Skip to main content
Log in

Retest stability of DSM-III-R diagnoses among adolescents using the diagnostic interview schedule for children (DISC-2.1C)

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retest stability of DSM-III-R diagnoses was assessed using the DISC-2.1C with a sample of Anglo, African, and Hispanic American adolescent patients 12 to 17 years of age. Based on the kappa statistic, retest stability was fair for any disorder (κ =.50), for any anxiety disorder (κ =.44), for any affective disorder (κ =.53), for any disruptive behavior disorder (κ =.58), and for substance use disorders (κ =.46). Although there was a trend for reliability to be somewhat higher for African Americans (κ =.58) than for Anglos (κ =.42) or Hispanics (κ =.49), these differences were not statistically significant. In general, 15- to 17-year-olds had somewhat better reliability (κ =.58) than did 12- to 14-year-olds (κ =.44). Males had somewhat higher reliability (κ =.63) than females (κ =.43). These findings are congruent with those reported recently using the DISC-R (Schwab-Stone et al., 1993) and suggest that the DISC appears to be at least as reliable as other available child diagnostic instruments. In view of the fair-to-moderate levels of reliability of these instruments in general, future research should focus on the joint effects of instrument, subject, interviewer, and nomenclature on operating characteristics of diagnostic interview schedules, focusing in particular on factors affecting accurate recall and reporting of symptoms and episodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneshensel, C. S., Estrada, A. L., Hansell, M. J., & Clark, V. A. (1987). Social psychological aspects of reporting behavior: Lifetime depressive episode reports.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28 232–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bromet, E. J., Dunn, L. O., Connell, M. M., Dew, M. A., & Schulberg, H. C. (1986). Longterm reliability of diagnosing lifetime major depression in a community sample.Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 435–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, W., Puig-Antich, J., Hirsch, M., et al. (1985). The assessment of affective disorders in children and adolescents by semistructured interview: Test-retest reliability of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for school-aged children. Present Episode Version.Archives of General Psychiatry, 42 696–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, E. J., Burns, B. J., Angold, A., & Leaf, P., Jr. (1993). How can epidemiology improve mental health services for children and adolescents?Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32 1106–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, E. J., Edelbrock, C., & Costello, A. J. (1985). The validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children: A comparison between pediatric and psychiatric referrals.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13 579–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. J., Edelbrock, C., Duncan, M. K., Kalas, R., & Klaric, S. H. (1984).Development and testing of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children in a clinic population. Final Report (Contract No. RFP-DB-81-0027). Rockville, MD: Center for Epidemiologic Studies, National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelbrock, C., & Costello, A. J. (1988). Structured psychiatric interviews for children. In M. Rutter, A. H. Tuma, & I. S. Lann (Eds.),Assessment and diagnosis in child psychopathology (pp. 87–112). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P., Shaffer, D., Piacentini, J., et al. (1993). Sensitivity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, 2nd Edition (DISC-2.1) for specific diagnosis of children and adolescents.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 666–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J., & Everitt, B. S. (1969). Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa.Psychological Bulletin, 72 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutterman, E. M., O'Brien, J. D., & Young, J. G. (1987). Structured diagnostic interviews for children and adolescents: Current status and future directions.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, K., Cools, J., & McKnew, D. (1989). Test-retest reliability of a clinical research interview for children: The Child Assessment Schedule.Psychological Assessment: A Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1 317–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobe, J. B., & Mingay, D. J. (1989). Cognitive research improves questionnaires.American Journal of Public Health, 79 1053–1055.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A. F., Duncan-Jones, P., & Scott, R. (1989). An analysis of the re-test artefact in longitudinal studies of psychiatric symptoms and personality.Psychological Medicine, 19 487–493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics, 33 159–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne, J. V., Arend, R., Rosenbaum, D., Sinacore, J., et al. (1994). Interrater reliability of the DSM-III-R with preschool children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 22 679–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, B., Nigam, A., Zarrow, M., Loftus, E. F., & Donaldson, M. S. (1989). Autobiographical memory for health-related events.Vital and Health Statistics, Series 6, No. 2.

  • McLeod, J. D., Turnbull, J. E., Kessler, R. C., & Abelson, J. M. (1990). Sources of discrepancy in a comparison of a lay-administered diagnostic instrument with clinical diagnosis.Psychiatry Research, 31 145–159.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piacentini, J. C., Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Schwab-Stone, M., Davies, M., & Gioia, P. (1993). The Diagnostic Interview for Children—Revised Version (DISC-R): III. Criterion validity.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32 658–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Seeley, J. R. (1993). A brief measure of loneliness suitable for use with adolescents.Psychological Reports, 72 1379–1391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. E., Vernon, S. A., & Rhodes, H. M. (in press). Effects of language and ethnic status on reliability and validity of the DIS.Research in Community and Mental Health.

  • Robins, L. H., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity.Archives of General Psychiatry, 38 393–398.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Tuma, A. H., & Lann, I. S. (Eds.). (1988).Assessment and diagnosis in child psychopathology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab-Stone, M., Fisher, P., Piacentini, J., et al. (1993). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children—Revised Version (DISC-R): II. Test-retest reliability.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32 651–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Gould, M., & Wunsch-Hitzig, R. (1981). Estimating the prevalence of childhood psychopathology.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 20 462–476.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. (1993). Discussion of “How can epidemiology improve mental health services for children and adolescents?”Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32 1114–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D., Schwab-Stone, M., Fisher, P., et al. (1993). The Diagnostic Interview for Children—Revised (DISC-R): I. Preparation, field-testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 2 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanur, J. M. (Ed.). (1991).Questions about questions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welner, Z., Reich, W., Herjanic, B., Jung, K., & Amado, H. (1987). Reliability, validity, and parent-child agreement studies of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA).Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26 645–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. G., O'Brien, J. D. Gutterman, E. M., & Cohen, P. (1987). Research on the clinical interview.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26 613–620.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by grants MH44214 and MH44773 from the National Institute of Mental Health, and by the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health. The authors wish to acknowledge the participation and collaboration of A. J. Pumariega, J. W. Swanson, and C. E. Holzer III and staff of the Center for Cross-Cultural Research, directed by F. M. Treviño.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, R.E., Solovitz, B.L., Chen, YW. et al. Retest stability of DSM-III-R diagnoses among adolescents using the diagnostic interview schedule for children (DISC-2.1C). J Abnorm Child Psychol 24, 349–362 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01441635

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01441635

Keywords

Navigation