Skip to main content
Log in

Finite perturbation of convex programs

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics and Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns a characterization of the finite-perturbation property of a convex program. When this property holds, finite perturbation of the objective function of a convex program leads to a solution of the original problem which minimizes the perturbation function over the set of solutions of the original problem. This generalizes a finite-termination property of the proximal point algorithm for linear programs and characterizes finite Tikhonov regularization of convex programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. V. Burke and M. C. Ferris (1991) Characterization of solution sets of convex programs. Operations Research Letters, 10, to appear.

  2. R. De Leone an O. L. Mangasarian (1988) Serial and parallel solution of large-scale linear programs by augmented Lagrangian successive overrelaxation. In A. Kurzhanski, K. Neumann, and D. Pallaschke, editors, Optimization, Parallel Processing and Applications, pages 103–124. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 304. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. J. Gould and J. W. Tolle (1971) A necessary and sufficient qualification for constrained optimization. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 20:164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Guignard (1969) Generalized Kuhn—Tucker conditions for mathematical programming in a Banach space. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 7:232–241.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.-P. Han and O. L. Mangasarian (1979) Exact penalty functions in nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming, 17:251–269.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. L. Mangasarian (1984) Normal solutions of linear programs. Mathematical Programming Study, 22:206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. L. Mangasarian (1988) A simple characterization of solution sets of convex programs. Operations Research Letters, 7(1):21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O. L. Mangasarian (1990) Least norm solution of non-monotone complementarity problems. In L. J. Leifman, editor, Functional Analysis, Optimization, and Mathematical Economics, pages 217–221. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. L. Mangasarian and R. R. Meyer (1979) Nonlinear perturbation of linear programs. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 17(6):745–752.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. W. Peterson (1973) A review of constraint qualifications in finite-dimensional spaces. SIAM Review, 15:639–654.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. T. Polyak (1987) Introduction to Optimization. Optimization Software, Inc., Publications Division, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. T. Polyak and N. V. Tretiyakov (1972) Concerning an iterative method for linear programming and its economic interpretation. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 8(5):740–751 (in Russian; English translation in Matekon, 10(3):81–100 (1974)).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. N. Tikhonov and V. Y. Arsenin (1977) Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This material is based on research supported by National Science Foundation Grants DCR-8521228 and CCR-8723091 and Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grants AFOSR-86-0172 and AFOSR-89-0410.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferris, M.C., Mangasarian, O.L. Finite perturbation of convex programs. Appl Math Optim 23, 263–273 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01442401

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01442401

Keywords

Navigation