Advertisement

Lifestyles

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 35–45 | Cite as

Personality analysis of a swingers' club

  • Jane Duckworth
  • Eugene E. Levitt
Article

Abstract

Thirty swingers (16 females, 14 males) from a private metropolitan swinging club volunteered to take the MMPI. One half of the 30 had significant elevations on the clinical and/or validity scales, most frequently on the 9 scale (Hypomania). One third of the sample with normal MMPI scale elevations had significant elevations on validity scales that indicate defensiveness in responding. Analysis of a selected group of special scales of the MMPI indicated that a significant minority of the subjects 1) may be seriously emotionally disturbed, 2) may be substance abusers, or 3) may have serious sexual problems. The MMPI records suggest further that the absence of significantly elevated clinical scales among the normal subgroup may have been a function of defensiveness. On the other hand, most of the subgroup evidencing psychopathology possess ego resources sufficient to enable them to cope with emotional problems.

Keywords

Social Policy Substance Abuser Normal Subgroup Social Issue Emotional Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartell, G.D. Group sex among the Mid-Americans. In N.N. Wagner (ed.),Perspectives on human sexuality. New York: Behavioral Publications,1974.Google Scholar
  2. ——Group sex: A scientists' eyewitness report on the American way of swinging. New York: Wyden, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, R.R. Swinging—The sexual exchange of marriage partners.Sex Behavior 1971,1 70–79.Google Scholar
  4. Block, J.The challenge of response sets: Unconfounding meaning, acquiescence and social desirability in the MMPI. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, C.L., & Spanier, G.G. Comarital mate-sharing and family stability.Journal of Sex Research 1974,10, 21–31.Google Scholar
  6. Connolly, F.J., Levitt, E.E., & McAdoo, W.G.Subscriber's manual—Computer-assisted analysis of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Indianapolis, IUPUI Printing Facility, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Denfield, D. Dropouts from swinging: The marriage counselor as informant. In J.R. Smith and L.R. Smith (eds.),Beyond monogamy: Recent studies of sexual alternatives in marriage. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. —— & Gordon M. The sociology of mate swapping: Or the family that swings together clings together.Journal of Sex Research 1970,6 85–100.Google Scholar
  9. Duckworth, J.MMPI interpretation manual for counselors and clinicians (2nd ed.). Muncie, Indiana: Accelerated Development, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Gilmartin, B.G. Sexual deviance and social networks: A study of social, family, and marital interaction patterns among co-marital sex participants. In J.R. Smith and L.R. Smith (eds.),Beyond monogamy: Recent studies in sexual alternatives in marriage. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. —— That swinging couple down the block.Psychology Today 1975,8 55–58.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, R.E. & Lingoes, J.C. Subscales for the MMPI: An aid to profile interpretation. (mimeographed) Department of Psychiatry, University of California, 1968.Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, M.Sexual behavior in the 1970's. Chicago: Playboy Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. Karlen, A. Swingers: The conservative hedonists.Sexololy, 1980,46, 13–18.Google Scholar
  15. MacAndrew, C. The differentiation of male alcoholic outpatients from non-alcoholic psychiatric outpatients by means of the MMPI.Quarterly Journal of Studies in Alcohol 1965,26, 238–246.Google Scholar
  16. Murstein, B.I. Swinging or co-marital sex. In B.I. Murstein, (ed.),Exploring intimate life styles. New York: Springer, 1978.Google Scholar
  17. O'Neill, G., & O'Neill, N. Patterns in group sexual activity.Journal of Sex Research 1970,6 101–112.Google Scholar
  18. Palson, C., & Palson, R. Swinging in wedlock.Society 1972,9 29–37.Google Scholar
  19. Pepper, L.J. & Strong, P.N. Judgmental subscales for the Mf scale of the MMPI. (mimeographed) 1958.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, J.R., & Smith, L.R. Co-marital sex and the sexual freedom movement.Journal of Sex Research 1970,6 131–142.Google Scholar
  21. Symonds, C. Pilot study of the peripheral behavior of sexual mate swappers. Unpublished master's thesis. University of California at Riverside, 1968.Google Scholar
  22. Toobert, S., Bartelme, K.F. & Jones, E.S. Some factors related to pedophilia.International Journal of Social Psychiatry 1959,4 272–279.Google Scholar
  23. Tydlaska, M., & Mengel, R. A scale for measuring work attitude for the MMPI.Journal of Applied Psychology 1953,37 474–477.Google Scholar
  24. Walshok, M.L. The emergence of middle-class deviant subcultures: The case of swingers. In J.R. Smith and L.R. Smith (eds.),Beyond monogamy: Recent studies of sexual alternatives in marriage. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. Whitehurst, R.N. Alternative life-styles.The Humanist 1975,35 23–26.Google Scholar
  26. Wiggins, J.S. Substantive dimensions of self-report in the MMPI item pool.Psychological Monograph 1966,80 22, whole no. 630.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Duckworth
    • 1
  • Eugene E. Levitt
    • 2
  1. 1.Ball State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Indiana University School of MedicineUSA

Personalised recommendations