Skip to main content
Log in

Uses of the past: Reflections on United States physics curriculum development 1955 to 1990

  • Part One: A Richer View of Education
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A personal assessment is made of the United States experience in physics curriculum development and teacher education over the past 35 years. It is concluded that, although substantial improvements were achieved in the development of hands-on primary and secondary school curricula, their effectiveness was in large part negated by logistic problems in implementation and deficiencies in teacher preparation. At the college/university level, existing materials tend to cover far too much material far too rapidly, and, except for small, separated pockets of promising activity, inadequate attention is being paid, in the aggregate, to students' levels of cognitive development and to the learning problems revealed in research on teaching and learning. Some directions of effort that might prove helpful are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arons, A. B. (1976). Cultivating the capacity for formal reasoning.American Journal of Physics,44(9), 834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1977).The various language: An inquiry approach to the physical sciences (with accompanying Teacher's Handbook). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1982). Phenomenology and logical reasoning in introductory physics courses.American Journal of Physics,50(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1983a, Spring). Achieving wider scientific literacy.Daedalus, pp. 91–122. (Issued as theProceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences,112(2); Cambridge, MA.)

  • Arons, A. B. (1983b). Student patterns of thinking and reasoning, part one.The Physics Teacher,21(9), 576–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1984a). Student patterns of thinking and reasoning, part two.The Physics Teacher,22(1), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1984b). Student patterns of thinking and reasoning, part three.The Physics Teacher,22(2), 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1984c). Education through science.Journal of College Science Teaching,13(4), 210–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1984d). Computer-based instructional dialogues in science courses.Science,224, 1051–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1985). Critical thinking and the baccalaureate curriculum.Liberal Education,71(2), 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arson, A. B. (1990).A guide to introductory physics teaching, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley Physics Course, The. (1965). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Bork, A. (1979). Interactive learning.American Journal of Physics,47, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodderman, T. (1982). The effects of activity-based science in elementary school. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.):Education in the ‘80’s: Science. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Assessment Program. (1984)Student achievement in California schools. Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L. (1976). A review of Piagetian studies relevant to science instruction at the secondary and college level.Science Education,60, 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics.American Journal of Physics,50(1) 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elementary Science Study (ESS). (no date). Nashua, NH: Delta Education.

  • Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1963).The Feynman lectures on physics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredette, N. H., & Clement, J. (1981) Student misconceptions of an electric circuit: What do they mean?Journal of College Science Teaching,10, 280–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1952, 1973).Introduction to concepts and theories in physical science (2nd ed., revised by S. Brush). Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G., Rutherford, F. J., & Watson, F. G. (1970, 1975).The project physics course. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber-Schaim, V., Dodge, J. H., & Walter J. (1991).PSSC physics. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. S. (1927). The unit method of instruction as applied to the teaching of physics.School Science and Mathematics,27, 844

    Google Scholar 

  • Introductory physical science. (1972, 1975). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Krieghbaum, H., & Rawson, H. (1969).An investment in knowledge. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. (1980). Relationship among level of intellectual development, cognitive style, and grades in a college biology course.Science Education,64(1), 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C., Piternick, L. K., & Rosenquist, M. L. (1980). Helping minority students succeed in science (Parts I, II, III).Journal of College Science Teaching,9, 135–140;9, 201–205; 9, 261–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics.Physics Today,37, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, J. W. & Renner, J. W. (1971). Are colleges concerned with intellectural development?American Journal of Physics,39(9), 1047–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the “at rest” condition of an object.The Physics Teacher,20, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural World, The (ISCS). (1975). Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett General Learning Corporation.

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972).Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P. C. (1982). Even honors students have conceptual difficulties with physics.American Journal of Physics,50(6), 501–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Physical Science II. (1972). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Reif, F., Larkin, J. H., & Brackett, G. C. (1976). Teaching general learning and problemsolving skills.American Journal of Physics,44(3), 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1983). Mathematics and science learning: A new conception.Science,220, 477–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science, A Process Approach (SAPA). Nashua, NH: Delta Education.

  • Science Curriculum Improvement Study (SCIS). Nashua, NH: Delta Education.

  • Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C. Jr., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,20(5), 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1990).They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier, Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension.American Journal of Physics,48(12), 1020–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension.American Journal of Physics,49(3), 242–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, R. T. (1978). Science: A basic for language and reading development. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.),What research says to the science teacher (vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whimbey, A., & Whimbey, L. S. (1975).Intelligence can be taught. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arons, A.B. Uses of the past: Reflections on United States physics curriculum development 1955 to 1990. Interchange 24, 105–128 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447343

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447343

Keywords

Navigation