Abstract
Science teachers wishing to implement educational research findings in their classrooms find themselves at a loss to choose between instructional prescriptions stemming from Piaget's theory of cognitive development and those stemming from alternative conceptual frameworks (ACF) theory. Piagetian theory attributes student comprehension difficulty in science to undeveloped cognitive structures and prescribes experiences aimed at causing disequilibration which in turn leads to accommodation and assimilation. ACF theorists argue that conceptualizations derived from everyday experience often impede science learning and that learners must be led to confront their misconceptions and reconstruct their knowledge. We claim that contextual teaching using large context problems or “science stories” addresses both the ACF and the Piagetian points of view. We first discuss contextual teaching using large context problems, then provide guidelines for large context problems and the writing of science stories. Finally, we outline a teaching program involving the design of historically based science contexts and stories for use in science classrooms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, D., & Whyte, R. (1980). Learning and teaching strategies.Canadian Journal of Education,5(2), 23–42.
Arons, A. B. (1989). Historical and philosophical perspectives attainable in introductory physics courses.Educational Philosophy and Theory,20(2), 13–23.
Aufshnaiter, von S., & Schwedes, H. (1989). Play orientation in physics education.Science Education,73(4), 467–479.
Baeyer, von H. C. (1990, November). Two-way street.The Sciences, pp. 13–15.
Conant, J. (1947).On understanding science: An historical approach. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Conant, J. (1957).Harvard case histories in experimental science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
di Sessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. B. Pufall (Eds.),Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 49–70). London: Academic Press.
Duschl, R., Hamilton, R, & Greudy, R. (1990). Psychology and epistemology: Match or mismatch when applied to science education?International Journal of Science Education,12(3), 230–243.
Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science.International Journal of Science Education,11, 481–490.
Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students.Studies in Science Education,5, 61–84.
Egan, K. (1986).Teaching as story telling. London, ON: The Althouse Press.
Egan, K. (1988). Metaphors in collision: Objectives, assembly lines, and stories.Curriculum Inquiry,18(1), 63–85.
Finley, F. N. (1983). Science processes.Journal of Research in Science Education,20(1), 47–54.
Garrison, J., & Bentley, M. (1990). Science education, conceptual change and breaking with everyday experience.Studies in Philosophy and Education,10, 19–35.
Holton, G. (1957). Foundations of modern physics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kenealy, P. (1989). Telling a coherent “story”: A role for the history and philosophy of science in a physical science course. In D. E. Herget (Ed.),History and philosophy of science in science teaching. Proceedings of the first international conference (pp. 209–220). Tallahassee: Florida State University.
Kuhn, T. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Linn, M. C. (1982). Theoretical and practical significance of formal reasoning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,19(9), 727–742.
Lühl, J. (1990). The history of atomic theory and its societal and philosophical implications in chemistry classes. In D. E. Herget,History and philosophy of science in science teaching. Proceedings of the first international conference (pp. 266–273). Tallahassee: Florida State University.
Nercessian, N. (1989). Conceptual change in science and in science education.Synthese,80, 163–183.
Novak, J. (1977).A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Osborne, R., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process.Science Education,67(4), 439–508.
Ruse, M. (1989). Making use of creationism. A case-study for the philosophy of science classroom.Studies in Philosophy and Education,10(1), 81–92.
Shipstone, D., Rhoneck, C., Jung, W., Karrqvist, C., Dupin, J., Johsue, S., & Lichd, P. (1989). A study of students' understanding of electricity in five European countries,International Journal of Science Education,10(3), 303–316.
Stinner, A. O. (1990). Philosophy, thought experiments and large context problems in the secondary school physics course.International Journal of Science Education,12(3), 244–257.
Stinner, A., & Winchester I. (1981). The physics of Star Trek.New Scientist,92(1285/1286), 884–886.
Stinner, A. (1980). Physics and the bionic man.The Physics Teacher,18(5), 358–361.
Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics.European Journal of Science Education,1, 205–221.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching.Synthese,80(1), 121–140.
Wandersee, J. (1986). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students' misconceptions?Journal of Research in Science Education,23(7), 581–597.
Whitehead, A. (1967).The aims of education. New York: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stinner, A., Williams, H. Conceptual change, history, and science stories. Interchange 24, 87–103 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447342
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447342