Abstract
Inauguration of “double-shift” junior secondary schooling in Trinidad and Tobago in 1973 created several problems for local planners, policy makers, parents, and students themselves. In some cases solution has been found, but in others problems have remained defiant and irresolute. In the latter category is the problem of deviant student behaviour during “off-shift” sessions, believed to be the result of poor student choice regarding the use of time. Recommendations have been made to redress this situation through engagement of community groups. This paper argues that this approach is problematical and contradictory and will not achieve stipulated objectives. The main reason for the gloomy outlook is the principle of decentralization, which must be taken into account in any attempt to engage the local community. Community engagement is examined against certain imperatives of decentralization. The paper concludes, however, that as a strategy, community engagement is doomed to failure. Poor choices by junior secondary school students in the use of their “off-shift” hours are therefore very likely to persist.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumert, J., & Goldschmidt, D. (1980). Centralization and decentralization as determinants of education policy in the Federal Republic of Germany.Social Science Information,19, 1029–1098.
Bray, M. (1984).Educational planning in a decentralized system: The Papua New Guinea experience. Sidney: Sidney University Press.
Bray, M., & Lillis, K. (1988). Community financing of education: Issues and policy implications in less developed countries. Oxford: Pergamon.
Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. (1983). Decentralization and development: Conclusions and directions. In G. S. Cheema & D. Rondinelli (Eds.)Decentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Conyers, D. (1982).The role of decentralization in national development studies. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.
Elmore, R. F., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1982).Reform and retrenchment: The politics of California school finance reform. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Freire, P. (1986).Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Lawton, S. B. (1992). Why restructure? An international survey of the roots of reform.Journal of Education Policy,7, 139–154.
McGinn, N., & Street, S. (1986). Educational decentralization: Weak state or strong state.Comparative Education Review,30, 471–490.
Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983).Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Ministry of Education (1968).Draft education plan. Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.
Ministry of Education (1975).Report of junior secondary schools (Moses Report). Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.
Ministry of Education (1991).Report on junior secondary schools: Proposals for the offshift session. Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.
Ministry of Education (1992).Reactions to proposals for the off-shift session in junior secondary schools. Unpublished manuscript. Port of Spain, Trinidad: Author.
Rondinelli, D. (1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries.International Review of Administrative Sciences,157, 137–151.
Shaeffer, S. (1992). Collaborating for educational change: The role of parents and the community in school improvement.International Journal of Educational Development,12, 277–295.
Swanson, A. D. (1992). Educational restructuring: International perspectives.Journal of Education Policy,7, 135–137.
Verspoor, A. (1992). Planning of education: Where do we go.International Journal of Educational Development,12, 233–244.
Weiler, H. (1983). Legalization, expertise and participation: Strategies of compensatory legitimation in educational policy.Comparative Education Review,27, 259–277.
Weiler, H. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational de-centralization: An exercise in contradiction?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,12, 433–448.
World Bank. (1988).Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Policies for adjustment, revitalization and expansion. Washington, DC: Author.
World Council on Education for All. (1990).World declaration on education for all. New York: World Council on Education for All Inter-Agency Commission.
Yulat, Y.G.M. (1988). Education and national development: The continuing problem of misdiagnosis and irrelevant prescriptions.International Journal of Educational Development,8, 315–328.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
London, N.A. Community engagement in the implementation of educational policy in Trinidad and Tobago. Interchange 25, 335–348 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435878
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435878