Abstract
During the period since the Workshops in Sopron and Murnau we have witnessed some quite remarkable changes in the techniques employed in magnetotelluric (MT) observations. These changes have brought about significant improvements in the quality of MT data that can be gathered today. The new techniques are very likely to bring improvements in many areas beside MT, but are reviewed here in the light of the progress they have rendered possible for MT soundings on land. Three main subjects are covered in this review. The first one is concerned with the use of cryogenic or SQUID magnetometers. The new instruments are presented to the geomagnetist. An explanation of how these instruments work is given without, however, details of their operation and fabrication, and without showing that they usually have a much larger, i.e. better, signal-to-noise ratio than conventional magnetometers. Next, the method of the remote magnetic reference is examined. Originally the MT method assumed incident signals in the form of plane waves. While it is known today that incident wave amplitudes which vary linearly with distance are perfectly acceptable for MT soundings, there are many other higher order distortions of the incident signal which are not acceptable. Most of these high order or local perturbations are man-made and can seriously falsify MT data. All processes of MT data analysis try to minimize the errors caused by locally perturbed signals. But they are only partly successful, especially when the perturbations produce strong cross-power bias. The remote magnetic reference method has proved far superior in avoiding most of this cross-power as well as faulty autopower. The last section of this review deals with the use in the field of microcomputers or microprocessors. These have made it possible to process the data on the site already to such a degree that the sounding crew knows whether the sounding is proceeding satisfactorily, and can decide how best to continue the survey work. Of particular interest is digital filtering, which is especially easy with the microcomputer, and which may be used to avoid specific sources of perturbation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonanomi, J.: 1979, ‘Horloges Asservies par Signaux Horaires’,Proc. Tenth Int. Congr. of Chronometry 2, 97–103.
Bonanomi, J., and Schumacher, P.: 1976a, ‘Synchronisation d'Horloges par Signaux Horaires’,La Suisse Horlogère 11–76, 229–235.
Bonanomi, J. and Schumacher, P.: 1976b,Quartz Clocks Synchronized by LF Time Signals, Proc. Eighth Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Applications and Planning Meeting, Washington, 135–146.
Buxton, J. L. and Fraser-Smith, A. C.: 1974, ‘A Superconducting System for High Sensitivity Measurements of PC 1 Geomagnetic Pulsations’,IEEE Trans. Geosc. Electronics GE-12, 109–113.
Clarke, J.: 1973, ‘Low-Frequency Applications of Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices’,Proc. IEEE 61, 8–19.
Clarke, J.: 1977, ‘Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices for Low Frequency Measurements’, in Schwartz, B. B. and Foner, S. (eds.),Superconductor Applications: Solids and Machines, Plenum Publ. Corp., New York, Chapter 3, pp. 67–124.
Clarke, J.: 1979, ‘Josephson Effect Devices’,Phys. Bull. 30, 206–208.
Clarke, J.: 1980, ‘Advances in SQUID Magnetometers’,IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices E-D-27, 1896–1908.
Clarke, J., Gamble, T. D., Goldstein, N., Goubau, W. M., Koch, R., and Miracky, R. F.: 1980, ‘Field Analysis of Magnetotelluric Data’,Abstract PM-30, Geophys. 45, 554.
Clarke, J., Gamble, T. D., and Goubau, W. M.: 1978, ‘SQUIDs and Magnetotellurics with a Remote Reference’, Invited talk to the Conference on Future Trends in Superconductive Electronics, Charlottesville, Virgina.
Clarke, J., Goubau, W. M., and Ketchen, M. B.: 1976, ‘Tunnel Junctiondc SQUID: Fabrication, Operation, and Performance’,J. Low Temp. Phys. 25, 94–144.
Dawes, G.: 1980, Private communication.
Dimitriev, V. I. and Berdichevsky, M. N.: 1979, ‘The Fundamental Model of Magnetotelluric Sounding’,Proc. IEEE 67, 1034–1044.
Elsner, R., Kröger, P., and Micheel, H.-J.: 1982, ‘Comparison of Error Analysis in Local and Reference Estimates of the MT Impedance Tensor’,J. Geophys./Zeit. Geophys, (in press).
Fischer, G.: 1980,Ein Eindimensionales Analytisches Magnetotellurisches Umkehrverfahren, Protokoll Kolloquium Elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung, West Berlin, pp. 231–242.
Fischer, G., Schnegg, P.-A., Peguiron, M., and Le Quang, B. V.: 1981, ‘An Analytic One-Dimensional Magnetotelluric Inversion Scheme’,Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 67, 257–278.
Fischer, G., and Schnegg, P.-A.: 1980, ‘The Dispersion Relations of the Magnetotelluric Response and Their Incidence on the Inversion Problem’,Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 62, 661–673.
Gamble, T. D., Goubau, W. M., and Clarke, J.: 1979a, ‘Magnetotellurics with a Remote Magnetic Reference’,Geophys. 44, 53–68.
Gamble, T. D., Goubau, W. M., and Clarke, J.: 1979b, ‘Error Analysis for Remote Reference Magnetotellurics’,Geophys. 44, 959–968.
Goubau, W. M., Gamble, T. D., and Clarke, J.: 1978, ‘Magnetotelluric Data Analysis: Removal of Bias’,Geophys. 43, 1157–1166.
Harris, F. J.: 1978, ‘On the Use of Windows for Harmonic Analysis with the Discrete Fourier Transfrom’,Proc. IEEE 66, 51–83.
Hermance, J. F. and Thayer, R. E.: 1975, ‘The Telluric-Magnetotelluric Method’,Geophys. 40, 664–668.
Hermance, J. F., Thayer, R. E., and Björnsson, A.: 1976,The Telluric-Magnetotelluric Method in The Regional Assessment of Geothermal Potential, Proc. Second U.N. Symposium on the Development and Use of Geothermal Resources2, 1037–1048, Stock No. 060-000-00005-1, Supt. Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
Kao, D. W. and Rankin, D.: 1977, ‘Enhancement of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Magnetotelluric Data’,Geophys. 42, 103–110.
Losecke, W., Scheelke, I., and Knödel, K.: 1978, ‘Magnetotellurische Tiefenerkundung in Norddeutschland’,Erdöl Kohle Erdgas Petrochem.31, 23–28.
Losecke, W., Knödel, K., and Müller, W.: 1979, ‘The Conductivity Distribution in the North German Sedimentary Basin Derived from Widely Spaced Areal Magnetotelluric Measurements’,Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 58, 169–179.
Schmucker, U.: 1980,Induktion in Geschichteten Halbräumen durch Inhomogene Felder, Protokoll Kolloquium Elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung, West Berlin, pp. 197–210.
Schnegg, P.-A. and Fischer, G.: 1979a, ‘On-Line Determination of the Apparent Resistivities in Audio Magnetotelluric Measurements’, Abstract and Oral Presentation at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German Geophys. Soc., p. 89.
Schnegg, P.-A. and Fischer, G.: 1979b, ‘On-Line Determination of the Apparent Resistivities in Audio Magnetotelluric Measurements’, Abstract and Oral Presentation at the 17th IUGG General Assembly,IAGA Bulletin 43, 172.
Schnegg, P.-A. and Fischer, G.: 1980, ‘On-Line Determination of the Apparent Resistivities in Audio Magnetotelluric Measurements’, Protokoll Kolloquium Elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung, West Berlin, pp. 173–184.
Schnegg, P.-A., Le Quang, B. V., and Fischer, G.: 1980, ‘Management and Processing of MT Data in the Field with a Microprocessor’. Presented at the Instanbul Workshop. A written copy of their report can be obtained from the authors.
Schumacher, P.: 1979, ‘Horloges de Précision Synchronisées par l'Emetteur HBG’,Proc. Tenth Int. Congr. of Chronometry 2, 91–95.
Silver, A. H. and Zimmerman, J. E.: 1967, ‘Quantum States and Transitions in Weakly Connected Superconducting Rings’,Phys. Rev. 157, 317–340.
Silverman, H. F.: 1977, ‘An Introduction to Programming the Winograd Fourier Transform Algorithm (WFTA)’,IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech and Sign. Process. ASSP-25, 152–165.
Sims, W. E. and Bostick, F. X. Jr.: 1969,Methods of Magnetotelluric Analysis, EGRL Tech. Rep. No. 58, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 86 p.
Sims, W. E., Bostick, F. X. Jr., and Smith, H. W.: 1971, ‘The Estimation of Magnetotelluric Impedance Tensor Elements from Measured Data’,Geophys. 36, 938–942.
Solymar, L.: 1972,Superconductive Tunnelling and Applications, Chapman and Hall, London, 406+XII pages.
Stanley, W. D., Boehl, J. E., Bostick, F. X., and Smith, H. W.: 1977, ‘Geothermal Significance of Magnetotelluric Sounding in the Eastern Snake River Plain — Yellowstone Region’,J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2501–2514.
Thayer, R. E., Björnsson, A., Alvarez, L., and Hermance, J. F.: 1981, ‘Magna Genesis and Crustal Spreading in the Northern Neovolcanic Zone of Iceland: Telluric-Magnetotelluric Constraints’,Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 65, 423–442.
Voss, R. F., Laibowitz, R. B., Raider, S. I., and Clarke, J.: 1980) ‘AI−Nb Low Noise dc-SQUID with 1 μm Tunnel Junctions’,J. Appl. Phys. 51, 2306–2309.
Vozoff, K.: 1980a, ‘Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics’,Geophys. Surveys 4, 9–29.
Vozoff, K.: 1980b, ‘Report on an Informal Workshop on Natural EM Fields at Audio Frequencies. Held under the Auspices of IAGA at the 1979 Assembly, Camberra’,IAGA News 18, 92–93.
Weidelt, P.: 1972, ‘The Inverse Problem of Geomagnetic Induction’,J. Geophys./Z. Geophys. 38, 257–289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, G. Magnetotelluric observational techniques on land. Geophysical Surveys 4, 373–393 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01449107
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01449107