Skip to main content
Log in

Community engagement in the implementation of educational policy in Trinidad and Tobago

  • Articles
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inauguration of “double-shift” junior secondary schooling in Trinidad and Tobago in 1973 created several problems for local planners, policy makers, parents, and students themselves. In some cases solution has been found, but in others problems have remained defiant and irresolute. In the latter category is the problem of deviant student behaviour during “off-shift” sessions, believed to be the result of poor student choice regarding the use of time. Recommendations have been made to redress this situation through engagement of community groups. This paper argues that this approach is problematical and contradictory and will not achieve stipulated objectives. The main reason for the gloomy outlook is the principle of decentralization, which must be taken into account in any attempt to engage the local community. Community engagement is examined against certain imperatives of decentralization. The paper concludes, however, that as a strategy, community engagement is doomed to failure. Poor choices by junior secondary school students in the use of their “off-shift” hours are therefore very likely to persist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumert, J., & Goldschmidt, D. (1980). Centralization and decentralization as determinants of education policy in the Federal Republic of Germany.Social Science Information,19, 1029–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1984).Educational planning in a decentralized system: The Papua New Guinea experience. Sidney: Sidney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M., & Lillis, K. (1988). Community financing of education: Issues and policy implications in less developed countries. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. (1983). Decentralization and development: Conclusions and directions. In G. S. Cheema & D. Rondinelli (Eds.)Decentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers, D. (1982).The role of decentralization in national development studies. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1982).Reform and retrenchment: The politics of California school finance reform. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1986).Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, S. B. (1992). Why restructure? An international survey of the roots of reform.Journal of Education Policy,7, 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N., & Street, S. (1986). Educational decentralization: Weak state or strong state.Comparative Education Review,30, 471–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983).Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1968).Draft education plan. Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1975).Report of junior secondary schools (Moses Report). Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1991).Report on junior secondary schools: Proposals for the offshift session. Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1992).Reactions to proposals for the off-shift session in junior secondary schools. Unpublished manuscript. Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. (1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries.International Review of Administrative Sciences,157, 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaeffer, S. (1992). Collaborating for educational change: The role of parents and the community in school improvement.International Journal of Educational Development,12, 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, A. D. (1992). Educational restructuring: International perspectives.Journal of Education Policy,7, 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspoor, A. (1992). Planning of education: Where do we go.International Journal of Educational Development,12, 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H. (1983). Legalization, expertise and participation: Strategies of compensatory legitimation in educational policy.Comparative Education Review,27, 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational de-centralization: An exercise in contradiction?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,12, 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1988).Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Policies for adjustment, revitalization and expansion. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Council on Education for All. (1990).World declaration on education for all. New York: World Council on Education for All Inter-Agency Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yulat, Y.G.M. (1988). Education and national development: The continuing problem of misdiagnosis and irrelevant prescriptions.International Journal of Educational Development,8, 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

London, N.A. Community engagement in the implementation of educational policy in Trinidad and Tobago. Interchange 25, 335–348 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435878

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435878

Key words

Navigation