References
Rose, A.: Math. Ann.123, 76–78 (1951).
Łukasiewicz, J., andA. Tarski: Comptes rendus (Warsaw),21, 30–50 (1930).
See footnote 1.
Post, E. L.: Am J. Math.43, 163–185 (1921).
Rose, A.: Math. Ann.126, 144–148 (1953).
Church, A.: Portugal. Math.7, 87–90 (1948).
See footnote 1.
See footnote 1.
Sincev 1, ...,v j are relatively prime,i is uniquely determined. See, for example,Kleene, S. C.: Introduction to meta-mathematics (Amsterdam 1952), p. 240.
Cf. the cyclic case in the proof of Theorem 2.
Rose, A.: Math. Ann.143, 448–462 (1961).
See footnote 12.
See footnote 12.
See, for example, the paper referred to in footnote 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, A. An alternative generalisation of the concept of duality. Math. Ann. 147, 318–327 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01440954
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01440954