Skip to main content
Log in

Boundary tension between amphiphilic layers

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structure and tension of the region of contact where an oil phase, a water phase, and a microemulsion phase meet, are theoretically investigated. The analysis has as a starting point a Landau theory-like expression for the free energy in which, besides the usual gradient of the density squared term, a term proportional to the second derivative of the density squared is present, while the coefficient of the squared gradient tern is taken to be negative in the microemulsion phase. It is shown that a first-order wetting transition exists at which point infinitely many (n=0,1,2,...) surface phases can coexist, each described by the presence of a diferent thickness of the microemulsion phase between the oil and the water phase. This situation physically describes the coexistence of layers of amphiphilic molecules with different thicknesses between a water and an oil bulk phase, the thickness of one amphiphilic layer being equal tol 0. We present the calculation of the density profile and the boundary tension of the contact region of a coexistingn = 0 andn = 1 surface phase, e.g., between the oil-water interface with a single amphiphilic layer present and the oil-water interface where three amphiphilic layers are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Meunier, D. Langevin, and N. Boccara (eds.).Physics of Amphiphilic Layers, Springer Proc. Phys.21 (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. J. Benvegnu and H. M. McConnell.J. Phys. Chem. 96:6820 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Pieranski, L. Beliard, J.-Ph. Tournellec, X. Leoncini, C. Furtlebner, H. Dumoulin, E. Riou, B. Jouvin. J.-P. Fénerol, Ph. Palarie, J. Heuving, B. Cartier, and I. Kraus,Physica A 194:364 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Rivière, S. Hénon, and J. Meunier,Phys. Rev. E 49:1375 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a review see. J. O. Indekeu,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 8:309 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Szleifer and B. Widom,Mol. Phys. 75:925 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Perković, I. Szleifer, and B. Widom,Mol. Phys. 80:729 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. O. Indeken,Physica A 183:439 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. M. Blokhuis,Physica A 202:402 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Gompper and M. Schick.Physica. Rev. Lett. 65:1116 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Gompper and S. Zschocke,Phys. Rev. A 46:4386 (1992); G. Gompper and M. Schick, inPhase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, C. Domb and J. Lebowitz. eds. (Academic, New York), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Schick,J. de Phys. IV 3:47 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. S. Rowlinson and B. Widom,Molecular Theory of Capillarity (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. M. Blokhuis,Physica A (in press).

  15. For a review of the history and present status of Antonow's rule. see A. Winter,Heterogen. Chem. Rev. (in press).

  16. N. V. Churaev, V. M. Starov, and B. V. Derjaguin,J. Colloid Interface Sci. 89:16 (1982); J. F. Joanny, and P. G. de Gennes,J. Colloid Interface Sci. 111:94 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blokhuis, E.M. Boundary tension between amphiphilic layers. Int J Thermophys 16, 53–62 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01438957

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01438957

Key words

Navigation