Skip to main content
Log in

A cosine operator approach to modelingL 2(0,T; L 2 (Γ))—Boundary input hyperbolic equations

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics and Optimization Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the regularity properties of the solution of a second-order hyperbolic equation defined over a bounded domain Ω with boundary Γ, under the action of a boundary forcing term inL 2(0,T; L 2(Γ)). Both Dirichlet and Neumann nonhomogeneous cases are considered. A functional analytic model based on cosine operator functions is presented, which provides an input-solution formula to be interpreted in appropriate topologies. With the help of this model, it is shown, for example, that the solution of the nonhomogeneous Dirichlet problem is inL 2(0,T; L 2(Ω)), when Ω is either a parallelepiped or a sphere, while the solution of the nonhomogeneous Neumann problem is inL 2(0,T; H 3/4-e(Ω)) when Ω is a parallelepiped and inL 2(0,T; H 2/3(Ω) when Ω is a sphere. The Dirichlet case for general domains is studied by means of pseudodifferential operator techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. S. Agranovich, Boundary value problems for systems of first order pseudo differential operators,Russian Mathematical Surveys, 24, 1, Jan.–Feb., 59–126. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Boutet de Monvel, Comportement d'un operator pseudodifferentiel sur une variété à bord, I. La propriété de transmission,J. Anal. Math., 17, 241–304 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Balakrishnan, Filtering and control problems for partial differential equations,Proceedings of the 2nd Kingston Conference on Differential Games and Control Theory, University of Rhode Island, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. V. Balakrishnan, Boundary control of parabolic equations:L-Q-R theory,Proceedings of the Conference on Theory of Non Linear Operators, September 1977, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. L. Butzer, R. J. Nessel,Fourier analysis and approximation, Academic Press, 1971.

  6. R. Courant and D. Hilbert,Methods of mathematical physics, I, Interscience, 1953.

  7. G. Doetsch,Introduction to the theory and application of the Laplace transfer motion, Springer-Verlag, 1970.

  8. H. B. Dwight,Tables of integrals and other mathematical data, 4th ed., MacMillan, 1961.

  9. H. O. Fattorini, Ordinary differential equations in linear topological spaces, I and II,J. Differ. Eqs. 5, 72–105 (1968), and 6, 50–70 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. O. Fattorini, The time optimal problem for distributed control of systems described by the wave equation, inControl theory of systems governed by partial differential equations, Academic Press, 1977.

  11. H. O. Fattorini, Boundary control systems,SIAM J. Control, 6, 349–385 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. O. Fattorini, Controllability of higher order linear systems, inMathematical theory of control, (A. V. Balakrishnan and L. W. Neustad, eds), Academic Press, NY, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Fujiwara, Concrete characterization of the domains of fractional powers of some elliptic differential operators of the second order,Proc. Japan Acad., 13, 82–86 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Graham, Separation of eigenvalues of the equation for the unit ball inR N,Studies in Appl. Math, L11:4, 329–343 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. D. Graham and D. L. Russell, Boundary value control of the wave equation in a spherical region, SIAM J. Control,12, 174–196 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Hille and R. S. Phillips,Functional analysis and semigroups, Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. B. W. Jolley,Summation of series, 2nd. Rev. Ed., Dover, 1961.

  18. J. I. Kohn and L. Nirenberg, An algebra of pseudo-differential operators,Commun. Pure & Appl. Math., XVIII, 269–305 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. L. Lions,Optimal control of systems governed by partial differential equations, Springer-Verlag, 1971.

  20. J. L. Lions and E. Magenes,Nonhomogeneous boundary value problems and applications, I, II (1972), and III (1973), Springer-Verlag.

  21. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, Hyperbolic equations with Dirichlet boundary feedback via position vector: regularity and almost periodic stabilization,J. Appl. Math. & Optim., to appear.

  22. I. Lasiecka, Unified theory for abstract parabolic boundary problems, A semigroup approach,J. Appl. Math. & Optim., to appear.

  23. J. L. Lions, Espaces d'interpolation et domaines de puissances fractionnaires d'operateurs,J. Math. Soc. Japan, 14:2, 233–241 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Mikhailov,Partial differential equations, Nauka MIR Publs., Moscow (English translation) (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Necas,Les methodes directes en theorie des equations elliptiques, Masson et Cie, Editeurs, 1967.

  26. A. C. Paley and N. Wiener,Fourier transforms in the complex domain, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R. I., 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Sakamoto, Mixed problems for hyperbolic equations, I, II, J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 343–373, 10-2-1970 and 403–417, 10-3 (1970).

  28. M. Sova, Cosine operator functions, Rozpr. Mat., XLIX (1966)-.

  29. A. E. Taylor and W. R. Mann,Advanced calculus, 2nd ed., John Wiley, 1972

  30. M. Taylor, Note on the neumann boundary conditons for the wave equation, preprint.

  31. M. Taylor,Pseudo-differential operators, Lect. Notes in Math.,416 (1974) Springer-Verlag.

  32. H. Triebel,Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential operators, VEB, Deut. Verlag der Wissenshaften, Berlin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. R. Volevič, Local properties of nonhomogeneous pseudo-differential operators,Trans. Moscow Math. Soc., 16, 53–105 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. C. Washburn, A semi-group theoretic approach to modeling of boundary input problems,Proc. IFIP Working Conf., Univ. of Rome, Springer-Verlag, 1977.

  35. D. C. Washburn, A bound on the boundary input map for parabolic equations with applications to time optimal control, SIAM J. Cont. & Optim., Sept. 1979.

  36. G. N. Watson,A treatise on the theory of bessel functions, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948.

  37. V. A. Kondratiev, Boundary problems for elliptic equations in domains with conical or angular points. Transl. Moscow Math. Soc. 16 (1967).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. V. Balakrishnan

This research was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grant AFOSR-78-3350 (1st author) and Grant AFOSR-77-3338 (2nd author).

This research was performed while the author was visiting the Department of System Science, University of California, Los Angeles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lasiecka, I., Triggiani, R. A cosine operator approach to modelingL 2(0,T; L 2 (Γ))—Boundary input hyperbolic equations. Appl Math Optim 7, 35–93 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01442108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01442108

Keywords

Navigation