inouye, K., Tate, A.: Finit-difference version of quasi-linearization applied to boundary-layer equations. A.I.A.A.J12, 558–560 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hildebrand, F. B.: Introduction to numerical analysis, p. 99. New York: McGraw-Hill 1974.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Keller, H. B., Cebeci, T.: Accurate numerical methods for boundary-layer flows. II. Two-dimensional turbulent flows. A.I.A.A.J.10, 1193–1199 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Cramer, K. R., Pai, S. I.: Magnetofluid dynamics for engineers and applied physicists. New York: McGraw-Hill 1973.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Glauret, M. B.: A study of magnetohydrodynamic boundary-layer on a flat plate. J. Fluid Mech.10, 276–288 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Schlichting, H.: Boundary-layer theory. New York: McGraw-Hill 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. T. Eswara
    • 1
  • S. Roy
    • 2
  • G. Nath
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsMalnad College of EngineeringHasanIndia
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsIndian Institute of TechnologyMadrasIndia
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations